Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times: Did Sarah Palin really say that? Wow.
New York Times via The American Conservative ^ | September 9, 2011 | Rod Dreher

Posted on 09/09/2011 8:27:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Edited on 09/10/2011 11:06:03 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Sarah Palin said some amazing and terrific things the other day

(Excerpt) Read more at amconmag.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bachmann; cantwinmeme; corporatism; cronycapitalism; dsj; economy; enemedia; indianola; iowa; obama; palin; palinpolicy; palinpredictions; palinpunditry; perry; populist; roddreher; stayonsidelinesmeme; teaparty; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-350 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The New York Times, in which a columnist points out that we’re so used to goofiness coming from Palin

Correction: you're so used to getting away with exaggerating, or making up goofiness and getting away with it.

81 posted on 09/09/2011 9:55:35 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Promote Liberal Extinction: Support gay marriage and abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Read the last part where they say she shouldn’t run. That’s what they’re really up to.


82 posted on 09/09/2011 9:55:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Good, thanks


83 posted on 09/09/2011 9:56:26 PM PDT by munin ( So, which of these winners calley, mookie will get his worrd the cops and generated public costs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan; reasonisfaith
That was canned BS rhetoric, prepared by the McCain people, I guarantee. Those are not Sarah’s words. Bob

But SHE SAID THOSE WORDS. It may have been canned BS fed to her by some campaign lackey, but when they came out of her mouth SHE OWNED THEM!!!

So was she being dishonest, or was she really in favor of the TARP bailout?

I believe she was really in favor of the TARP bailouts.

But a lot of her current supporters think she was lying.

I don't get it.

84 posted on 09/09/2011 9:56:50 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
it sounds like she is planning to do to washington what she did for alaska~! and please, dear God let her be successful !!!


AMEN!

85 posted on 09/09/2011 9:57:00 PM PDT by B-Cause (The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Rep. Ron Paul has already run a third party campaign:

And let us pray that Sarah Palin doesn't do something that stupid.

86 posted on 09/09/2011 9:58:17 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

True. Health premiums.


87 posted on 09/09/2011 10:00:33 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: madison10
IMO she’s going to go third party.

A moronic move. This is a two party country. To go third party and have any hope of winning, you first have to demolish the GOP to the point of insignificance. That's a tall order.

The task at hand is to take over the GOP and marginalize the establishment RINOs.

And to vote for the GOP nominee, no matter who it is — even Willard, although, thanks to Rick Perry, that now seems unlikely.

88 posted on 09/09/2011 10:05:44 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
What polls?

Well, here are just a few from the last 2 years:

Source Date A-D-U
WaPo 3/27/10 37-55-8
NBC/WSJ 6/24/10 29-52-19
CBS 10/6/10 22-48-29
Gallup 1/19/11 38-53-9
CNN 1/19/11 38-56-6
Bloomberg 3/10/11 28-60-12
NBC/WSJ 6/15/11 24-54-22

Note: A-D-U = Approval-Disapproval-Undecided

So as you can see, her disapproval rating is pretty consistent over a long time and across all polling companies and methodologies.

89 posted on 09/09/2011 10:07:05 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

You think people would have gotten a clue when all those emails were released and they didn’t find anything. There was not ONE thing they could spin and make it appear to be a possible scandal. She was that clean. I still can’t believe it...


90 posted on 09/09/2011 10:08:22 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Promote Liberal Extinction: Support gay marriage and abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sklar
Many complain that the current runners are politicians and we need another type of leader,
then one comes along and isn't politician enough.

If she runs, she wins against the GOP.

IMO Perry and Romney are no better than Bush43/ McCain /and Dole.
Kick them all in the balls like Reagan did!!

91 posted on 09/09/2011 10:09:02 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Palter
Hard to be against the political elite when you ran with John McCain.


92 posted on 09/09/2011 10:11:43 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just another PDS concern idjit.


93 posted on 09/09/2011 10:11:48 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Your math is a little more than weird.

No. Take a look at my post with the poll results. Sarah has polled between 50-60% disapproval rating for almost 2 years straight. That is very persistent negatives. The latest numbers I have seen show her negatives over 60%, but I am giving her the benefit of ascribing the lower negative number to her. She has also consistently had more than 50% of people polled say they would not vote for her.

94 posted on 09/09/2011 10:12:58 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

If the Times occasionally starts writing articles like this it might help lift the fog. Now we’re finally getting some facts about this women from the State run media instead of the usual “she’s stupid” demagoguery.


95 posted on 09/09/2011 10:14:08 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Promote Liberal Extinction: Support gay marriage and abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Palter

Another PDS, fill in the blanks__________________ _______________ ________________.


96 posted on 09/09/2011 10:16:04 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Another one of the, she is not good enough to run for president, but she would make a great diva to irritate the elites.


97 posted on 09/09/2011 10:19:50 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Well, I have not heard or seen any indication in any reputable source that she will run third party , so I don’t think she will be WORSE...

for God’s sake, she was the GOP VP NOMINEE.


98 posted on 09/09/2011 10:19:56 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Where are all the questions and details?

Polls are used to push opinions generally, rather than gauge opinions. Without seeing the details that I mentioned above, they’re pretty useless.


99 posted on 09/09/2011 10:20:03 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: munin
IMO she’s going to go third party

You haven't read her book, "Going Rogue", have you?

She'll never go third party.

100 posted on 09/09/2011 10:21:01 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson