Posted on 08/18/2010 1:27:31 PM PDT by rosettasister
The ancient Egyptian toolboxes didnt have precise, sophisticated measuring instruments like we have today or did they?
Christopher Dunn examines that question in his new book, Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt: Advanced Engineering in the Temples of the Pharaohs.
Dunn has made nine trips to Egypt since 1986, and each time hes amazed at the precision of the columns, tunnels and statues. He brushes aside conventional thinking, and suggests the ancient Egyptians used highly refined tools and mega-machines.
Theres more going on here than meets the eye, he said.
A manufacturing engineer by trade, Dunn works as human resources director at Danville Metal Stamping.
His second book, a 400-page paperback, came out in June, but its already getting five-star reviews on http://www.amazon.com
And, despite its intimidating title, Dunn said its not an engineering textbook. The average reader would be able to follow it.
Judd Peck, president of Danville Metal Stamping, has accompanied Dunn to Egypt three times, and wrote one of the forewords.
Its great, he said of the book.
The traditional explanation of how the pyramids were built, for example by men rolling 60-ton granite on logs doesnt fit the evidence.
There are huge implications that just boggle the mind what they were able to do and how sophisticated they were, he said, referring to the ancient Egyptians.
The idea that the Egyptians had advanced tools disrupts peoples linear view of history, that civilizations get more sophisticated through the years, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at commercial-news.com ...
Very funny!
The Egyptians most advanced tool was the Super Weight Extra Added Tonnage machine. It was used with the Great Roto Under Neath Tunneler. Fantastic stuff all!!
RE: lost me when he starts going into theories about the Pyramids being energy machines.
Yep. When the guy across the table starts on about The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt, and describes a holistic energy device that is harmonically coupled with the Earth, I start calling to the waiter, “Check, please!”.
Problems with this theory
A. You need to get the dirt from somewhere and make it hold in place during construction - where are the 'dirt quarries'?
B. The volume of 'dirt' needed to build a low inclination ramp is many times the volume of the pyramid being built. Logistics problem!
C, After building the pyramid 'core' the outer skin of dressed stone was added top down which would require a ramp on all four sides, a different ramp shape, or a whole new theory.
D. After the Pyramid is completely built, you have to remove and dump the 'dirt.' Where are the dumps?
I know that there is evidence of ramps at some pyramids - probably less than ten - but the question remains for all the others. Back to you.
Like you'd get from a mold. There was a book by someone named Davidovits I think, theorizing that the Egyptians used a kind of concrete or some aggregate they poured into molds.
2560 BC. Over the course of 4000 years, I’m not terribly surprised that all but the most scant evidence is long gone.
Certainly there are still many arguments about how things were done, but a simple and realistic mechanical theory is very hard to disprove.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's see...an engineer whose efforts on
The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt, which describes a holistic energy device that is harmonically coupled with the Earth."
turned his brain to mush -- making him the worthless mental equivalent of the typical HR puke...?
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage3
Builds his own wooden fixtures and moves things -- BIG things!
Watch the little movies on the above webpage.
This guy specializes in using counterweights, paired fulcrums, and the mechanical advantage provided by using paired inclinled planes -- with different slopes.
Of course, seeing him roll a square-section stone block eight feet down his sinusoidal "round road" -- with just a single push of his hand -- is impressive, too...
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Pontiac. Christopher Dunn is (IMHO) a loon. He claims that the ancient Egyptians had modern automated tools such as drills, and powered them using the Great Pyramid. This made it possible for them to build the Great Pyramid, and, uh, whoops! :') Still kinda interesting, so here goes a ping! |
||
· Discover · Bronze Age Forum · Science Daily · Science News · Eurekalert · PhysOrg · · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · · History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword · · Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · · |
This fellow knows how it might well have been done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD-EMOhbJ9U&feature=search
Helen Thomas pre-dates the Pyramids:-)
40 years ago NASA could send men to walk on the moon and bring them back safely. Today NASA couldn't punch their way out of a wet paper bag.
The Tompkins book is all about mensuration and the quest for the standards used in the Egyptian construction. It also questions much of the scholarship that has the pyramids to be merely tombs.
He describes the geodesic capabilities of the ancients that includes several Navels or geodesic monuments, one of which was at the site of the Kaaba in Mecca.
I will have to buy the book to see what is added to the pile,
Tompkins mixws his own work with that of many others who got lost in the Academic shuffle.
Egypt..... not Babylon.
That’s AWESOME!!
Thanks for the link.
He used to have a bunch of larger videos on his site -- then he decided to fund his work by selling DVDs. Now all you get free are the few small vids.
His most impressive mechanism is the use of two "fulcrumits" to "walk" 20,000+ lb stones along. You saw the "walking" principle when he moved the counterweight a few inches along atop the large stone by 'spinnning' it horizontally. He shifts the counterweight from end to end to tip the stone's weight up on alternate fulcrums, then he "spins" the big stone -- moving it forward the distance between the two fulcrums with each "step". It's sorta like 'walking' your hand along on two (separated) fingertips by twisting your wrist back and forth...
He supposedly moved a big pole barn across a field -- by himself -- by using the "walking" principle.
The guy makes a lot of sense -- and his stuff works. If you get his DVD, please let me know if it is worthwhile...
True, but she still is an ancient tool!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.