If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[andy58-in-nh]

BTW, when will you tell us how homosexuality is "born that way" and "genetic"

Yes. I am guilty of contradicting myself, without intending to, but I still did it. I offered two views that are incompatible. One indicates that homosexuals are born the way they are, and the other that it is the result of some sort of developmental influence. That was very inexact and contradictory language on my part, and I regret having confused the matter.

I do not know for certain why they are the way they are, and I don't think the issue has been resolved scientifically. I doubt it is genetic, but there does seem to be some kind of early developmental disposition that can be triggered - or not - later on by societal influences. That's the best I can offer on causes. I am not an expert.

The point I tried to make - poorly, as it transpires, is that once someone does self-identify "that way", their sexual identity is no longer voluntary or mutable, although their behavior most certainly is. No need to get graphic about it, but there are some practices that are shunned by the ones who have "wised up" and realize that some parts of the body weren't meant to be used in certain ways. AIDS ought to have made that clear enough, but compulsion plus cultural "approval" = bad behavior.

The latter is a political issue and one where Hollywood's twisted visions have resulted in great damage. I think we can agree that needs to be opposed and countered with better ideas and healthier role models.

[Neoliberalnot]

Hear, Hear.

[Neoliberalnot]

We are currently seeing/watching the sodomization of the country and the latest victim is our once proud military.

[DJ MacWoW]

At Christmas time “Don we now our gay apparel” now means something else. Homosexuals have even polluted our language.

[andy58-in-nh]

No actually, I am not a hypocrite. I distinguish between public and private behavior, and between political and personal matters. It is none of my business what consenting adults do behind closed doors. It is entirely my business what an aggressive public lobby demands that I approve of, and worse, does it with my tax money.

[central_va]

We are currently seeing/watching the sodomization of the country and the latest victim is our once proud military.

The left/sodomites have crossed the political Rubicon with this one.

[trisham]

Even now, the correct term, “homosexual” is rarely used and is clearly frowned upon by the majority of our society. People do not want to be reminded of what “gay” people actually are and do.

[j.argese]

You’re a troll.

[DJ MacWoW]

Aren’t you tired of the excuse that “I use “gay” because it’s easier to type”? *eyes rolling*

[Neoliberalnot]

I pray you are right. The sodomites continue to gain ground and ultimately, those that object (aka the normal) will be criminalized. Normal humans have a natural aversion to deviant sexual behavior, and make no mistake, the lawyers that will represent the sodomites know this and intend to capitalize and lawsuits that are sure to come.

[Cronos]

Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else.

Well put. What I don't get is this is not like Victorian times or India where if you perform a perverted act you can get arrested and tossed in prison (though my own personal belief is that that is a law that should be brought back), gays are free to do whatever they want as individuals.

Why do they want to get "married"? Why do they want to have their horrible "gy parades" and wag their perversion in my face?

If they want to be perverts in their own back yard, go ahead, but keep it private.

Sorry, but this entire DADT repeal has really ticket me off --> what was the problem with leaving things as they were? A gay could enter the army as long as they shut their mouth (in more ways than one) -- and no issue. Why repeal it?

Ohbummer will see that he destroys the USA by 2012 -- that ****** knows he won't get re-elected so he's going to destroy as much as he can before he get's booted out. He's already destroyed our relationship with the UK and Australia and come close to undoing all of Bush's hard work with India.

Thanks Jim for sponsoring a forum where the message can go out -- in 2012, let there be record numbers against the Dems

[trisham]

I’ve heard that or its variation (easier to say) so many times. Please.

[trisham]

Amen!

[DJ MacWoW]

You’re a troll.

Hardly. But you are a nut. And Jim watches his threads. Do you really want to make this your hill to die on because you don't approve of another posters attitude?

[Cronos]

I’ve not heard a even moderatly response from Dimonuts about why they wanted this repealed. The adverse reaction to this may mean that the next congress can push a “No gys allowed in the military” law. Dumb pinkos, they’ve pushed people too far.

[trisham]

You’re a troll.

**************************

LOL! What irony!

[DJ MacWoW]

Yep. So many have bought the propaganda and the “special language”.

[RU88]

Right on Jim!

[Cronos]

Good point — they want things to change FOR them, disregarding us.