Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Overturns Ban of Gays Serving Openly, Sends Bill to Obama's Desk
Fox News ^ | Dec. 18, 2010

Posted on 12/18/2010 12:48:49 PM PST by Jess Kitting

Edited on 12/18/2010 1:10:23 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON -- In a landmark vote, the Senate on Saturday ended the Clinton-era ban on gays serving openly in the military, marking a major triumph for President Obama, liberals and the gay community.

The final vote to end the Pentagon's 1993 "don't ask, don't tell" policy was 65-31, drawing support from eight Republicans.

The bill now goes to the White House for Obama's signature. He is expected to sign the bill into law next week, a senior White House aide told Fox News.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commies; dadt; dontaskdonttell; georgevoinovich; homosexualagenda; johnensign; lisamurkowski; markkirk; mentaldisorder; olympiasnowe; pushbacksabitch; richardburr; scottbrown; sexpervertsrejoice; susancollins; youandwhatfagarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-455 next last
To: goldstategop
Its silly to have to have people hide who they are.

I agree, positive ID should be obtained for all members of the military. But getting back tot he point of THIS discussion, it's also silly to have mentally ill people who CHOOSE to engage in sexual perversion serve in the military and announce it to their colleagues.

121 posted on 12/18/2010 1:34:49 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
DADT repeal is horrible and a way to undo it needs to be found, but you really want a military coup in America? Really? Is that your solution?

Might be a good idea.

122 posted on 12/18/2010 1:35:07 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Knowing the democrats, I fear they will try to make being gay mandatory in the military.


123 posted on 12/18/2010 1:35:45 PM PST by engrpat (A village in Kenya is missing their idiot...lets send him back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indthkr

Joe Manchin


124 posted on 12/18/2010 1:35:47 PM PST by jessduntno (Care what the Left thinks of you? "Their opinion of me and my policies is irrelevant." - Dick Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All

Sick sick sick

125 posted on 12/18/2010 1:36:43 PM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be ustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey; Jim Robinson
Our fighting men (and women) can handle this.

Zot?

126 posted on 12/18/2010 1:37:48 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Voting on this bill in the Congress, yea or nay, should have been restricted to those who have actually worn the uniform.

Forget what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs says. He’ll never again in his life be in the situation of shared living with other troops. And, in Mullen’s case, I think he’s something of a political whore who will do/say whatever Obama wants rather than the rank and file. I may dislike him even more than I do Obama.


127 posted on 12/18/2010 1:37:52 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1

Yep RD...thing is...why fix something not broken? When I was a junior officer in the navy I was the disbursing officer on a very large ship (USS SAIPAN-LHA-2). I had a division of 8 guys. Me - three African Americans, a Portuguese fella, a Bostonite, a Mexican kid, a homo, and a filipino 1st Class. We didn’t have any problems at all.

Everybody was good at math...the homo kid was a wizard. Nobody cared cause he kept it to himself. I knew he was queer because the shoes he wore out on liberty were more expensive than my whole uniform. Still...I would have backed the kid up at Captains Mast any day because he was good at his job and didn’t flirt with the other guys.


128 posted on 12/18/2010 1:37:57 PM PST by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ
As of now we no longer have a military fighting force with a mission to defend the U.S. Instead, we have a giant social experiment. I don’t believe for a second that any of these yes-voting senators really have a clue about what they have just done.

The military should be comprised of the best and brightest since lives are always at risk. By definition, homosexuals are deviants. Period.

Their abominable, disgusting deathstyle choice (and a choice is precisely the apt term) shows that they are utterly incapable of proper decision-making.

May God Almighty help our country and our soldiers in the wake of this most grievous sin.

129 posted on 12/18/2010 1:38:43 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TCH

Burr, Ensign, Voinovich, Kirk, Murkowski, Scott Brown, Snowe and Collins.


130 posted on 12/18/2010 1:39:34 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Jim Robinson
I don’t have a problem with it. Its silly to have to have people hide who they are. I’ve always thought there was a case to be made for banning homosexuality in the armed service but DADT is offensive and hypocritical. Its like saying a woman can be pregnant but she needs to hide it so people won’t have to face it. This is one fight that is now history.

IMO this deserves the ZOT.

131 posted on 12/18/2010 1:40:10 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: sport

The Tea Party did back Brown. My bad on Kirk.

“The group Tea Party Express circulated a Rasmussen poll early Wednesday morning showing that 40 percent of Massachusetts voters now approve of the movement (to 41 percent who disapprove), and talking about the party’s contribution to Brown’s win”.


132 posted on 12/18/2010 1:40:42 PM PST by imfrmdixie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ

I wonder what ahmadinejads of the world are thinking to themselves today?

I wonder what they’re discussing in their national security bunkers???

They must be laughing their heads off!


133 posted on 12/18/2010 1:40:42 PM PST by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sport
I cannot even pray to God to save this once great country anymore, when our elected leader believe it is more important to legitimize perversion within the halls of Government than it is to pass the 12 budget bills as mandated by our Constitution. Let it sink. Almost 50% of the nation pays NO Federal Income tax now.

About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:
"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."
134 posted on 12/18/2010 1:40:48 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2644629/posts?page=16#198

There is a problem with homosexuals in the military as we should be taking sick mental folk as Manning has proved.


135 posted on 12/18/2010 1:40:51 PM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting
I wonder how thoroughly anyone in congress has thought this through -

1. A straight service member has an openly gay service member assigned as his roommate. The straight service member now must accept this. If he expresses the fact that this makes him uncomfortable what then? Will he be told tough, deal with it? Does he risk punishment of some kind from his commanding officers?

2. A gay service member from Massachusetts wants on base housing for he and his same gender spouse. Will the military have to accommodate him? If you are a normal straight couple with children will you now be forced to live next door to this couple if you reside in on base housing? You must now accept this lifestyle as normal or else?

3. Will gays now demand their own gay only NCO club on base? How about a bathhouse?

4. Will the military be forced to accept blood donations from homosexuals even though there is a long incubation period with the HIV virus?

136 posted on 12/18/2010 1:41:37 PM PST by saneright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parisa

>> I wonder what ahmadinejads of the world are thinking to themselves today?

How to enlist.


137 posted on 12/18/2010 1:41:47 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: All; newzjunkey; Jim Robinson

“There are already more than 35 nations with open service by homosexuals in their militaries including our nearest allies like the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Israelis. Our fighting men (and women) can handle this.”

Screw off, reprobate!

Our military should NOT have to “handle” this.

Jim, ZOT this freaking moron.


138 posted on 12/18/2010 1:42:11 PM PST by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Everyone get on their phones and call the White House ASAP. Don’t wait! Do it now!!! /sarc. Nobody hold their breath please! We don’t need any deceased FREEPERS.


139 posted on 12/18/2010 1:42:19 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234; KansasGirl; manc

Thanks for the additional input. It may be just a formality, but maybe not. The DoD knows more than it’s telling about how devastating this would be for our troops. I wonder just how eager they are to initiate the destruction this change would wreak. I don’t claim any insider knowledge, but I do think there are reasons for the DoD to apply the brakes on implementation. This would be a terrible time for enlistment and re-ups to plummet, for morale to take a nosedive, and for general disruption and degradation in the ranks.


140 posted on 12/18/2010 1:43:07 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson