“So a birth certificate from the sixties would reflect a name change from the seventies.”
Yes, actually that is what happens. When there is an adoption, the original is sealed and the birth certificate is reissued as a birth registration with the new parent(s) listed... at least that’s what happened in Michigan to me back in the late 50’s when my mother remarried after my father’s death and my stepfather adopted us... don’t know about Hawaii.
Freeper Aunt Polgara’s original BC was sealed when her mom married and her husband adopted her children.
So is the orginal sealed to where even you as the individual whose name was changed can’t see it?
In any case regarding Obama he’s refused to release any BC original or revised to reflect an adoption. I think that is the greater point of this matter.
And this goes back to a question of logical concern...
If the certificate of record reflects an adoptive situation, then under Indonesian law, Soetero is an Indonesian citizen. Ind. does not recognize dual citizenship and a child would have no legal standing especially from that era.
As much as folks want to dismiss this potential fact, Soetero may actually be an illegal alien if he never claimed his American citizenship back at his adult age.
This could have been done if he registered for the draft.
He would not need to register for the draft if he was an Indonesian citizen. As a foreign college student ...again the college would not require he be registered, nor question it.
This all now becomes a question of “true loyalty of oath.”