Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
BuckT is NOT a true conservative. It was BuckT that came after us telling us we were morons because we questioned the cert # of “Zero’s” COLB as it was filed days before the Nordyke twins, but it has a higher number. BuckT wanted us all to believe that those numbers were pre-printed on the forms, lol.
BuckT is a BOT...ZOT the BOT! It’s playing nicey nice for a reason & it is liberal BOT doctrine to infiltrate & destroy from within.
He did another Opus a little while back.
(shrug) He will come back some day I think LOL
He did?
He was hilarious.
Wonder why?
Oh well, Hotel California. You can never leave and he is probably taking a nap.
He’ll be back.
Honestly, if I can make a suggestion? Don’t post it. It has caused me grief and I regret having done it. But its done and can’t be undone.
Thats just my 2 cents worth.
Of course, that might just be the very reason all that crap happened to me, so that no one else would DARE do it. Hell if I know. All I know is that it has not been a pleasant experience in general.
It was sorta lame as far as Opusi go...
#
Obama is not a Native US Citizen
Monday, May 17, 2010 7:17:40 AM · 517 of 752
parsifal to BP2
You aren’t a conservative. You’re a twit who can’t read one single case and get it right. Heck, you can’t get ONE SENTENCE right!
Talk about a bunch of Rocket Scientists!!!
I tell you what. I’ll save Jim the trouble of zotting me. I had hoped to make a dozen years, but what the heck. As long as you idiotic Birfers are loose to make this place look like some kind of Art Bell Halfway House, I don’t want my name, uh er uh, screen name, associated with it.
Jim should have spanked Birfer Butt a long time ago and made you idiots behave. You have been terrorizing the threads too long and calling anybody who disagrees with you trolls and whatever. Should have been stopped a long time ago.
So, I tell you what. Jim Rob made you, and Jim Rob can have you. He can give you a bottle at 3:00 am when you wake up crying with a poopy diaper!
Until then, I ZOTTTTT! myself. The door ain’t hitting me in the ass on the way out. . .
parsy, who . . . . .bows, and takes his leave. (Applause)
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies
It’s obvious CON that Jamese7777 is a troll. He brazenly admitted that he was a paid troll here on two different occasions. They were not humorous posts that he and others tried to explain it. Those two posts were terse one or two word answers - no humor in that.
If you’re going to tell my paid Obot story, I’d appreciate it if you’d tell the COMPLETE story.
I’m also proud to say that I am a prescient troll in that I began trolling on FreeRepublic two years before Barry Obama announced his candidacy for the presidency.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
That’s Parsy. LOL
He and a few other posters hate the “birther thing”, which I hope will rear it’s beautiful head, should we win enough majorities.
Most people don’t get that “Juan the Lame” would be fighting about his NBC had he been elected.
Fortunately, he wasn’t elected and I much prefer the country go down hill, faster and screaming.
America Deserves Barry Fauxbama.
Kinda like you gotta get sick to get better. Juan was going to be like a slow moving cancer.
With Barry the country simply puts a bottle to their head and pulls the trigger. After a few short years people will get tired of the hangover, go to a halfway house and find themselves. Some of the will find themselves again.
Still, Parsy cracked me up and even though he hated birthers, he tolerated me.
I enjoyed his wit and repartee’.
Too bad
“The working terms here are ACTUAL OBEDIENCE, not temporary allegiance. And you haven’t actually documented what you claim, no surprise.”
I have, but you don’t pay attention so documenting doesn’t matter.
“When private individuals of one nation spread themselves through another as business or caprice may direct, mingling indiscriminately with the inhabitants of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for the purposes of trade, it would be obviously inconvenient and dangerous to society, and would subject the laws to continual infraction and the government to degradation, if such individuals or merchants did not owe temporary and local allegiance and were not amenable to the jurisdiction of the country. Nor can the foreign sovereign have any motive for wishing such exemption. His subjects thus passing into foreign countries are not employed by him, nor are they engaged in national pursuits. Consequently there are powerful motives for not exempting persons of this description from the jurisdiction of the country in which they are found, and no one motive for requiring it. The implied license, therefore, under which they enter can never be construed to grant such exemption.”
The Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. 7 Cranch 116 116 (1812)
http://supreme.justia.com/us/11/116/case.html
“If he was born before 4 July, 1776, it is as clear that he was born a British subject. If he was born after 4 July, 1776, and before 15 September, 1776, he was born an American citizen, whether his parents were at the time of his birth British subjects or American citizens. Nothing is better settled at the common law than the doctrine that the children even of aliens born in a country while the parents are resident there under the protection of the government and owing a temporary allegiance thereto are subjects by birth.”
Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 1830
http://supreme.justia.com/us/28/99/case.html
“In short, the judgment in the case of The Exchange declared, as incontrovertible principles, that the jurisdiction of every nation within its own territory is exclusive and absolute, and is susceptible of no limitation not imposed by the nation itself; that all exceptions to its full and absolute territorial jurisdiction must be traced up to its own consent, express or implied; that, upon its consent to cede, or to waive the exercise of, a part of its territorial jurisdiction rest the exemptions from that jurisdiction of foreign sovereigns or their armies entering its territory with its permission, and of their foreign ministers and public ships of war, and that the implied license under which private individuals of another nation enter the territory and mingle indiscriminately with its inhabitants for purposes of business or pleasure can never be construed to grant to them an exemption from the jurisdiction of the country in which they are found.”
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html
Now you’re just makin’ up stuff.
I didn’t ask you to believe any particular scenario. I offered only alternative scenarios for consideration based on my experience as a title clerk in college. And I didn’t call anyone a moron for questioning certification numbers.
I’m a liberal Bot! Right! /s
Well at least things are back to normal around here.
Actually, the words that matter are: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Zot the Obama After-Birthers masquerading as CONservatives to Googleplex and to Infinity and Beyond!!!
NO,
The COLBs are for my husband’s family and out of respect for their privacy I cannot reveal them. I realize that sounds like a cop-out but it’s true. I do have a scan of the bottom left corners showing the “DATE FILED BY REGISTAR” that I emailed to someone a while back.
Just shows how intrinsically sneaky & suspicious YOU ARE!
You're someone who can't get it right. You being here for a couple of years before doesn't mean squat.
Just asking. I have an extensive collection of the BC’s and COLB’s for future reference.
Thanks and I understand.
If I remember correctly..JimRob posted the Obama eligilibity threads would have a free reign. Meaning let the battle begin.
It is posted somewhere.
They’ll never see it coming.
Good idea!
A Summary View of the Rights of British America
Thomas Jefferson
1774
To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies, under such laws and regulations as to them shall seem most likely to promote public happiness. That their Saxon ancestors had, under this universal law, in like manner left their native wilds and woods in the north of Europe, had possessed themselves of the island of Britain, then less charged with inhabitants, and had established that there system of laws which has so long been the glory and protection of that country. Nor was ever any claim of superiority or dependence asserted over them by that mother country from which they had migrated; and were such a claim made, it is believed that his majesty's subjects in Great Britain have too firm a feeling of rights derived to them from their ancestors, to bow down the sovereignty of their state before such visionary pretensions. And it is thought that no circumstance has occurred to distinguish materially the British from the Saxon emigration. America was conquered, and her settlements made, and firmly established, at the expense of individuals, and not of the British public. Their own blood was spilt in acquiring lands for their settlement, their own fortunes expended in making that settlement effectual; for themselves they fought, for themselves they conquered, and for themselves alone they have right to hold....
That we shall at this time also take notice of an error in the nature of our land holdings, which crept in at a very early period of our settlement. The introduction of the feudal tenures into the kingdom of England, though ancient, is well enough understood to set this matter in a proper light....
The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them....
http://www.ashbrook.org/library/18/jefferson/summaryview.html
Buckeye is certainly very “liberal” and generous with slamming Miss Tickly to the floor; where are his criticisms for the 0thugga toadying suckup liars?
Hmmm?
crickets.
Stinks.
Sorry, but unless one is born to parents who are citizens, this fails to make anyone a natural born citizen. Also, being 'subject to the jurisdiction' has never been shown to apply to anyone who does not have a permanent domicil and is not a permanent resident, such as Barak Sr. So, you're right. Obama may not even be a 14th amendment citizen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.