Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

One needn't be a constitutional law scholar to discern the Founding Fathers' intent in the Second Amendment. The original draft presented to the first session of the first Congress read: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person." (The emphasis is mine.)

Clearly, the framers placed the right to bear arms within the context of organized military service.

Poet=creative use of words

Patrick Walsh

Walsh_Patrick_testcopy.jpg

Patrick Walsh

Author's Bio

A 1989 graduate of St. Bonaventure University with a B.A. in history, I served four years as an infantry officer in the 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii.

I received a Master's in Anglo-Irish literature from the University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland in 1997.

A lifelong runner, I've completed over a dozen marathons, including eight consecutive Boston Marathons. My best effort to date was a 290th place finish (out of 18,000) at Boston in 2004.

I live, write, and run in Princeton, New Jersey.

Publications and Prizes

Journals:
Barrow Street, Christian Science Monitor, Chronogram, Cimarron Review, College Green, Hudson Review, Poetry New Zealand, Press, Quadrant, Spitball, The Malahat Review, The Recorder, THE SHOp, U.S. 1

Personal Favorites

What I'm Reading Now:
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, Travels with Charley in Search of America by John Steinbeck, Les Fleurs du Mal by Charles Baudelaire

Favorite Books:
At Swim-Two-Birds; Down and Out in Paris and London; Dubliners; Good-Bye to All That; The Grapes of Wrath; In Search of Lost Time; Lolita; The Lord of the Rings; Moby Dick; Molloy; The Picture of Dorian Gray; War and Peace; Ulysses
Favorite Authors:
Samuel Beckett; Robert Frost; Robert Graves; Ernest Hemingway; Friedrich Holderlin; James Joyce; Philip Larkin; Vladimir Nabokov; Herman Melville; Friedrich Nietzsche; Flann O'Brien; George Orwell; Marcel Proust; Henry David Thoreau; William Shakespeare; Wallace Stevens; John Steinbeck; Jonathan Swift; J.R.R. Tolkien; Leo Tolstoy; Walt Whitman; Oscar Wilde; William Butler Yeats

1 posted on 05/03/2010 8:52:32 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Second Amendment First
Patrick Walsh is a writer who lives in Princeton. Speaking as someone who recently lived in Lawrenceville a half-mile in from the Princeton Township line, that should tell you all you need to know about Paddy Walsh. Princetonians may not smell like Berkelyites, but they are mostly leftist moonbats nonetheless.
2 posted on 05/03/2010 8:54:38 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

How did he do this? Four years of college then becoming an “officer” - what program is that? OCS? Then leaves the military to go back to college

“A 1989 graduate of St. Bonaventure University with a B.A. in history, I served four years as an infantry officer in the 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii.

I received a Master’s in Anglo-Irish literature from the University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland in 1997. “


3 posted on 05/03/2010 8:57:21 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

The “original draft” was rejected.


4 posted on 05/03/2010 8:57:26 AM PDT by steve8714 (The only private property the Feds value is intellectual property.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

If Patty Boy here wants to be defenseless, then fine, but leave the rest of us alone. It’s clear this fool wouldn’t defend his own family.


5 posted on 05/03/2010 8:57:38 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
With a bolt-action rifle and a telescopic sight, I could put a bullet through my neighbor from a hundred yards away as he crosses his living room.

Not much skill there.

6 posted on 05/03/2010 8:57:44 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Second Amendment protections were put in place so that citizens could shoot operatives of an oppressive government, not deer.

"Never Forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn't allow him to do if you were equipped to prevent it."

- Alexander Hope

8 posted on 05/03/2010 8:58:32 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

“To put it another way, Virginia Tech doesn’t happen if Seung-Hui Cho is brandishing a sword.”

It also don’t happen if someone pulls out their Glock and caps your sorry ass.


9 posted on 05/03/2010 8:58:33 AM PDT by jessduntno (I am not a racist. You're just saying that because I'm white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

So he’s pontificating based on the fact that he has fired guns before...

I suppose that makes him an expert among leftists...


10 posted on 05/03/2010 8:58:41 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down an erroneous interpretation of the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller

I agree! SCOTUS was FAR too wishy-washy in Heller.

The old gun lobby claim "guns don't kill people" is specious. No one rails against the manufacture of axes or baseball bats; there are no campaigns to ban Bowie knives.

MORON! That's the point the "gun lobby" is trying to make!

With a bolt-action rifle and a telescopic sight, I could put a bullet through my neighbor from a hundred yards away as he crosses his living room.

You need more range time.

11 posted on 05/03/2010 8:59:22 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
Well, all this does is prove that military service is no guarantee against being a sheeple. One doesn't have to be a "constitutional law scholar" to see that this sap is just another brainwashed sheep, ready to allow the acts of criminals determine the rights allowed the law-abiding.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

12 posted on 05/03/2010 8:59:44 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Take it from a former soldier: A gun's power is arbitrary and wildly disproportionate to its price, size, and ease of use.

Take it from a current Soldier: you're a pussy. STFU and good riddance to any of your type who ETS. We're always better off without you. Now take GEN Casey with you.

14 posted on 05/03/2010 9:00:23 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Aren't we glad the libs control the univesities and we require officer candidaes to have college degrees? This way we can enusre an officer corps of f'n idiots.

When I think of this guy, I think of the idiot Lt that went chasing the scout in the movie "We Were Soldiers."

15 posted on 05/03/2010 9:00:29 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Clearly, the framers placed the right to bear arms within the context of organized military service.

Clearly the framers intended for the Bill of Rights to pertain the individual citizens of the United States - their inalienable rights - and not some collective to operate on behalf of the United States.

I suppose the author would also say that the First Amendment is only for the free speech of authors who write for news organizations.

16 posted on 05/03/2010 9:01:13 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Everyone needs valid ID except illegal aliens and the President - only in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

My reading of the 2nd Ammendment is that the armed citizenry must exist BEFORE you can have a militia. That is the way the Ammendment is worded. It’s ironic that some of the most educated people can’t tell the difference between restrictive & non-restrictive clauses.


18 posted on 05/03/2010 9:01:31 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

So he’s a smart liberal elitist who actually was in the military.

He can room with George McGovern and others.


19 posted on 05/03/2010 9:01:36 AM PDT by wardaddy (never been particularly pious but I stand with Franklin Graham...bigtime...you betcha...ya'll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

20 posted on 05/03/2010 9:01:51 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

“Clearly, the framers placed the right to bear arms within the context of organized military service. They wished to highlight the distinction between state militias and the federal army. They viewed state militias as a check against the misuse of the army to impose centralized tyranny.”

What a jackass. There was no federal army when the Constitution was written. The 2nd Amendment is about preventing tyranny- because standing armies are a threat to liberty. Only fools allow the government to have a monopoly on lethal force, and our Founders were no fools. The real cancer is that academics like this continue to overshadow real scholars like this gentleman:

“The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes.” —Thomas Jefferson: Diffusion of Knowledge Bill, 1779. FE 2:221, Papers 2:526


22 posted on 05/03/2010 9:02:26 AM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

the author is an idiot and has no understanding of what our nation was founded on or what it means.


24 posted on 05/03/2010 9:03:07 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Thank you for your service in defense of our country ... but you have your head up your ass.

If random passer-bys had wielded their personal firearms, the perpetrators of these heinous crimes would be worm bait and many of those victims would be telling you how foolish you are.

25 posted on 05/03/2010 9:03:58 AM PDT by dartuser ("Palin 2012 ... nothing else will do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
I served four years as an infantry officer in the 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii.

Schofield barracks?...therein lies the problem....if it had been the Bedford Forrest Barracks maybe you mighta learned a thing or too sissy.

/s

27 posted on 05/03/2010 9:04:32 AM PDT by wardaddy (never been particularly pious but I stand with Franklin Graham...bigtime...you betcha...ya'll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson