Posted on 01/23/2011 5:20:33 AM PST by TexasCajun
HAWAII GROUND REPORT: Could Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie not be as incompetent and foolish as he appears, but orchestrating a deliberate birth certificate recovery dead end to cover his own papakole? UPDATED: Mystery solved! Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written Barry Soetoro on it
Heres an interesting Ground Report from Hawaii that contains an ingenious theory about Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombies bizarre backtrack on releasing Obamas birth certificate.
Remember, Abercrombie promised that once he was elected Governor he would prove Obamas birth certificate existed because he would march down to the Hall of Records and demand its production from the archives
and he would then hold it aloft in the gentle Hawaiian breeze, high above his balding pate, for all the world to see, thereby producing the document Obama has spent millions to keep hidden.
(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...
You said it better and more concisely than I was going to say it. Well done.
It is common, in many states, to reach back onto the birth certificates, to change a name on a birth certificate. From the birth name to the adopted name, and behave as the original name never existed.
I’m no fan of this, mind you, but this is done in a lot of the states and has been for many years.
So yes, a birth certificate from the sixties would reflect an adoption (thus a name change) into the seventies.
Go ahead and look it up. It’s no joke.
“So a birth certificate from the sixties would reflect a name change from the seventies.”
Yes, actually that is what happens. When there is an adoption, the original is sealed and the birth certificate is reissued as a birth registration with the new parent(s) listed... at least that’s what happened in Michigan to me back in the late 50’s when my mother remarried after my father’s death and my stepfather adopted us... don’t know about Hawaii.
There is a reason why his origins are obscure/mysterious.
I think this is it (the correct theory)...in many respects no big deal....the kid was adopted by a foreigner ...but politically and technically its a mess
Yep.
I'd also like to know if there were ever any pre-2007 postings anywhere online mentioning anything about "original" birth certificates of adoptees.
The original BC could be under ‘Dunham,’ and only if reckless Ann Dunham declared the Indonesian adoption to HI officials did the HI BC get changed.
His biological mother retained custody throughout.
Birth certificates are sealed only in closed adoptions.
Thank you.
That's interesting. But, that doesn't tell me whether the original certificate exists in the filing system, or if there is a link or reference to it in the filing system. It's hard to believe that the original records, or any link to them, would simply be destroyed.
Freeper Aunt Polgara’s original BC was sealed when her mom married and her husband adopted her children.
So is the orginal sealed to where even you as the individual whose name was changed can’t see it?
In any case regarding Obama he’s refused to release any BC original or revised to reflect an adoption. I think that is the greater point of this matter.
They are SEALED.
They can't be accessed, except by a court order, and then the (physical) seals are broken.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Interesting that Hawaii has a convenient little law barring BCs to be made public, if that person doesn’t give said permission. When did they enact this law and why?
I think an entire country has a “right” to see the BC, whether Barry gives his permission or not!
A legally sealed document can ONLY be unsealed by court order.
So, would the short form with the new name that he did submit for public view be a total fraud in the case where the original has not been amended with new latest/greatest legal name?
Correct! We adopted two boys, one in Texas and one in Florida. In both cases, we were given a new birth certificate with my wife and I as the parents. The originals are still on file. The information can only be retreived by court order, for just cause.
BTW, since he has not LEGALLY changed his name and he signs everything 0bambi, anything he signs is a fraudulent document and is therefore, null and void.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.