To: goldstategop; Jim Robinson
I dont have a problem with it. Its silly to have to have people hide who they are. Ive always thought there was a case to be made for banning homosexuality in the armed service but DADT is offensive and hypocritical. Its like saying a woman can be pregnant but she needs to hide it so people wont have to face it. This is one fight that is now history.IMO this deserves the ZOT.
131 posted on
12/18/2010 1:40:10 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va; jimrob
IMO this deserves the ZOT. I agree 100% with you on the need to dis-invite this guest. We're all Jim's guests here and should behave accordingly. It's been made clear that FR is pro-God, pro-life, pro-Gun and opposed to homosexuality in ALL forms. My opinion is that any FR participant (regardless of membership tenure here) who advocates homosexuality in any way disrupts the Conservative nature of this fine forum.
We can certainly have divergent (and often passionate) viewpoints on how best to advocate Constitutional Conservatism. But there are some fundamental, immutable positions upon which we must all form a consensus. All IMHO, of course.
161 posted on
12/18/2010 1:50:25 PM PST by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
To: central_va
I dont have a problem with it. Its silly to have to have people hide who they are. Ive always thought there was a case to be made for banning homosexuality in the armed service but DADT is offensive and hypocritical. Its like saying a woman can be pregnant but she needs to hide it so people wont have to face it. This is one fight that is now history.
IMO this deserves the ZOT.
Muffin is charging up her capacitors....
Muffin: b. 8-21-1987 - d. 7-09-2004
317 posted on
12/18/2010 4:28:17 PM PST by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson