Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP New Hampshire Primary debate tonight on ABC at 9 PM et [LIVE THREAD]
2012 Election Central ^ | 01/07/2012 | Nate

Posted on 01/07/2012 1:21:48 PM PST by katiedidit1

GOP New Hampshire primary debate tonight on ABC at 9pm ET

By Nate, on January 7th, 2012

Tonight will mark the first of two debates this weekend focused on the New Hampshire Republican primary. This evening's debate will take place at Saint Anselm College and is sponsored by ABC News, Yahoo! and WMUR. Sunday morning will feature a GOP debate broadcast on NBC at 9am ET (yes, am) but look for more details on that later today.

Air Time: Saturday, January 7th at 9pm ET / 6pm PT on ABC

Live Stream: WMUR and Yahoo! News

Participants: Santorum, Romney, Paul, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman

Report from WMUR:

(Excerpt) Read more at 2012presidentialelectionnews.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2ndammendment; 4th; 85000000progunvotes; abc4liarromney; abcflacksmitt; abcpimpsromney; abcprrep; alotsantorumspending; anger; antigunvotes1996; banglist; contractwiththeearth; controversyloses; diamondsareforever; elections; florida; focusoneconomyorlose; freddienewt; gingrich; globalwarming; goa; gunfreezonevote; gunownersofamerica; gunrights; honesty; iowa; livegopdebate; livenhgopdebate; missouri; mrsolutionshohum; newhampshire; newt; newt1996lautenberg; newt2012; newtlautenberg; nhgopdebate; perry; porkbarrelsantorum; reasonableguncontrol; santorum; santuckabee; sofa; southcarolina; spendtorum; talkischeap; toolazytogetonballot; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 1,781-1,798 next last
To: make no mistake
Perry was honest in Iowa about Ethanol

Exactly, he does not talk out both sides of his mouth.

1,501 posted on 01/07/2012 8:33:35 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (We Can Take OUR Country Back--Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1481 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
WHY IS THIS LYING PIECE OF LIBERAL GARBAGE BEING GIVEN A FREE PASS!!

Because the MSM knows they can destroy him in the general election against Obama.
1,502 posted on 01/07/2012 8:33:41 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1376 | View Replies]

To: floridarunner01

Neither Perry not Paul were given a fair amount of time.

Santorum performed well, but no one laid a glove on Romney.


1,503 posted on 01/07/2012 8:34:07 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1489 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Ah, thank you very much. I will check CSPAN for a replay and CSPAN will have it in their Library to watch online.


1,504 posted on 01/07/2012 8:34:36 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1463 | View Replies]

To: make no mistake

“You talk like a poor little RICH kid. Try moving to CA and then maybe you can appreciate Perry=Conservative”

So your definition of a conservative is anything to the right of California.

...no wonder you like Perry so much.


1,505 posted on 01/07/2012 8:34:36 PM PST by BobL ("Heartless" and "Inhumane" FReepers for Cain - we've HAD ENOUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1458 | View Replies]

To: BobL

You’re right although he WILL pull from our side. But the Texan twerp doesn’t care.


1,506 posted on 01/07/2012 8:34:41 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Rush even refered to Perry as the most Conservative.
I heard Rush say that he liked Perry, but I’ve never heard him claim that he’s the “most conservative” candidate in the race.

_______________________

Rush said that Perry is his dream candidate.
http://gretawire.blogs.foxnews.com/rush-limbaugh-on-the-record-3/


1,507 posted on 01/07/2012 8:35:06 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1414 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Then why don’t you explain why the voters don’t think so? Why don’t you explain to the rest of us why, if Perry is the most conservative, he isn’t running away with this.

Two mistakes, one calling voters "heartless". Americans are way too thin-skinned to let that ride even though it has zero to do with leading the country. And two his senior moment though it's been reported he was right out of surgery and on meds. But the msm, libs, and Dems pounded the airways and chatrooms with the "he's blown it" rhetoric until it became fact.

What's truly sad is that we are going to let two minor slips keep our best hope for a true Conservative in the WH from happening.

1,508 posted on 01/07/2012 8:35:20 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1471 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Iraq is in 3rd or 4th place on our list of problems in that region. Our biggest problems are our artificial reliance on Middle Eastern oil, an unstable Pakistan and its nukes, and Iran. If we don't address those other problems, Iraq will not matter, and we can prop up Iraq for decades to come, but it still won't address the other three problems.

The top five exporting countries accounted for 69 percent of United States crude oil imports in September 2011 while the top ten sources accounted for approximately 88 percent of all U.S. crude oil imports. The top five sources of US crude oil imports for September were Canada (2,324 thousand barrels per day), Saudi Arabia (1,465 thousand barrels per day), Mexico (1,099 thousand barrels per day), Venezuela (759 thousand barrels per day) and Nigeria (529 thousand barrels per day).

The rest of the top ten sources, in order, were Colombia (510 thousand barrels per day), Iraq (403 thousand barrels per day), Ecuador (299 thousand barrels per day), Angola (283 thousand barrels per day) and Russia (275 thousand barrels per day). Total crude oil imports averaged 9,006 thousand barrels per day in September, which is a decrease of (16) thousand barrels per day from August 2011.

We only get about 15% of our oil from the Saudis. It is not an artificial reliance until we get our own. And the Saudis will have no problem selling their oil to someone else.

We don't rely on Pakistan, but rather, we have strategic national interests that require us to seek viable bilateral relations. Our relationship with Pakistan has been something of a roller coaster ride ovfer a number of years. The war in Afghanistan forced us to seek better relations so we could support our forces in Afghanistan transiting Pakistan.

Iraq occupies an important strategic position in the region. What happens there will affect our relationships with other countries including Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf countries. Iran seeks hegemony over the region. If they acquire nuclear weapons, you can expect the Saudis and others to do the same thing. This will have serious implications for Israel. Remember how upset the Israelis got when they found out that the Saudis were acquiring IRBMs from China in the mid-80s?

That's why I liked Gingrich's take on the situation - Pakistan, Iran, and Middle Eastern oil are all much bigger regional problems.

Newt, as usual, is talking thru his hat. You can't isolate one problem from another or somehow address them in a hierarchical fashion. What happens in Iraq will affect Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the region and vice versa.

1,509 posted on 01/07/2012 8:35:30 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1308 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
OOOPS on me! I'd best refresh the FReepathon thread!
I have been derelict.
1,510 posted on 01/07/2012 8:35:52 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"Psssssssttt. Mormons account for only about 1.6% of the U.S. population"

I know that, I said that 95% of his caucus voter are Mormons, and they are all turning out. And you cannot hit Romney with negative ads and gather support from is voters like the rest of the field.

Also not one person up there (except Paul) will go after him due to the fear of potentially starring in a democrat campaign Ad.

The way this is going everyone up there looks like they know who has been chosen by the GOP king makers.

1,511 posted on 01/07/2012 8:35:52 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1441 | View Replies]

To: CARTOUCHE

really then tell me how many queers vote as a conservative seeing as we think that marriage is between one man and a woman, or that homosexuals are mentally unfit to serve, Mannings the latest example.

homosexuals conservative, YEA RIGHT.


1,512 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:10 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Of course, Rush would NEVER say that because it’s not close to being true.


1,513 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:18 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1499 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

“It would be easier to wade the Rio Grande than to wade through all the contorted BS some people on FR post about Perry. “

...and yet another FACT-FILLED statement proving that Perry is conservative.


1,514 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:26 PM PST by BobL ("Heartless" and "Inhumane" FReepers for Cain - we've HAD ENOUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1473 | View Replies]

To: BobL
If Rush would do 5 minutes of research in Texas, he’ll get that Perry=conservative delusion right out of his head.

I have that same thought every time I hear Rush wax enthusiastic about Perry.

In my view, Perry is a middle of the road moderate at best. There is just far too much in his record that goes against the conservative grain for me to grant him the designation of a true conservative.

The man can talk like one when he wants to (usually at election time), but I live in Texas, and have never seen this mythical "conservative" Perry I keep hearing about.

1,515 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:45 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1424 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
In fairness to the Romney family, Mitt's father, George. was born in 1907 and was thus beyond the draft age not long after Pearl Harbor. George's father, Gaskell Romney, was born in Mexico in 1871 and emigrated to the U.S. in 1912. Gaskell would have been ineligible for the World War I draft. As for the rest, Santorum was born in 1958 and came of age after abolition of the draft. Perry and Paul served in the military; the remainder, Mitt Romney included, successfully obtained deferments.
1,516 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:56 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1444 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
In fairness to the Romney family, Mitt's father, George. was born in 1907 and was thus beyond the draft age not long after Pearl Harbor. George's father, Gaskell Romney, was born in Mexico in 1871 and emigrated to the U.S. in 1912. Gaskell would have been ineligible for the World War I draft. As for the rest, Santorum was born in 1958 and came of age after abolition of the draft. Perry and Paul served in the military; the remainder, Mitt Romney included, successfully obtained deferments.
1,517 posted on 01/07/2012 8:36:56 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1444 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
In fairness to the Romney family, Mitt's father, George. was born in 1907 and was thus beyond the draft age not long after Pearl Harbor. George's father, Gaskell Romney, was born in Mexico in 1871 and emigrated to the U.S. in 1912. Gaskell would have been ineligible for the World War I draft. As for the rest, Santorum was born in 1958 and came of age after abolition of the draft. Perry and Paul served in the military; the remainder, Mitt Romney included, successfully obtained deferments.
1,518 posted on 01/07/2012 8:37:07 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1444 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

She is. I guess that is why Mike Nichols still pumps out crappy movies. He is hitting that like a red headed step child.


1,519 posted on 01/07/2012 8:37:14 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1474 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

What part of the MSM having to have a “person of color” don’t you understand?


1,520 posted on 01/07/2012 8:37:14 PM PST by navydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1290 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 1,781-1,798 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson