Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

“What is actually on the back of the BC copy would be necessary to confirm the accuracy of the statement.”

Not really, I want to see the inside of that envelope, too. Disassembled if necessary. If there is ink on the back of the photocopy, there is ink on the inside of that envelope!

And one would think some kind of smudging on the receipt. Ink doesn’t just transfer up and away—it smudges.


1,923 posted on 10/24/2010 4:15:02 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1897 | View Replies ]


To: MissTickly

Would it matter whether the ink was from a photocopier (toner) or whether it was from a printer (ink cartridge)?

I’m not very knowledgeable about all this stuff.


1,924 posted on 10/24/2010 4:17:28 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1923 | View Replies ]

To: MissTickly

You’re so full of horsesh*t. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Just because there is toner transfer on the back of the long-form doesn’t mean there has to also be toner transfer to the envelope or smudging on the receipt.

As I’ve said, numerous times now, it only takes a second for the toner to dry.


1,927 posted on 10/24/2010 4:24:16 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1923 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson