Skip to comments.
CNN Iowa poll: Romney 25, Paul 22, Santorum 16, Gingrich 14
HotAir ^
| 12/28/2011
| ALLAHPUNDIT
Posted on 12/28/2011 2:29:52 PM PST by TBBT
You know who this benefits?
*snip*
So theres the long-awaited Santorum surge among social cons, who are finally giving him a first look at the perfect moment after flirtations this fall with Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Gingrich. Two caveats, though, one minor and one major. The minor: PPPs poll published this morning found Santorum stuck at 10 percent, still behind Gingrich and Bachmann. Are their numbers the outlier or are CNNs? The major: According to the crosstabs, CNN only polled
registered Republicans in Iowa. That means theyre badly underestimating support for Paul, whos cleaning up among Democrats and independents who are planning to vote in the caucuses.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Hoodat
Obviously, you do not share those views.Don't speak for me. You're not smart enough.
To: TexasFreeper2009
That still remains a possibility.
However, if this poll is accurate and Santorum has surged, even finishing third could make him a real player for the nomination.
I'll admit that back in September I wasn't even looking at Santorum. But, given the current candidates (with apologies to Perry and Gingrich supporters), Santorum’s Conservative credentials are second to none.
Given that he also articulates Conservative values quite well (as compared to Perry) and he doesn't have any real baggage (like Gingrich), what's not to like? All he's been lacking is traction and money. A strong showing in Iowa will fix that, and also put him in the spotlight on a National level, bringing with it the slings and arrows from the media. Should we get to that point, we will see if he is as good a campaigner as he claims to be.
To: mylife
This will help nominate Romney. Split the vote, and he will be the nominee. Period. Seen this one before, and the conservatives live on just long enough to split the South Carolina vote, and let Mitt in. We never learn.
43
posted on
12/28/2011 3:49:40 PM PST
by
david1313
(Newt all the way)
To: ncalburt
The Ron Oaul voters have been Outed as Democrats who took advantage if the weak IA.
Yea, 'democrats' who want to abolish the IRS and cut 1 trillion in spending and abolish 5 cabinent agencies and cut foreign aid to zero? i don't know how you get more conservative than that, unless 'conservative' means something else nowadays.
44
posted on
12/28/2011 3:50:13 PM PST
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: TBBT
Good. Iowa is always wrong.
To: TBBT
I’d be very happy with a Santorum presidency!
Newt is better able to humiliate the MSM and Zero but Santorum seems like a great conservative choice.
46
posted on
12/28/2011 3:54:36 PM PST
by
Bobalu
(even Jesus knew the poor would always be with us)
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: ejonesie22
48
posted on
12/28/2011 4:00:54 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Santorum..., are you giving it some thought? I knew you would.)
To: montag813
Each election cycle we repeat the same mistakes. Of course Iowa is important, why would so much money be going there. We are just silly enough to read something into Iowa which affects N.H. which in turn makes a difference in South Carolina. I will not vote for Mitt, he is no better than Obama. There I said it.
49
posted on
12/28/2011 4:00:54 PM PST
by
david1313
(Newt all the way)
To: FreeReign
So you share those views, yet are voting for someone who does not. Got it.
50
posted on
12/28/2011 4:02:45 PM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: bwc2221
Well I hope he is, and doesn’t turn into the next shooting star.
51
posted on
12/28/2011 4:04:45 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Santorum..., are you giving it some thought? I knew you would.)
To: ncalburt
"The Ron Oaul voters have been Outed as Democrats who took advantage if the weak IA"
The one problem with that theory is the results of the poll posted here. This is a poll of only registered Republicans and Ron Paul comes in a close second. If you add Democrats and independents to the mix, he is in the lead, as indicated in other polls that take such voters into account. The numbers show that Ron Paul's support consists of a diverse coalition of Democrats, independents and Republicans. IOW, whatever one may think of Ron Paul, the coalition of supporters backing him is far more diverse than such narrow stereotypes.
52
posted on
12/28/2011 4:12:27 PM PST
by
rob777
Comment #53 Removed by Moderator
To: TBBT
54
posted on
12/28/2011 4:19:49 PM PST
by
muddler
(Chaos is coming..)
To: mamelukesabre
Will Santorum be on the ballot in all 50 states?
55
posted on
12/28/2011 4:23:50 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
(The thing that counts is not what we could do, but what we actually do. -- Leo Spears)
To: montag813; potlatch
![](http://domania.us/Oaccess/JOKER/DOLT.jpg)
Don't you respect the IOWA (subsidized) ethanol lobby?
56
posted on
12/28/2011 4:24:58 PM PST
by
devolve
(- - - - - - - - - - - SHIP OF FOOLS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -)
To: rob777
In addition, Ron Paul is polling 2nd in Iowa among Evangelicals:
Most of Santorums gains have come among likely caucus participants who are born-again or evangelical, and he now tops the list among that crucial voting bloc, with support from 22% of born-agains compared to 18% for Paul, 16% for Romney, and 14% for Gingrich,
57
posted on
12/28/2011 4:31:22 PM PST
by
rob777
To: Sudetenland
Your sick. I truly believe you are a liberal. Santorum is the most conservative of all of them and you are bashing him. You continue to want your liberal Romney and Newt and I pray every day that you do NOT get your wish.
58
posted on
12/28/2011 4:37:38 PM PST
by
napscoordinator
(Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
To: montag813
I AM SO G******D SICK OF STUPID IOWA! You've got tenure and seniority over me so I'll respect any harsh remarks that you may see fit to fling my way. That said, may I humbly and with all due respect ask that you not take the Lord's name in vain. I'm not a prude and I really don't mind some mild cussing but would prefer that the name of Almighty God is used in such a manner. That kind of foul language is best left to the Jeremiah Wrights of the world.
Thank you very kindly.
Sincerely and as a Christian FRiend.
59
posted on
12/28/2011 4:38:44 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
To: TBBT
Unbelievable. You are supposed to be a conservative yourself and you keep saying “they” “they” “they”. What the heck are you?????
60
posted on
12/28/2011 4:39:28 PM PST
by
napscoordinator
(Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson