Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-524 next last
To: betty boop
It seems to me verses in John clearly demonstrate that the Father and the Son are One, "in" one Godhead which also includes the Holy Spirit. There is one divine Substance which expresses as Three Persons.

Thank you for those excellent Scriptures from the Gospel of John, dearest sister in Christ! And thank you for your beautiful insights and testimony!

It seems to me that some mortals want to apply the laws of logic to God, e.g. the Law of Identity or the Law of the Excluded Middle --- as if God, the Creator of such laws, is restricted by His own Creation.

Man is not the measure of God.

501 posted on 04/09/2010 10:16:56 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; wagglebee; xzins; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Eagle Eye
Awesome post, AG!

Shalom.

502 posted on 04/09/2010 10:18:48 AM PDT by Buggman (HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
To God be the glory!

Amen!!!

Thank you so very much for your encouragements, dearest sister in Christ!

503 posted on 04/09/2010 10:19:20 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Buggman
Thank you so very much for your encouragements, dear brother in Christ!
504 posted on 04/09/2010 10:20:41 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Buggman
It seems to me that some mortals want to apply the laws of logic to God, e.g. the Law of Identity or the Law of the Excluded Middle --- as if God, the Creator of such laws, is restricted by His own Creation.

I think it's worth noting that when it really mattered He CHOSE to abide by the exact laws that He set for us.

He DID NOT need to become fully Man through the Incarnation.

He DID NOT have to suffer and die on His Cross.

He DID NOT have to be Resurrected and Ascend into Heaven.

He could have saved mankind WITHOUT any of these things, He CHOSE not to.

He CHOSE to be fully Man and sacrifice Himself out of His love for us.

505 posted on 04/09/2010 10:27:04 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
So very true, dear brother in Christ!

Praise God!!!

506 posted on 04/09/2010 10:29:43 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; wagglebee; Quix; xzins; Buggman; P-Marlowe; metmom; Eagle Eye; kosta50; spunkets
It seems to me that some mortals want to apply the laws of logic to God, e.g. the Law of Identity or the Law of the Excluded Middle — as if God, the Creator of such laws, is restricted by His own Creation.

Indeed and so true, dearest sister in Christ. And it's even worse than that — some use a sort of mindless "cookie-cutter logic," for example: "God cannot be tempted by evil, but Jesus Christ was; therefore, Jesus Christ is not God."

It seems to me to apply logic and the laws of nature to God — i.e., to the Source whereby they came into existence — is to falsify the divine character from the get-go. Ineluctably, such a maneuver "makes man the measure" of God.

There is no way for man to "measure" the I Am That I Am — pure self-sufficient eternal Being. It seems to me we humans cannot even conceptualize such a thing, let alone make it subject to the ordinary rules we understand from our purely human experience.

Thank you ever so much for your most perceptive observation, dearest sister in Christ!

507 posted on 04/09/2010 11:37:33 AM PDT by betty boop (The personal is not the public's business. See: the Ninth Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl; wagglebee; Buggman; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Eagle Eye

May I add the words on Trinity of the blessed Thomas a Kempis to our reflection. See the third paragraph, especially.

IMITATING CHRIST AND DESPISING ALL VANITIES ON EARTH
HE WHO follows Me, walks not in darkness,” says the Lord.[1] By these words of Christ we are advised to imitate His life and habits, if we wish to be truly enlightened and free from all blindness of heart. Let our chief effort, therefore, be to study the life of Jesus Christ.

The teaching of Christ is more excellent than all the advice of the saints, and he who has His spirit will find in it a hidden manna. Now, there are many who hear the Gospel often but care little for it because they have not the spirit of Christ. Yet whoever wishes to understand fully the words of Christ must try to pattern his whole life on that of Christ.

What good does it do to speak learnedly about the Trinity if, lacking humility, you displease the Trinity? Indeed it is not learning that makes a man holy and just, but a virtuous life makes him pleasing to God. I would rather feel contrition than know how to define it. For what would it profit us to know the whole Bible by heart and the principles of all the philosophers if we live without grace and the love of God? Vanity of vanities and all is vanity, except to love God and serve Him alone.

This is the greatest wisdom — to seek the kingdom of heaven through contempt of the world. It is vanity, therefore, to seek and trust in riches that perish. It is vanity also to court honor and to be puffed up with pride. It is vanity to follow the lusts of the body and to desire things for which severe punishment later must come. It is vanity to wish for long life and to care little about a well-spent life. It is vanity to be concerned with the present only and not to make provision for things to come. It is vanity to love what passes quickly and not to look ahead where eternal joy abides.

Often recall the proverb: “The eye is not satisfied with seeing nor the ear filled with hearing.”[2] Try, moreover, to turn your heart from the love of things visible and bring yourself to things invisible. For they who follow their own evil passions stain their consciences and lose the grace of God.


508 posted on 04/09/2010 11:42:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Salvation; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; wagglebee; Buggman; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe
Thanks for posting this. A few years ago Salvation did a thread series of The Imitation of Christ, there would some great threads and it might be worth doing again.
509 posted on 04/09/2010 11:47:10 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Alamo-Girl; wagglebee; Quix; Buggman; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Eagle Eye; metmom
This is the greatest wisdom — to seek the kingdom of heaven through contempt of the world. It is vanity, therefore, to seek and trust in riches that perish. It is vanity also to court honor and to be puffed up with pride. It is vanity to follow the lusts of the body and to desire things for which severe punishment later must come. It is vanity to wish for long life and to care little about a well-spent life. It is vanity to be concerned with the present only and not to make provision for things to come. It is vanity to love what passes quickly and not to look ahead where eternal joy abides.

Thank you ever so much, dear brother in Christ, for these illuminating passages from Thomas a Kempis. In the final analysis, Christianity is not so much about what we know, but is manifestly about how we live; not about what we think, but about what we do.

And that basically boils down to: Do we follow Christ, or not?

Thank you ever so much for writing!

510 posted on 04/09/2010 11:51:30 AM PDT by betty boop (The personal is not the public's business. See: the Ninth Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Alamo-Girl; xzins; P-Marlowe; betty boop
One of the most intriguing things about God is that He bases His right to rule us not on His power but on the fact that He keeps His promises. That is why "King of Kings and Lord of Lords" is written on Yeshua's thigh: In Abraham's day, one put one's hand under the thigh when swearing an oath.

God did not NEED to sacrifice His Son; He did so to reveal His love. He did not NEED to fulfill prophecy; He did so to prove His trustworthiness. He did not NEED to Incarnate and live perfectly under His own rules; He did so to demonstrate His righteousness. Therefore, we who know the Messiah Yeshua are no fools to love Him, trust in Him, and submit to His judgment.

Shalom.

511 posted on 04/09/2010 12:02:44 PM PDT by Buggman (HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Buggman; wagglebee; Alamo-Girl; xzins; P-Marlowe
One of the most intriguing things about God is that He bases His right to rule us not on His power but on the fact that He keeps His promises.

Amazingly, beautifully said, Buggman — this, and what follows! Thank you oh so very much!

512 posted on 04/09/2010 12:41:03 PM PDT by betty boop (The personal is not the public's business. See: the Ninth Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

I am going to ignore your whole post and ask you again, if you do not accept that life begins at conception what, in God’s name, is your rationale for opposing abortion.

Please be specific.


513 posted on 04/09/2010 1:49:54 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: JouleZ
You “condemn”, yet, I will pray for you to have compassion, as I did, when taking care of these women who choose “murdering their own child for being inconvenient”, as you put it.

Abortions are sad and traumatic, but there are far worse things than abortion. Blaming 10YO girls for not wanting to carry a rapists baby, Daddy’s baby/ your own half-sister or half-brother is one of them. I find that offensive and call parents who do that “murdering their own child for being inconvenient” and being a victim of rape. I’m sure you have heard the statistics on that. If not, there’s always Google.

I condemn the mothers who kill their own offspring through abortion. I didn't say I didn't have any compassion for them. I didn't say I wanted them charged as murders. I just can't see any legal justification for their actions. That being said the most severe punishment for their crimes will come when they meet their Maker.

And your tired examples of 7 year old girls impregnated by their uncles won't gain trackion with anyone on this website. I am on record as saying the law should stipulate in such cases, but it's actually irrelevant. Rape and incest represent statistically insignificant numbers of abortions. People who approve of abortion like bringing them up because they get a lot of play, but virtually all women who get abortion are healthy and just don't want the hassle of pregnancy.

514 posted on 04/09/2010 1:58:21 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The Bible is clear that the life of the flesh is in the blood.

There is no blood flowing at conception.

What basis do you use for presuming life at conception? The Bible?

How do you intend to convince people who do not have your same religious beliefs? Are you in favor of passing laws to rule other people based on your religious beliefs?

If so, where does that stop?

How does that differ from others wanting laws based on their religious views?


515 posted on 04/09/2010 2:35:15 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Do I need a reason to oppose abortion in order to make you happy?

But if I go around using the Bible for a reason for doing something it might be nice if the Bible actually said what I claimed it did.


516 posted on 04/09/2010 2:41:33 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“Rape and incest represent statistically insignificant numbers of abortions. People who approve of abortion like bringing them up because they get a lot of play, but virtually all women who get abortion are healthy and just don’t want the hassle of pregnancy.”
__________________________________________________________

I agree, the exception is rare but that is my one time I am saying an exception is warranted. FYI, I was the only non-Catholic who refused to do abortions but I will say, there are exceptions. IMHO Thanks for your response.


517 posted on 04/09/2010 7:27:34 PM PDT by JouleZ (You are the company you keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl
[ Are we to be satisfied with such simplistic, superficial answers to questions of such enormous importance? ]

Exactly.. Whose to say.. Who can even know?..
Whether God has ONE or 128 Spirits is a mute point, I think..
What is..... Is.. and What ain't........ Ain't..

How can a temporal entity(man) de-construct GOD...
To study classify and bag GOD.. for christs sake..
Who are these devine scientists that know God like they are his shrink?..

Must be some that invented a small God.. and display him/it like an idol..
-OR- some that want to be believe God is an interesting myth.. (for the rubes)..
i.e. like Joseph Campbell..

I find solace in a God that can raise my horizons...
And studies ME and not me him...

518 posted on 04/09/2010 7:44:59 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
It seems to me to apply logic and the laws of nature to God — i.e., to the Source whereby they came into existence — is to falsify the divine character from the get-go. Ineluctably, such a maneuver "makes man the measure" of God.

There is no way for man to "measure" the I Am That I Am — pure self-sufficient eternal Being. It seems to me we humans cannot even conceptualize such a thing, let alone make it subject to the ordinary rules we understand from our purely human experience.

Precisely so! Thank you so very much for your beautiful essay-post, dearest sister in Christ!

519 posted on 04/09/2010 8:48:36 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Indeed it is not learning that makes a man holy and just, but a virtuous life makes him pleasing to God. I would rather feel contrition than know how to define it.

Indeed.

Thank you so very much for that beautiful essay, dear brother in Christ!


520 posted on 04/09/2010 8:52:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson