Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
Good question.
Equal protection under the law and all that Constitutional stuff that nobody has been following since the Obama coup (and before).
Tried to size it but it didn’t work....am curious to see what the consensus is.
“What is actually on the back of the BC copy would be necessary to confirm the accuracy of the statement.”
Not really, I want to see the inside of that envelope, too. Disassembled if necessary. If there is ink on the back of the photocopy, there is ink on the inside of that envelope!
And one would think some kind of smudging on the receipt. Ink doesn’t just transfer up and away—it smudges.
Would it matter whether the ink was from a photocopier (toner) or whether it was from a printer (ink cartridge)?
I’m not very knowledgeable about all this stuff.
Toner will smudge worse because it’s powdery...
If it transferred to the photocopy, it surely left a mess inside that envelope for several days. I want to see the insid eo f the envelope and the back of both documents and the back of her ‘Certification of Live Birth’ in a beautiful still life.
This time, let’s see the embossed seal and date stamp with a little camera focus.=)
Please and thanks! (And like TODAY, not tomorrow)
I’m not an expert on this in any way, but I don’t think anybody could know for certain that it was genuine without seeing the paper document itself. Anomalies could be found to show it was forged, but there would be no way to prove that it was genuine. That’s why 3-dimensional seals are used, and why internet images can’t be used as legal proof.
I’m not sure if it’s a trick question or not, but that would be my answer - non-expert that I am.
You’re so full of horsesh*t. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Just because there is toner transfer on the back of the long-form doesn’t mean there has to also be toner transfer to the envelope or smudging on the receipt.
As I’ve said, numerous times now, it only takes a second for the toner to dry.
Horsesh*t. Not if the transfer occurred outside of the envelope or if the documents were inserted into the envelope when they were dry.
Danae has already made it clear that there was no embossed seal or datestamp because it wasn't a certified copy.
Have used many date stamps..the numbers and letters move constantly..had different brands in my desk.. Sometimes no ink to refill the pad would borrow a date stamp from another desk..the stamps were different.
Can remember opening my desk drawer looking for a date stamp..its not there..someone borrowed it.
If it only takes a second for the toner to dry, then how would you get a transfer at all?
I really don’t understand how these things happen.
If you remain skeptical, that's fine.
The documents are in Danae’s possession. I have no control over them and will make no attempt to do so.
If Danae were to ask for my advice, it would be not to bother with any additional efforts in attempt to convince you.
Danae has demonstrated that long forms are still available.
If you do not accept this, that's not my concern.
I thought of that too. It would seem odd for all the others to match fonts like that. Could be coincidence I suppose; a bigger sampling would give more confidence.
If you can meet me at the grocery store this afternoon with the document we can discuss it over some apple cider.
If the documents were printed one right after the other and ejected from the printer one on top of the other into the tray, it could have transferred at that point, but it would have dried very quickly.
Humidity and pressure can also cause transfer. There are a lot of variables/scenarios.
So, you are still Obama’s rump ranger. Figures
Place a drivers license or an id in a wallet..next to another id..see what happens..the ink is dry. Sometimes there is a transfer to the wallet or a folded paper.
Why, you can’t tell from that image?
When judges and justices read Dr. Fukino’s statement, they dismiss the lawsuit.
What a bunch of horse manure! Now you know judges read and believe the same crap you do? First off give them some credit and second its not in evidence and can’t be considered. You really try and spin nothing into something...Have you made your donation yet?
LOL, I see you're in usual form, we still FRiends?
There’s also video footage of somebody at the HDOH office getting a long-form, so we know it can be done.
The bigger picture here, though, is the trust. And I do think that’s worth addressing. If Obama had considered trust of any value then we wouldn’t be where we’re at right now.
I want to believe the best I can about everybody I deal with. I don’t want to believe bad about anybody. When discrepancies come up it means a lot to me to have them cleared up. Danae has been very forthcoming with documents in the past and I hope she will do the same now. I know it gets tiring, but that’s kind of where we’re at now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.