Not a final decision - just granted the stay.
1 posted on
01/25/2011 10:15:38 AM PST by
RightGeek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: RightGeek
...and a Supreme Court bought & paid for.
2 posted on
01/25/2011 10:17:02 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: FReepers
3 posted on
01/25/2011 10:17:59 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: RightGeek
Like there was ever any doubt.
4 posted on
01/25/2011 10:18:15 AM PST by
Jazz1968
To: RightGeek
Rahm should be thanking a certain magic negro.
5 posted on
01/25/2011 10:18:24 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: RightGeek
Now all they have to do is drag their feet until the election and Oooops! he was still on the ballot and got elected and they wouldn’t want to overrule the will of the people, now would they? /sarc
6 posted on
01/25/2011 10:19:21 AM PST by
JewishRighter
( Multiculturalism is killing us.)
To: RightGeek
GUARANTEED this guy is on the ballot. GUARANTEED he wins the Mayor position, whether or not he wins.
7 posted on
01/25/2011 10:19:41 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(If Illegal Aliens are Undocumented Workers, then Thieves are Undocumented Shoppers.)
To: RightGeek
A First Amendment challenge? Why not the Commerce Clause?
9 posted on
01/25/2011 10:21:32 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
To: RightGeek
This banana republic just to the South just keeps doing all it can to get people and business to “Escape to Wisconsin”
10 posted on
01/25/2011 10:21:32 AM PST by
MNlurker
To: RightGeek
12 posted on
01/25/2011 10:22:24 AM PST by
paulycy
(Liberals suck all the joy out of America. Let's make them stop.)
To: RightGeek
Which is kind of interesting, because if the ballots are printed with his name on them, and he loses all the appeals, then his name will still be on the ballot but he can’t be elected. So I wonder how they will handle that? If they don’t modify the ballots, some, perhaps many, democratic votes might be wasted by voters selecting him even though he can’t be elected.
To: RightGeek
First Amendment question???
It’s the Chicago way. Who is surprised?
18 posted on
01/25/2011 10:26:57 AM PST by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm.)
To: RightGeek
There is no longer any rule of law, apparently.
21 posted on
01/25/2011 10:29:48 AM PST by
MortMan
(I am in no mood to be amused! (Ebenezer Scrooge))
To: RightGeek
It’s very unlikely that SCOTUS would accept the case. They have refused to do so in several similar cases, including the NJ senate race where the Democrats cheated in 2000 and the recent race in Alaska where Murkowski supporters cheated.
I think it all boils down to this: What does the Chicago Mafia want? It seems unlikely that the appellate court would have found against Rahm unless Daley and the Machine approved. And although Obama says he supports Rahm, some have their doubts.
Well, it’s up to the Illinois Supreme Court, IMHO.
22 posted on
01/25/2011 10:30:05 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: RightGeek
24 posted on
01/25/2011 10:30:49 AM PST by
broken_arrow1
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
To: RightGeek
He is “deemed” on the ballot.
What a friggin’ show...
28 posted on
01/25/2011 10:34:05 AM PST by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: RightGeek
What does that mean? Should I contribute to Mosley Braun?
I am really beginning to hate politics.....arrrggggh!!
I dont think I can take tonight, why oh why are they all sitting together?
29 posted on
01/25/2011 10:34:28 AM PST by
Texas4ever
(God is in control!)
To: RightGeek
He’s entitled to running, yaknow.. doesn’t matter what the law says..
Heck, dead folk are gonna write him in overwhelmingly anyway. ;-)
32 posted on
01/25/2011 10:36:45 AM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
To: RightGeek
There is no way that Dead Fish won't be on the ballot, and won't be Chicago's next mayor.
Chicago is totally corrupt.
35 posted on
01/25/2011 10:38:35 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: RightGeek
If he can’t weasel his way back on the ballot, he isn’t corrupt enough to be the Mayor of Chicago.
36 posted on
01/25/2011 10:40:14 AM PST by
Tijeras_Slim
(Jubtabulously We Thrive!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson