Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightGeek

Which is kind of interesting, because if the ballots are printed with his name on them, and he loses all the appeals, then his name will still be on the ballot but he can’t be elected. So I wonder how they will handle that? If they don’t modify the ballots, some, perhaps many, democratic votes might be wasted by voters selecting him even though he can’t be elected.


13 posted on 01/25/2011 10:23:08 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer

This sounds EXACTLY like that Christmas Story where they dump the letters to Santa on the judges desk....


23 posted on 01/25/2011 10:30:47 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer

I dunno, the state elections guy said today they had to go to print based on the Appeals Court decision, so the Supremes stepped in to prevent that. But the elections guy said they’d have to destroy and reprint the ballots if the decision was reversed, so I’d say that will still be the case.


33 posted on 01/25/2011 10:37:27 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer

They’re not going to let a little thing like ineligibility get in their way.


51 posted on 01/25/2011 10:58:57 AM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer

Maybe that will split the Dems enough. There hasn’t been a Republican in that office since 1931. Are there any GOP candidates?


90 posted on 01/25/2011 4:02:00 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson