Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sexist Reporter Claims Palin’s Outfit “Unpresidential”, Ignores Obama’s “Mom Jeans”
RealFeminist.com ^ | 07-13-2011 | Sheri Urban

Posted on 07/13/2011 5:45:49 PM PDT by montag813

The American Psychological Association needs to create a new ICD-9 code for Palin Derangement Syndrome (maybe 201.2?). The Washington Post‘s Jonathan Capehart ripped into Sarah Palin for the above images:

Folks want to be able to envision someone sitting in the Oval Office. They don’t necessarily want to envision them in the pages of Esquire magazine’s “Sexiest Woman Alive 2011” or Maxim. She can’t possibly be taken seriously as a presidential contender dressed like that, especially since this is the second time she has graced Newsweek in a less-than-presidential pose.
Are you kidding me? Maxim?! She is wearing a sweatshirt, not thong underwear and stilettos! And that first image from NewsWEAK was co-opted from a previous article in a RUNNING magazine. What about the photos of Obama in his mom jeans, is that presidential? Of course it is, because he is a man. A nice Marxist man, so his questionable fashion choices, and girly man pitches, are oh so presidential.

NY Magazine writes:

But we confess we found his mom jeans kind of endearing, because they're just the kind of thing normal nerdy dads would wear totally oblivious to the fact that they're anything but fashionable.
George W. Bush was often photographed in sports gear, since he ran ever morning at 5am. No one was criticizing that. What about the shirtless photos of Obama? Are those “presidential”?

Again we ask, where is NOW, Ms. Magazine, etc. on this? Are they for women’s rights or not? Where are the little Feministing girls? Too busy trying to reclaim the word “slut” and reinvent the free love movement, so that women can have more abortions?

 

Mom jeans song:



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; newsweek; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2011 5:45:54 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: montag813
Getting in early on a Palin thread (before it gets too hot in here) is an answer to the question

What is the value of Free Republic?

2 posted on 07/13/2011 5:48:12 PM PDT by don-o (Abolish FReepathons. Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Pretty sad when that statement has to be made. True, but sad.


3 posted on 07/13/2011 5:51:57 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Bet this Democrat journalist never said a word when Billy Jeff Clinton graced the Oval Office with his flabby white thighs in running shorts....eeeshh. And we won’t even mention his outrageous behavior in said office.


4 posted on 07/13/2011 5:52:27 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“Folks want to be able to envision someone sitting in the Oval Office.”

Yeah right. Like Billy Jeff Clinton getting “BJ’s” in the Oval Office from a 22 year old intern and then finishing the “job” himself in the sink in the adjacent Study.

Damn hypocrites.


5 posted on 07/13/2011 5:53:54 PM PDT by Joe Marine 76 ("It's The Natural Born Citizenship, Stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Jonathan Capehart is a queer. Uh, I mean a fag. Er, gay...

I'm not sure I care what he thinks about fashion or anything else. I'm not too keen on the feces eaters. But that is just me.

6 posted on 07/13/2011 5:54:25 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Extremely sad and BTW, you have mail.


7 posted on 07/13/2011 5:54:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

DONATE


8 posted on 07/13/2011 5:54:41 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

I think it’s funny (pathetic) that there was that Daily Mail article praising MOs fashion sense then lo and behold, here’s one critical of SP. JournOlist coordination is alive and well in the media.


9 posted on 07/13/2011 5:54:41 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Is there someone on the planet who didn’t know this was coming? The question then might go like this, “why the hell do it in the first place?” Sheesh.


10 posted on 07/13/2011 5:55:59 PM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Its early only with respect to this posting. The article has been posted at least twice if not three times already.

Now don’t let me slow you down, I’m sure that some have not seen this.


11 posted on 07/13/2011 5:57:11 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Palin’s Outfit “Unpresidential”,
Sorry, I missed the part where she was already elected let alone announce she's running.
12 posted on 07/13/2011 5:58:25 PM PDT by lewislynn ( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Gonna be some very scared mediots on election night. Suicides probably after. That would be a real shame.


13 posted on 07/13/2011 5:58:55 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Sexiest Woman Alive 2011” or Maxim.

Jonathon getting kind of catty.

14 posted on 07/13/2011 6:00:57 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Breitbart for a Pulitzer Prize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
As a gay man, Capehart may claim to be a fashion expert.

But he's made a few really questionable fashion choices himself:

I'd like to be able to say the photo was doctored, but there were people around at the time who saw and discussed his fashion faux pas.

15 posted on 07/13/2011 6:01:01 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

Read up sometime on Gay men and their opinions on women and fashion. Total misogyny and projection combined.

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2005/12/why-do-gay-men-dominate-fashion.html

“Michael Vollbracht, the current designer of Bill Blass, said he believes that gay men are demonstrably superior at design, their aesthetic formed by a perception of a woman as an idealized fantasy. “I come from a time when gay men dressed women,” Mr. Vollbracht said. “We didn’t bed them. Or at least I didn’t. I am someone who is really pro-homosexual. I am an elitist. I am better than straight people. Women are confused about who they want to be. I believe that male designers have the fantasy level that women do not.”...in an article by Ann Althouse


16 posted on 07/13/2011 6:05:09 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Sarah looks more Presidential in a pair of Carhartt jeans than Obama does in a suit.


17 posted on 07/13/2011 6:05:55 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I wasn’t aware that one had to look Presidential if one is not the President or even a candidate for said office.


18 posted on 07/13/2011 6:08:14 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

So what, Sarah isn’t the president....


19 posted on 07/13/2011 6:12:33 PM PDT by FrankR ("If you can't make them see the light, let them feel the heat." - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Living in their heads....rent free....and loving it.


20 posted on 07/13/2011 6:14:07 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson