Posted on 02/26/2011 10:23:51 AM PST by FromLori
President Obama issued an executive order Friday evening that imposes immediate sanctions on Libyan ruler Muammar al Qaddafi, his sons and his accomplices in the slaughter of civilians. In a letter accompanying the order, Obama declared a national emergency over the situation.
"I have determined that the actions of Colonel Muammar Qaddafi, his government, and close associates, including extreme measures against the people of Libya, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. The order declares a national emergency to deal with this threat," Obama wrote in the letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH).
The executive order itself condemns the "wanton violence against unarmed associates" perpetrated by Qaddafi, his sons, his government, and his close associates. Effective immediately, all U.S.-based assets of Qaddafi and his four sons are to be frozen and transactions intended to move those assets are prohibited. The order allows the measures to be expanded to include any member of the Libyan government who are determined to be complicit in Qaddafi's brutality.
In a personal statement issued by the White House at the same time as the order, Obama referenced what he called the Libyan government's continued violation of human rights, brutalization of its people, and outrageous threats.
"By any measure, Muammar el-Qaddafi's government has violated international norms and common decency and must be held accountable," the statement read. "We will stand steadfastly with the Libyan people in their demand for universal rights, and a government that is responsive to their aspirations. Their human dignity cannot be denied."
(Excerpt) Read more at thecable.foreignpolicy.com ...
In PA it was the license plate FRiend
I remember renting cars for my wedding party and making sure we had enough even and odd license plates to get everyone around
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_454893.html
He's notifying the Republicans (because he doesn't care about foreign matters)- He's preparing to take over here. He's already neutered the house and senate (czars), and the court (lawlessness).
He's trying to rally the unions to violence. If he can get that, "for our own good", the top will have to come down - with great force and power - to "save us."
The left creates a crises (real or imagined). People then cry out for a savior. The left, who already has the socialist/communist "remedy", will come in to save us from the very chaos they created. "Never waste a good (created) crises."
This is how they've gotten as far as they have today.
They tried to incite the TEA party to violence, but it didn't work. Nancy Pelosi was even trembling when she said she hadn't seen such violence like that of the TEA party since the protests of her youth. Since they couldn't get the right to be the source of the meltdown, they're going to use the left anyway. Their time is growing short. They're willing to sacrifice a few unwashed union members for the sake of the revolution.
Do NOT get drawn into it. Self restraint is very, very important right now. No crises = no socialist revolution!
All bark and no bite...just throwing out raw meat for those clinging to their guns and bibles....
The Muslim Brotherhood (worth checking out)
Food for thought... (wikipedia)
I know Wikipedia entries can be suspect. This material doesn’t seem to be gamed. In places it states MB stated policy, but seems to voice skepticism at the same time.
You’ll find individual descriptions of the MB in specific nations at the bottom.
I believe this is an entry worth checking out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood
Not only is the left here trying to incite the U.S. unions to violence, they're the ones who stared the unrest in Egypt that started this whole "oil crises" we're facing now.
In order to create a socialist society, the society in existence has to be destroyed first. Once destroyed, the people will cry out for a savior. Be he God or the devil, the people will accept him, and the new society can be rebuilt in the "saviors" own image.
Apparently Bush used this extensively after 9-11.
The big difference is the motives. Bush was interested in the well being of Americans.
Obama craves power, would not hesitate to use AGAINST Americans.
bttt
Look at what he's accomplished so far.
He wasted a trillion dollars on his "special interests."
He drove the deficit to unsustainable levels.
He's neutered the house and senate through czar authority.
He's ignoring the courts and the law.
States are in bankruptcy status.
Millions have lost their homes.
Unemployment is at @20%.
His union armies are starting to spam the nation in the name of social justice.
Government officials are engaging in lawlessness and denying the states their right to democracy.
His activist groups have set the middle east on fire, and the cost of oil is about to destroy what little there is left.
What will people do in the near future? They'll either go crazy and Oboma will have no choice but to declare marshal law and become dictator for life, or the system will crash so hard Oboma will have no choice but to declare marshal law and become dictator for life. Either way, Oboma is in a win win situation, and it was all created. Never waste a good created crises!
And he did it all in less than two years. "He destroyed wonderfully."
THANK YOU! I knew there was a reason.
Many here are apparently unaware that the United States has been under a state of emergency since September 14, 2001. The SOE in regards to Libya probably has more to do with economics and the relationship between the Libyans and US companies doing business there than anything else...
Was this before or after Motown night at the Whitey House?
>Qadaffi is now a real and present danger to the US?<
.
Not so, obammy is the real danger.
On Drudge now.
“Hopeless”. For sure we are almost there.
The cost of gas went up 17 cents while we were pumping gas on Wednesday.
“Apparently Bush used this extensively after 9-11.”
FWIW, we’ve BEEN in a national state of emergency ever since 9-11. Last September, Obama announced that it would continue for another year, i.e., until this coming September.
I believe the rationale for a new state of emergency is that each declaration has to specify what statutory authorities the president is invoking under his emergency powers that couldn’t be done without such a declaration (e.g., having Treasury seize assets etc.).
I don’t support or like Obama, but the reality is that if he’d want to abuse his powers under a state of emergency, the opportunity has been there ever since he took office. So we might want to dial down the rhetoric a bit over this newest move.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.