Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Missouri state treasurer Sarah Steelman to run against Sen. Clair McCaskill in 2012
KMOX | December 1, 2010

Posted on 12/01/2010 7:35:07 AM PST by Second Amendment First

Just heard on the Charlie Brennan show that Steelman will run.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: chat; missinglink; missouri; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2010 7:35:09 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Claire will not even win the nomination.

Lots of people will cross over in the primary for the express purpose of thwarting her.

2 posted on 12/01/2010 7:37:18 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
What does Sarah Steelman think about the Tea Party movement?
3 posted on 12/01/2010 7:38:18 AM PST by 2001convSVT (That Beck guy was right about gold, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

http://www.sarahsteelman.com/

‘12 website.


4 posted on 12/01/2010 7:38:54 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Is it proper etiquette to tip after a enhanced pat down?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Which Democrat will oppose Sen. McCaskill?


5 posted on 12/01/2010 7:41:39 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Former Missouri state treasurer Sarah Steelman to run against Sen. Clair McCaskill in 2012

First she will need to run against the other Republicans in the primary. There is no guarantee she would win that. There could be several good candidates in the Republican primary.

6 posted on 12/01/2010 7:42:09 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (St. Louis, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

Steelman is a tea party favorite. Jim Talent may also run; he lost to McCaskill last time.
I was going to post more info but Firefox is giving me problems.


7 posted on 12/01/2010 7:47:05 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins
Which Democrat will oppose Sen. McCaskill?

Who cares?

8 posted on 12/01/2010 7:47:18 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I’d vote for Kevin the lost bunny of the apocalpse before McCaskill.


9 posted on 12/01/2010 7:51:16 AM PST by Leg Olam (A pipe gives a wise man time to think and a fool something to stick in his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Thanks, if Sarah Steelman gets traction this early in the race we may be able to take back our country in 2012
10 posted on 12/01/2010 7:56:29 AM PST by 2001convSVT (That Beck guy was right about gold, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
"Jim Talent may also run; he lost to McCaskill"

Yes, he did lose, but it was in the great purge of Republicans in 2006. Also she only beat him by the skin of her teeth (50-47%).

I am undecided who I will support at this time. I like Steelman, but fear she is a poor campaigner. I've heard her speak and it was not pretty. Hopefully she has improved.

11 posted on 12/01/2010 7:57:30 AM PST by buschbaby (~Irritated ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First; All
I was going to post more info but. . . .

Here is a story I just posted, which has more info:

Steelman makes it official: Running for Senate in '12 (Missouri)

12 posted on 12/01/2010 8:03:13 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (St. Louis, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Great news that likeable Claire has an opponent! Claire has had more faces than the carnival mirror walk, and a head that swivels on issues. She single handedly threw a large wave of votes to Obama, over Hillary, ingratiating herself with the One, and now it’s pay up time. She can’t back track fast enough, hopelessly moving back to the Right.


13 posted on 12/01/2010 8:09:51 AM PST by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buschbaby
I like Steelman, but fear she is a poor campaigner. I've heard her speak and it was not pretty.

Sounds like Sharron Angle II. Well-spokenness is important.

14 posted on 12/01/2010 8:23:36 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Reminds me of the actress Nicollette Sheridan.

15 posted on 12/01/2010 8:27:45 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

I would urge caution with Steelman.

In my mind as a Missourian and political observer I would note that she seems to be a political opportunist. How do I define that? She will use what ever argument fits her at the time to win. Just ask former congressman Kenny Hulshoff.

Do not be misled into believing motives.

Unlike many tea party/grass roots activist, she is more of an establishment figure than what you may believe - including working being endorsed by at lease one state union. Her husband was selected for a job for current Democrat governor Jay Nixon. Did I mention she coddled extreme left wing journalist David Catanese?

Let me be up front on why I have no problem breaking Reagan’s 11th commandment when speaking about Steelman. She had no problem doing so with Hulshoff or anyone else, regardless if they deserved it or not.

Is Steelman an upgrade over McCaskill? By far.

I would have trouble voting for her, however. Because its always about her and her self.


16 posted on 12/01/2010 8:33:52 AM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT
Thanks, if Sarah Steelman gets traction this early in the race we may be able to take back our country in 2012

We need to be realistic about who we are electing even when it is a supposed "Tea Party" person.

These people all get the same pool of campaign managers, transition experts, staffers and future fund raisers as the old guard does and that pool of people are all tied to lobbyists for area interests.

I have seen this for a fact as within days of the election the "new guys" have had the old interest funnels appear with their offers of connections.

We are electing LEGISLATORS, a scummy breed in general, even those promising change need to constantly be worried about thier local support.

17 posted on 12/01/2010 8:42:28 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Here is something else to ponder. At the MO Republican Convention of 2008 Steelman caused some minor chaos by supporting and attending a Ron Paul rally. The Ron Paul delegates were attempting to get Paul the nomination for MO and she co-oped them to get more votes. Anyway, Steelman created enemies within the State Party, they won’t forget that and I wonder how much damage was done. While this is not insurmountable, it will take a strong base of Tea Party support (which I have yet to see in action in MO). It will certainly be an interesting election.


18 posted on 12/01/2010 8:45:12 AM PST by buschbaby (~Irritated ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE
"she seems to be a political opportunist"

I've seen this first hand. See my previous comment about convention.

19 posted on 12/01/2010 8:49:17 AM PST by buschbaby (~Irritated ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

She’s been joined at the hip with obama from day one.


20 posted on 12/01/2010 9:15:33 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson