Replies

I’ve not heard a even moderatly response from Dimonuts about why they wanted this repealed. The adverse reaction to this may mean that the next congress can push a “No gys allowed in the military” law. Dumb pinkos, they’ve pushed people too far.

It is/ was and will be used to legimateize two men "marrying" each other, two women "marrying" each other , one man "marrying" an animal, one woman "marrying" an animal. But get used to it because just as sure as Monday follows Sunday, the same arguments are going to be used by those who wish to legalize and legitamize their agenda such as men having sex with children, women having sex with children, men having sex with animals, women having sex with animals.

And they will have their apologists on this forum defending them. Their cry will be, "I know this person, they are nice and professional, I certainly donot approve of what they do with their dog, cat, cow,horse, ect. But, hey, what they do in their bedroom is their business." Or "I work with this individual that has a two year old as their partner,now, be it far from me to agree with their relationship, but, who am I to throw rocks."

And this is just the beginning.

I have asked and asked about what pro’s this brings to pour military and not one person can name 3 pro’s and how it will improve us.

I’ve listed them dozens of cons and all they can say it is a civil rights issue, well seeing as we now give equal rights to people based on their sexual lives then we should give civil right and equal rights to those who have 9 women as wives, consenting incest, sex with animals.
Can’t have discrimination can we but of course when that point is mentioned they say it is stupid and then can’t even say why it is stupid.

It’s like dealing with little kids wanting their own way all the time.and they wonder why they are looked as at as mentally unstable along with their supporters