Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The level of bias is breathtaking.

Opinion is heartily mixed with occasional facts, in this State Run Media (ABC) article.

I seriously expect the following news headline from ABC by the end of the year: "Republicans Suck. They Are Demons From Hell. They Eat Infants."

1 posted on 01/31/2011 6:27:08 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Doing your job, today. LOL


2 posted on 01/31/2011 6:29:03 AM PST by Lazamataz (If Illegal Aliens are Undocumented Workers, then Thieves are Undocumented Shoppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

What part of “no funding or abortion” do these people not understand??

Even the Republicans don’t really seem to get it.


3 posted on 01/31/2011 6:29:26 AM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
"Raped" by her boyfriend, who she is still living with, qualifies her for government funded abortion?
4 posted on 01/31/2011 6:29:54 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Any politician who says they think it’s fine to butcher babies, no matter who pays for the butchery, should be impeached. In fact, they should probably be incarcerated as a danger to society as well.


7 posted on 01/31/2011 6:31:50 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Is a child a person? Of course. Which is why we MUST ban abortion NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Rape is only really rape if it involves force, according to the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law.

Rape involves force. Statuatory rape does not involved force. WTF?

10 posted on 01/31/2011 6:38:10 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Eventually a “blood libel” will come from their talking heads..............


16 posted on 01/31/2011 6:47:30 AM PST by Red Badger (Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
I seriously expect the following news headline from ABC by the end of the year: "Republicans Suck. They Are Demons From Hell. They Eat Infants."

...With ketchup.

17 posted on 01/31/2011 6:55:08 AM PST by Miss_Meyet (When I was young I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

The opinion that one should be pro-life with exception to rape/incest/health reasons/etc. almost makes less sense to me than being pro-abortion. By that logic, one should go around euthanizing the elderly and children who receive inadequate care simply because they’re ‘burdens’ on a family economy. I’d hazard a guess that many of these people who want abortion ‘exceptions’ are indifferent towards the coming death panels Obamacare is going to be mandating.


18 posted on 01/31/2011 6:55:22 AM PST by Objective Scrutator (Liberals are lazy, and objectively pro-lazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Why is the financing of the murder of unborn children a federal concern anyway? There is no interstate commerce involved.


19 posted on 01/31/2011 6:57:55 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

a woman walks into a pawn shop and hands the worker a diamond ring. After inspecting it, the jeweler says “I’m sorry, but this is not a real diamond.”

The woman screams “Call the police! I’ve just been raped!”


21 posted on 01/31/2011 6:59:01 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Feminists have already redefined rape ... to mean later regrets about a consensual act (among other things).


22 posted on 01/31/2011 6:59:32 AM PST by freespirited (Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

The first thing that jumped out at me, is the term “frcible rape,” which is a perfectly reasonable, descriptive term, which has been in use for many years, by Dems and Reps alike I am sure.


23 posted on 01/31/2011 6:59:46 AM PST by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Got the message, conservatives - why do you still watch ANYTHING on ABC?


24 posted on 01/31/2011 6:59:46 AM PST by Elwood P. Doud (America, you voted for a negro socialist with an Islamic name - so why act surprised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
There's very clear definitions in each state. They are creating a controversy that isn't there. "Forcible rape" is the old common law definition that almost always refers to anything that isn't strict liability (statutory). That includes date rape, drugs, etc.

I'm going to possibly take some heat here, but I go a lot further than the bill in my stance. Abortion should be banned and the only exception should be the life of the mother. Babies are innocent. They don't choose their sperm donors.

30 posted on 01/31/2011 7:03:45 AM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
There used to be a quasi-truce between the pro and anti-choice forces

Obscene bias. Neutral would be to use each camp's terminology for itself, thus pro-choice and pro-life. The author clearly states his bias as soon as he uses one camp's term for the other. Also no attempt to get a quote from the authors, only the opposition. At the very least a responsible journalist would have the last sentence be something "Calls to the authors of the bill were not returned."

32 posted on 01/31/2011 7:05:47 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I guess they mean what Whoopi calls Rape-Rape.


35 posted on 01/31/2011 7:08:05 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Force and that they file and not withdraw a rape report with the police, so if they live with the rapist their rapist goes to jail (if it isn't a croc to begin with).
39 posted on 01/31/2011 7:20:56 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

If you were going to have an exception for rape, it would have to have been reported to the police and a rape kit done at the ER.

Just saying “I was raped” wouldn’t cut it.


40 posted on 01/31/2011 7:27:00 AM PST by Grunthor (Enemy of the state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

First, there should be absolutely no federal funding of any abortion... none,nada.

Second, I am fairly sure the “left” democrats, under the guise of Whoopie Goldberg, redefined rape.. after all, if it isn’t “Rape Rape”........


43 posted on 01/31/2011 7:38:21 AM PST by Fantomw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

So, are they going to use the “Whoopster’s” definition and call it rape rape?


44 posted on 01/31/2011 7:38:45 AM PST by sniper63 (Did you plug the hole in the border yet daddy........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson