How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality ^ | November 10, 2011 | Peter LaBarbera

[Diago]

News Release
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality

November 10, 2011; Contact: Peter LaBarbera: americansfortruth@gmail.com

CHICAGO—The discovery that former Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky has been molesting boys as young as 10 years old – and that university officials including head coach Joe Paterno did not do more to apprehend this predator – has shocked America. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said the scandal exposes the continuing problem of homosexual predators in society. He offers the following observations related to the PSU scandal:

• Many openly homosexual (“gay”) men, like CNN anchor Don Lemon, were molested as boys or experienced abnormally early sexualization. Yet many of these same men do NOT see their boyhood victimization at the hands of homosexual male predators as causing their homosexuality. (This is due partly to the success of the modern “gay” movement that falsely ascribes “gayness” to a person’s (innate) identity, and emphasizes the ambiguous notion of “sexual orientation” as opposed to behavior that is sinful, destructive and changeable.)
• Thus, how many boy victims of homosexual predator Sandusky will end up believing that being homosexual (“gay”) is “who they are”? How many will struggle with sexual identity issues? And how many will be told by LGBT advocates and liberal-minded people just to “accept being gay” as “who they are” because they were “born that way”?

• Because the media and academia have largely become apologists for the modern homosexualist movement, they downplay or ignore obvious causative factors in the formation of “gay” identity – including pederastic molestation. CNN’s Lemon is a case in point: he is now an “out gay” celebrity, yet few question the absurdity of him not associating the molestation of his youth with his later embrace of homosexuality as a positive identity.
• There IS a long history connecting homosexuality to pederasty, and a disproportionate link between homosexuality and pedophilia: why else would so many child molestation victims be boys when only 1-3 percent of the population is homosexual? Since cases of women molesting boys remain rare, if homosexuality were not such a strong factor, nearly all of pedophile victims should be girls, which is far from the case.
• Sandusky is married but obviously has a homosexuality (perversion) problem. Yet pro-“gay” liberals will deny any linkage between homosexuality and Sandusky’s rape/seduction of boys. In fact, after news of the Penn State scandal came to light, “gay” activists stressed that Sandusky is married and that most pedophile cases involve “straight, married men.” However, behavior is what matters – not a person’s marital status or self-described “sexual orientation.” Sandusky was married but was he really “straight” (sexually or morally)? Some inner demons or life traumas – probably in his own youth – caused him to lust for boys, wrecking untold misery in the lives of his victims. Behavior is the issue, and this was a case of a serial homosexual predator raping boys.

[Travis McGee]

That's one nice anecdote, proving zip, against countless examples of pederastic sodomite grooming.

[ClearBlueSky]

Excellent question. THE point here. The elephant in the room no one wants to speak of in plain language.
The answer is, of course, NEVER, IF you have morals. If you are of the ‘its all good’ mindset then the answer is ___ is more important than sex, of any kind!
IMO- there are only two sides to this sick mess.
The Stand Up crowd, and the Bend Over crowd.
The people who defend the victims and those who defend the victimizers.
If you defend the victimizers- in any way- you’re a Butt Buddy. A ‘receiver’, a ‘pitcher’ or both.
Pick a side.
Live with the label.

[JoenTX]

You can’t be that thick.

Not all pedophiles and child molesters are gay. Not all fundamental LDS-types are pedophiles. What we’re talking about here is the casting with a broad brush. Most definitely, some of each are, but many of each definitely are not.

You cannot say that any one type of sexual deviancy is a product of a certain religion or political thinking or whatever. There are plenty, plenty, of good “Christian” males victimizing underage girls in this country and elsewhere. We read about it everyday. Not every Muslim or person raised in a Muslim country has some undying thirst for young boys.

What if Sandusky had been doing this with underage girls? You don’t think that this is happening RIGHT NOW in this country? You’re dead stupid if not.

Wake the Hell up and join reality with the rest of us, please....

[Travis McGee]

Yes, yes, yes.

And we heterosexual men can’t hope for women to save us on this one. We need to be the ones to push back against the sodomite agenda.

I weep for the kids enrolling at our thousands of Predatory Sodomte Universities, where everything Sandusky did is lauded and praised, as long as the kids are a day over 18.

And after years of PC grooming (”Glee” etc), they don’t even have the means to resist homosexual overtures.

I for one vow to never again fall for their agenda, for example, by using the term “gay.” From now on, they are HOMOSEXUALS, PREDATORS, PEDERASTS, and SODOMITES.

If we don’t defend our children from them, WHO WILL? Not college presidents like PSU’s “most gay-friendly campus in America” Spanier.

[Travis McGee]

Please learn the difference between PEDERAST and PEDOPHILE.

The difference is crucial to winning this contest for our children.

[momtothree]

I agree, Travis! Have you noticed how very few (if any) of the news report/articles written about this case ever mention the word HOMOSEXUAL? I personally haven’t seen one yet. We have read “inappropriate touching” and “child molestation” but the word HOMOSEXUAL is deleted for PC reasons only. Only some FReepers have actually questioned Sandusky’s “so called marriage” to his wife as a farce.

[JoenTX]

It’s my personal experience. A very real and genuine one. And, you may go to Hell.

It’s the same kind of experience that happens hundreds of times everyday in this country. It’s not molestation. It’s not “the media.” It is however something within people that we can’t explain and thus apply the “deviant” label too as a soft, comfortable, warm excuse to make ourselves feel better about ourselves.

I assume you are an adult. Wise up.

[Travis McGee]

I note your single anecdote in favor of homosexual predestination.

[SaraJohnson]

I understand how you feel about the Freepers supporting Paterno. But I assume most are not supporting the homosexual rape of boys rather are ignorant of or reject the cultural norm of imposing Western ethical standards and expectation on institutions and the leaders of those institutions.

So, the conflict here is a rejection of the idea that Paterno had an ethical duty, which goes beyond his legalese duty, to protect other children from being molested in the “charity” by personally exposing Sandusky publically and criminally even as his supervisors decided to cover it up.

The conflict on these threads is the usual culture war theme: amoral humanist culture where there is a void of human soul. Humanists view man and life is purely material and everything else is choices we make to best serve self. Western culture sees man as an ethical being struggling to do the right thing (building and demonstrating character) over self interest (materialism, gain and physical gratification) to protect honor, human innocence, life and well being.

In humanist culture a person’s value is measured in dollars and cents. You are valuable and wonderful if you are successful materially. In western cutlure, value is measured in the demonstration love, honor or character and success is something that results from that state of being.

So to Freepers of western culture, Paterno failed his ethical duty as a leader becuase they did not go the extra mile to wreck Sandusky’s boy sex operation. But to humanists, he took the steps legally required of him and it was not his duty to protect children in a larger sense.

It is the same old, same old.

[texas_mrs]

I have always wondered about this. In the mid 70’s, I worked for a couple whose oldest son was gay and had moved to California. The mom told me an old (and the man was OLD) family acquaintance molested him as a boy and the son actually blamed this as the reason for his being gay. The son died in the late 70’s of an unknown disease, which took him very suddenly. I’ve always believed it was AIDS, which was not yet heard of at that time. No one even went to get his belongings or attend his funeral.

[JoenTX]

“Please learn the difference between PEDERAST and PEDOPHILE....”

Huh...?

Are you suggesting that there are different, nee explainable, degrees of child molestation? As in a “pederast” is at least culturally explainable while non-cultural contact is pedophilia?

I seriously don’t get your post here.

[JoenTX]

And I note your intense, violent rejection of reality and the evidence around you.

And?

[Psycho_Bunny]

Are you basing that on projected anger, or experience?

I’m basing my opinion on years of group therapy, where I’ve come to the conclusion that men who were abused by men are on the other-side of the same coin as those of us who were abused by women.

There are different fundamental issues but many problems that are shared across the board: an inability to trust people, the pushing away of people who get too close, nightmares....panic attacks....severe depression....a nagging voice in the back of your head that inevitably asks of almost everyone you meet “What child is this asshole having sex with?”

But, there are big differences....people in your situation tend to develop knee-jerk hatred of - specifically - men. People like me don’t have that anger. We have distrust because men are adults but not because they’re men.

I could go on but, there’s really no point. You’ll have your belief and I’ll have mine.

We are “Brothers In Problems”, though.

[blueunicorn6]

Answer yes or no.....do you enjoy killing kittens? If someone disagrees with you, they are “thick”? “Casting with a broad brush”? Ummmm.....you’re out of your league.

[SaraJohnson]

I suspect that the boys that Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics. Since the organization was for “troubled kids”, parents likely sent their young boys hoping this all star team would help their sons “man up”.

---

That would be an incorrect assumption. Sandusky picked his victims based on how weak or strong they were in resisting when he began grooming them (touching their knees, thighs in the car or obeying him in the showers to stand closer to him in the shower room). Homo boy rapists operate in a mentality of dominance and abuse; not sex.

But homo rapists, in the mental war they run on a boy, tells the boy that he’s in the predicament of sexual abuse because he’s queer (not manning up). If he was not queer, he would not have allowed the pervert to touch him.

So by accident, you stumbled into the trap the rapists use on their victims to control them with self guilt and shame for what the pervert is doing to them.

[SaraJohnson]

Boy sexual grooming and rape is the way homos reproduce.

[SaraJohnson]

Boy sexual grooming and rape is the way homos reproduce.

[FourPeas]

How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?

I belong to a group that helps a certain type of "troubled" people many of whom were molested as children. Of the men who were assaulted by homosexual men, most consider themselves homosexual. (Conversely, the women who were raped as a child (by a man) tend to consider themselves either lesbian or bisexual.)

The impact to society of Sandusky's deviancy is huge. There are now dozens(?) of potential predators out there. And if, by the grace of God, they're able to escape that, these men are likely to face a lifetime of emotional, sexual and social problems.

[ResponseAbility]

****They want to be around someone who can teach them how to fish, how to play a sport, why they should open a door for a woman?****

It is more important to talk to (and live through example) your kids about right and wrong, why a work ethic is good, how to love your neighbor as God intends, how to have a relationship with Jesus and the Father through the Holy Spirit, how to be fiscally sound...These are the things that make a person whole.

[Lazamataz]

Restoring the Republic involves a LOT more than electing the right people. A return to moral clarity is required. It's all well and good to rail on the queers, but celebrating heterosexual lust is to be equally railed against.

OTOH, I'd hit it.