Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Got Served
American Thinker ^ | February 1, 2012 | Cindy Simpson

Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven

[snip]...Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.

Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.

The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.

Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; abovethelaw; areyoubeingserved; ballot; bho44; bhocorruption; bhofascism; birthcertificate; blog; bloggersandpersonal; braking; certifigate; constitution; contempt; contemptofcourt; corruption; democrats; election; election2012; elections; fraud; georgia; imom; impeach; lawless; liberalfascism; naturalborncitizen; naturalized; nobama; nobama2012; nonserviam; obama; scofflaw; snot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 681-693 next last
To: Kansas58
Natural Born Citizen means CITIZEN AT BIRTH!

According to whom??? Find a legal source that says this and is actually backed up by caselaw.

181 posted on 02/01/2012 9:56:43 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
both
182 posted on 02/01/2012 9:58:28 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
both
183 posted on 02/01/2012 9:58:31 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
both
184 posted on 02/01/2012 9:58:31 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Is that you, Barry?


185 posted on 02/01/2012 9:58:55 PM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: edge919

The English Language says so.
Congress defined citizenship.
Again, look at any passport application.


186 posted on 02/01/2012 10:00:40 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
Try to be a bit more mature, would you?
I can't stand Obama but I refuse to make a fool of myself with issues or tactics that do not hurt Obama.
187 posted on 02/01/2012 10:02:21 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
Try to be a bit more mature, would you?
I can't stand Obama but I refuse to make a fool of myself with issues or tactics that do not hurt Obama.
188 posted on 02/01/2012 10:02:21 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

It’s called capias, which is a name for a number of writs that command a sheriff or other officer to arrest a person and bring them before the court. They cannot be executed outside the jurisdiction on the issuing court.

There are state statutes that require courts to issue capias, warrants, or other writs on out-of-state actions in certain circumstances, such as child support situations. These statutes are in derogation of the common law rule that no capias would issue on a foreign cause of action.

I’m not sure what Delaware was doing, but I rather doubt a sheriff in Maryland would feel compelled to obey the writs of a Delaware court. There must be some compact or other arrangement where the local court issued capias on request of the Delaware authorities.


189 posted on 02/01/2012 10:05:50 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

““Natural Born Citizen” has ALWAYS meant “Citizen at the Moment of Birth”

WRONG! The person whose father was born in Canada to two U.S. citizens, is a “citizen at birth”. FACT

Are you saying he would be eligible to be president of the United States (a Natural Born Citizen) having been born in a foreign country?

That IS what you are saying and it is RIDICULOUS!


190 posted on 02/01/2012 10:06:17 PM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Find an application for Passport, online.
They are on the Department of State website.

Those applications list several different citizenship dates and requirements during those dates.

191 posted on 02/01/2012 10:07:05 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Find an application for Passport, online.
They are on the Department of State website.

Those applications list several different citizenship dates and requirements during those dates.

192 posted on 02/01/2012 10:07:12 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Find an application for Passport, online.
They are on the Department of State website.

Those applications list several different citizenship dates and requirements during those dates.

193 posted on 02/01/2012 10:07:20 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

My passport should read “natural born citizen”.


194 posted on 02/01/2012 10:07:40 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
So if Ahmadinejad's wife flew to the US and had a child here, said child would be a Natural Born Citizen? I don't think so. It was the obvious intent of the founders to have a Presidential candidate be free of foreign entanglements. It's about allegience.

Two citizen parents, born on US soil = Natural Born Citizen. That's logical.

195 posted on 02/01/2012 10:08:46 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Your example depends on the age of the parents and the year of said birth.
Congress has changed the citizenship rules a few times.


196 posted on 02/01/2012 10:09:10 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Congress can not undo the constitution. It requires a constitutional amendment to do so. Anchor babies are not mentioned in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
197 posted on 02/01/2012 10:10:19 PM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
look at any passport application, available at the Post Office or at the State Department website.

Here is an online passport application...http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/79955.pdf

All you need to know about Congressional action, IE Citizenship, is right there for all to see.
I don't see a damn thing there telling me which laws do what you say they do.
Even searching USC and Public Law, though both give a response, doesn't do me much good.
Help me out here...unless you can't because all that you've said is BS.
Which is it? Help me out or admit that you're talking smack.

198 posted on 02/01/2012 10:10:37 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Either that, or the reporting was not entirely accurate. Given the media’s (traditional and otherwise) track record with regards to reporting on legal proceedings, I’ll presume the latter.


199 posted on 02/01/2012 10:12:13 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

Idiots vs common sense


200 posted on 02/01/2012 10:13:37 PM PST by itsahoot (Killing humans can't be immoral else pulling weeds from the garden would be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 681-693 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson