Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

To me the even bigger question:

What “Doctor” performed such a procedure?

If the judge decided that the woman was also too good looking for her mental condition, would the “Doctor” also have agreed to ugly her up a bit?

Besides having judges that don’t deserve to judge anybody, we have doctors that don’t deserve to be doctoring anybody!


6 posted on 02/21/2012 9:49:20 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: I cannot think of a name

That’s a good question. This is breaking news. Just a few sources are carrying this.

But I don’t see anywhere that an actual abortion has taken place - even in spite of this idiot judge’s decision.


9 posted on 02/21/2012 9:52:27 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: I cannot think of a name

Per the article “which an appeals court reversed last month in unsparing terms,” I’d have to assume that since the decision was reversed that the woman is either still pregnant or has had the baby?


16 posted on 02/21/2012 9:55:38 AM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: I cannot think of a name

Any doctor who performs abortions already has shown they don’t take the Hippocratic oath seriously, so why would this be surprising?

BTW, I don’t think the procedure was actually performed in this case, since the daughter won her appeal.


88 posted on 02/21/2012 12:22:12 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson