Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Enlists Bill Clinton's Aid on Economy (Calls Impeached, Disbarred Rapist to Save Presidency)
Reuters ^ | Wednesday, July 14, 2010 | Caren Bohan

Posted on 07/14/2010 10:30:04 AM PDT by kristinn

U.S. President Barack Obama sought on Wednesday to lift sagging confidence in his economic stewardship by enlisting the help of predecessor Bill Clinton, as a leading business group issued a scathing critique of the administration's policies.

Clinton, who presided over the 1990s economic boom, was to join Obama at a White House meeting with business leaders at 2:35 p.m. Eastern time (1835 GMT) to encourage job creation and investment, including in clean energy.

SNIP

Four months before the November congressional elections, Republicans have tried to paint Obama and his Democrats as anti-business.

Obama is increasingly turning to former President Clinton to help win over voters and the business community.

Clinton, seen by many in corporate America as sympathetic, has helped the White House by campaigning for Democratic candidates running in November's elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoeconomy; billclinton; democrats; economy; obama; thirdway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2010 10:30:08 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Much of Clinton’s economic boom was due in no small part to the Republican controlled Congress.


2 posted on 07/14/2010 10:31:41 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes?


3 posted on 07/14/2010 10:31:57 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Clean Energy = Higher taxes to pay for subsidies...wonderful.


4 posted on 07/14/2010 10:33:27 AM PDT by demsux (Obama: THE job destroyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

LOL. Love your parenthetical addition to the headline!


5 posted on 07/14/2010 10:34:00 AM PDT by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

And conversely, let’s overlay the timeline of the party shift in Congress with the financial meltdown and the onset of Great Depression II.


6 posted on 07/14/2010 10:36:35 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

My guess is that Barry is trying to use Bill for whatever scant political cover his name can give him. He has no intention of abandoning his hard-core socialism to triangulate with a Republican Congress.


7 posted on 07/14/2010 10:37:00 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This writer is absolutely delusional when it comes to Clinton.

Yeah, Bill will help Barack. He’ll give him that extra shove at the cliffside to make room for Hillary.


8 posted on 07/14/2010 10:37:48 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
9 posted on 07/14/2010 10:38:46 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
Much of Clinton’s economic boom was due in no small part to the Republican controlled Congress.

Obama should certainly follow that same path to success.

10 posted on 07/14/2010 10:39:15 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Clinton’s advice: “Now, Barry, all you do is lose both houses of Congress and you’ll do just fine.”


11 posted on 07/14/2010 10:40:36 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Personal opinion: This is Obama’s way of trying to keep Hillary in check and anchored in her SOS role. I can’t imagine Hillary will sit-out the 2012 primary season since it is her last opportunity to get the job she feels she is entitled to, and she recognizes a wounded and vulnerable candidate when she sees one.

Hollywood will be thrilled.


12 posted on 07/14/2010 10:41:36 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
Much of Clinton’s economic boom was due in no small part to the Republican controlled Congress.

Exactly! They (the MSM/MOONBATS) always leave out that little tidbit.

13 posted on 07/14/2010 10:42:07 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This is nothing more than an attempt to give Monica a resurgence....


14 posted on 07/14/2010 10:42:11 AM PDT by Born In America ("O.B.A.M.A.: One Big A** Mistake, America....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
Much of Clinton’s economic boom was due in no small part to the Republican controlled Congress.

Clinton benefited greatly by a corrupt stock market and the "dot com" internet bubble. He also saved tons of money by slashing the military budget, while at the same time building up the ChiCom military.

15 posted on 07/14/2010 10:42:49 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Oh for the good old days when even Clinton proclaimed, “The era of big government is over!” Well, at least we got a breif repreive then from what was happening now.

They say the stock market has been going up since Obama predicted the Republicans would take the majority last week.


16 posted on 07/14/2010 10:42:50 AM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Clinton has been called to support many dem candidates. The ones I recall all lost. Has anyone ever developed a won/loss (W/L) record for him??
17 posted on 07/14/2010 10:43:20 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Tax Cuts, Not the Clinton Tax Hike, Produced the 1990s Boom

Published on March 4, 2008 by J.D. Foster, Ph.D.

When pressed about the harmful effects on the economy, proponents of highertaxes often fall back on what can be called the “Clinton defense.” President Bill Clinton pushed a major tax increase through Congress in 1993, and, so the story goes, the economy boomed. How, then, can tax increases be so bad for the economy? The inference is even stronger: that highertaxes actually strengthened the economy.

The Clinton defense is superficially plausible, but it fails under closer scrutiny. Economic growth was solid but hardly spectacular in the years immediately following the 1993 tax increase. The real economic boom occurred in the latter half of the decade, after the 1997 tax cut. Lowtaxes are still a key to a strong economy.

http://tinyurl.com/23nt4t8


18 posted on 07/14/2010 10:43:57 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
"Much of Clinton’s economic boom was due in no small part to the Republican controlled Congress."

And the IT revolution which created a tech wave/bubble that can't be replicated.

19 posted on 07/14/2010 10:44:31 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Clinton’s counsel, which will be to move to the center, will be neither welcome nor followed by Obama, the idealogue.


20 posted on 07/14/2010 10:45:38 AM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson