Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals Court in Ohio Upholds Health Law (Requirement to buy Health Insurance is Constitutional)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 6/29/11 | P Landers

Posted on 06/29/2011 11:05:59 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

A federal appeals court in Cincinnati on Wednesday upheld the health-care law passed by Congress last year, saying the law's requirement for most Americans to carry insurance or pay a penalty is constitutional.

The vote was 2-1 on the three-judge panel on the key question of whether the insurance requirement exceeded Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The majority concluded that it did not.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: blackrobedtyrants; courts; fascism; health; healthcare; hussein; obamacare; ohio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last
To: screaminsunshine

I hate to even think you are right but its entirely possible that you are. If so we are facing the 1776 solution and its going to be ugly.


161 posted on 06/29/2011 9:52:53 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Danae

“I don’t think you are on the right website.”

Wrong website? Are you saying the website Free republic is not dedicated to the idea of a FREE republic, as apposed to an oligarchy of 9 federal employees in black robes.

Perhaps it is you with wild and demonstratively hopeless dilutions of appointing a new set of Dictators are on the wrong website...

“Quite frankly what you are saying sounds a lot like what a number of anarchists talk about.”

I ain’t no anarchist I am a Constitutional republican, and that means I support a Republican goverment of laws Not dictators in black robes.

“There is more than one way to skin a cat brother, and I am not interested in what you are discussing. Please leave me out of it.”

As you wish, but based upon your method despite endless attempts failing to even remove a hair from the Cat. I find myself doubting very much you ever had any desire to skin that cat.

Perhaps maybe your honest but simply insane... As Einstein said insanity is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different result. You and your predecessors have been at this for more then 100 years with results that are quite contradictory to your stated aim.


162 posted on 06/29/2011 10:03:29 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: musicman

;)


163 posted on 06/29/2011 10:07:54 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Coming from you, I wear a badge of *supreme* conservatism.


164 posted on 06/29/2011 10:23:01 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Sorry but no unfunded mandate of the states or the people is Constitutional. This isn’t a tax, it’s a requirement to buy something. This appeals court is dead wrong!

If we’re going down this road, let’s also make it a mandate that every American must purchase at least one gun.


165 posted on 06/29/2011 10:25:18 PM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

Ummm hummm.

You are the one talking about overthrowing a government. I am not into civil war, sorry that prospect daunts me. As it should you.

I prefer change from within.

Keep your illusions of superiority to yourself. I am not impressed, nor am I moved by your arguments of delusion to take up your point of view. Not even close.

Note: Insulting someone will not encourage them to listen to your position. You invalidate yourself and your point of view (worthy or not) with your hostility.

Don’t bother responding. It’s ok, I already know I am not ‘worthy’ of your time so save the bs. kthksbai.


166 posted on 06/29/2011 10:31:00 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Even if SCOTUS says it’s Constitutional, I refuse. It’s that simple. I’m not giving in.


167 posted on 06/29/2011 11:49:22 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (A Movement that does not move cannot call itself a Movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Absolutely insane. I hate seeing the courts play football with people’s lives and Constitutionally guaranteed inalienable rights. Get it to SCOTUS because they’re just spouting nonsense until then, IMHO.


168 posted on 06/30/2011 12:42:52 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Let’s count how many crimes that family in the painting is committing, where they living today:

1. The husband is openly carrying a rifle in public.
2. The rifle is loaded.
3. There is no gun lock on it, and being carried in an approved, lockable case.
4. He is disturbing the peace.
5. The girl is picking flowers. Are they on public land? Are the flowers endangered?
6. The woman is clutching a Bible... horrors!
7. I see erosion on the path. Do they have an EPA permit to walk there?

If these people lived today, they would already be detained and child welfare services would be coming to take the child away from them.

We are lost.


169 posted on 06/30/2011 1:03:16 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Brett11
This isn’t the kind of case in which Kennedy would vote with the liberals.

I wish I agreed, but I do not. The cases you reference are Lopez and Morrison, and in both cases Kennedy said that the laws in question were not about commercial matters (having a gun near a school and rape, so he's right). This one is clearly commercial. Read Kennedy's opinion in Lopez and you will see that his objections in that case do not apply to this one. He will vote to uphold the law.
170 posted on 06/30/2011 1:56:53 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: sport

“There is no gurantee that the Supreme Court will take the case.”

I would stake my life on the bet they will. In fact we are all betting our lives.


171 posted on 06/30/2011 3:21:50 AM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (I have a liberal arts degree, do you want fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: chris37

That’s my attitude, too.


172 posted on 06/30/2011 4:58:20 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat
Supposing that they do take the case,if this happens, there is an equal chance that they will, under their logic, find obamacare is Constitutional.

As you stated, we are literally betting our lives and the lives of our loved ones.

I don't like it, but the majority of those that voted do and did. That crap "I was duped", I was deceived" is a bunch of bullshit. obama never lied about what his plans were for this Nation. obamacare or "healthcare reform" happened to be one of them.

If there is any silver lining to an otherwise black cloud, is that the parasites that put him in the White House will eventually be eliminated by him also.

Getting back to our lives and the lives of our loved ones,if we will not fight with any means necessary to defend them,we deserve to lose them. And we will. The enemy no longer resides across the oceans. The enemy now resides within the continental boundries of the United States. And he intends to kill us just as dead as and German, Italian, Japanese, North Korean, Comminest Chinese soldier or Viet Cong would.

173 posted on 06/30/2011 5:50:17 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

But this one actually deals with inactivity, not an activity that could actually be called commerce. If the Supreme Court rules that the government can force people to buy health insurance, there will be absolutely no limits to the commerce clause.


174 posted on 06/30/2011 6:04:26 AM PDT by Brett11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
I understand that.

"Supreme conservatism" to you means agreeing wholeheartedly with leftist academia.

That's quite the admission, but I'm glad you acknowledged your unholy alliance. Too bad others of your 'super-con' friends don't recognize that your level of BDS lands you squarely in the la la land of the enemy.

You're a good sport for admitting it, dragnet. Thanks. :)

175 posted on 06/30/2011 6:13:38 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Your statement implied that Bush, having very little difference with Obama, wanted babies to be slaughtered, had no integrity, hated the country, is a Marxist dictator wannabe, had Marxist, Communist, Maoist, perverts as advisors, was completely incompentant, didn't care about doing his job right, never, ever told the truth, etc. etc.

The comparison was ludicrous, regardless of the fact that you imagine that he was a globalist (You obviously didn't pay any attention to his UN speeches, his refusal to sign Kyoto, etc., etc.......but that's a subject for another thread).

Words mean things, screamin. And when you say ridiculous things, don't expect rational people to agree with you.

We never will.

176 posted on 06/30/2011 6:20:30 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Try to shake it off. You have been duped.


177 posted on 06/30/2011 6:45:09 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Socialism...Easier said than done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Duped by knowing that Obama is an evil, pro-infanticide Marxist punk?

Duped by being staunchly pro-life and pro-military?

Duped by being a rational human being?

178 posted on 06/30/2011 7:04:00 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
btw, if you are unaware that Obama is an evil, pro-infanticide, Marxist punk, perhaps it is you who have been 'duped.'
179 posted on 06/30/2011 7:06:22 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Are you unable to think. I think Obama is even worse than Bush. But BOTH suck. Get a Brain.


180 posted on 06/30/2011 7:13:31 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Socialism...Easier said than done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson