Posted on 07/13/2011 5:45:49 PM PDT by montag813
The American Psychological Association needs to create a new ICD-9 code for Palin Derangement Syndrome (maybe 201.2?). The Washington Posts Jonathan Capehart ripped into Sarah Palin for the above images:
Folks want to be able to envision someone sitting in the Oval Office. They dont necessarily want to envision them in the pages of Esquire magazines Sexiest Woman Alive 2011 or Maxim. She cant possibly be taken seriously as a presidential contender dressed like that, especially since this is the second time she has graced Newsweek in a less-than-presidential pose.Are you kidding me? Maxim?! She is wearing a sweatshirt, not thong underwear and stilettos! And that first image from NewsWEAK was co-opted from a previous article in a RUNNING magazine. What about the photos of Obama in his mom jeans, is that presidential? Of course it is, because he is a man. A nice Marxist man, so his questionable fashion choices, and girly man pitches, are oh so presidential.
NY Magazine writes:
But we confess we found his mom jeans kind of endearing, because they're just the kind of thing normal nerdy dads would wear totally oblivious to the fact that they're anything but fashionable.George W. Bush was often photographed in sports gear, since he ran ever morning at 5am. No one was criticizing that. What about the shirtless photos of Obama? Are those presidential?
Again we ask, where is NOW, Ms. Magazine, etc. on this? Are they for womens rights or not? Where are the little Feministing girls? Too busy trying to reclaim the word slut and reinvent the free love movement, so that women can have more abortions?
Most on FR know this but even so, few people really take a moment to ponder the implications of what it means...and we all REALLY need to... “Media at every level thinks you are literally stupid. Therefore you must be told what to think by your betters.”
Why was critical thinking and learning how’ to learn removed from education? There’s your answer.
Like Ubama is Presidential?
Must be gay. Doesn’t mention Obamas unsightly man-boobs but has a problem with Sarah’s knock-out figure.
She looks ready to take on the world.
Oops. Shoulda read further down.
There was a picture of him standing in front of the desk in the Oval Office at 10 in the AM in a dry sweat jacket and pants.
How is it Palins responsibility to pick a cover photo for Newsweek? Is the writers point that she should never be seen in casual clothes?
And I'm often embarrassed by how Fox babes dress!
The scary part is that most of us would probably rather have Putin that Zero! The cool thing is that Palin seems to be about as fearless as Vlad is ;)
I didn’t know Sarah Palin was President. When was the election?
Palin is so naturally lovely that she could make a burlap sack look hot. As for the presidentiality of her wardrobe, we’ll have to wait another 558 days to find out the truth. That’ll be January 20, 2013, her inauguration day.
What’s wrong with the photo?? Is it because she has boobs?
I hate to say it but Sarah looks really HAWT in that gray sweater.
ya!
She shoulda asked Hillary what to wear!
Yup. Bottom line. I actually have a lot of respect for Putin for that very reason. Unfortunately, there are far too many other reasons NOT to like the guy.
At least with VP, he does not hide who or what he is. BO is far more evil than VP IMO, but with none of the love of country attached. AND he hides who and what he is.
Gay men prefer women who look like young boys. Take a look at today’s so-called “supermodels”. Not a Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford or Kathy Ireland in sight. Seriously.
Boobs=Bad.
Looks like she is in Alaska; probably just ran 5 miles, shot dinner and chopped wood. Sarah, please wear your Jimmy Choos and Channel when you do that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.