Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now, is it time to take the birth certificateissue seriously?

Posted on 03/22/2010 5:05:06 AM PDT by paythefiddler

this would be a direct way to kill the bill


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: afterbirthers; birfer; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; chat; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obamaisabirther; orly; orlytaitz; taitz; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: Brytani

amen...


41 posted on 03/22/2010 7:26:20 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
You're wasting your time with him/her.

Willful ignorance can't be changed, that's why it called stupid.

You know it's willful ignorance because he/she completely ignores the father and only makes reference to the mother.

Also, as you pointed out, he/she completely redefines NBC to fit their beliefs.

42 posted on 03/22/2010 7:50:29 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

From the Constitution:

“If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law”

The pocket veto only works if Congress adjourns. As long as Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law when the President signs it or in 10 days if he doesn’t sign it.


43 posted on 03/22/2010 8:05:47 AM PDT by truthfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: paythefiddler

We need to see Barry’s original long form birth certificate, proof that he registered for Selective Service and his college records from Occidental.


44 posted on 03/22/2010 8:08:34 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
The subject makes you look like an idiot and undermines your crediblity in effectively fighting the real issues in front of us.

Constitutional eligibiliy IS a "real issue". If you will not demand that one part of the Constitution be obeyed, you have no credibility in demanding that other parts be obeyed.

45 posted on 03/22/2010 8:30:20 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
It DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU’RE RIGHT!
YOU WILL NEVER HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVE IT!

Now that is the saddest comment you could make.

46 posted on 03/22/2010 8:36:14 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
According to citizenship law in effect at the time of his birth, she was not old enough to automatically confer citizenship to her son at birth.

But it only applies to an outside the country birth. It's not so much she wasn't old enough, but rather she had not lived in the US long enough after her 14th birthday. Same thing almost, but someone could be 25 and still not meet the residency requirement if they had lived overseas most of the time after turning 14.

The requirement also only applies if the US citizen parent is married to an alien. It's much less if both parents are citizens or the mother is not married.

47 posted on 03/22/2010 8:40:56 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
Republicans were compliant because McCain too was ineligible

Or they may have thought he might be. In reality, two US parents and born in the armies of the nation, makes him an NBC accordig to Vattel's "Law of Nations", which is the likely source of the two parents/born the country definition of NBC that the founders used. See "Law of Nations", Book I, sections 212 and 217.

48 posted on 03/22/2010 8:44:18 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

The primary question in my mind, at this point, is “Why couldn’t the Clintons dig anything up?”.


49 posted on 03/22/2010 8:48:55 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
If Obama’s Mommy had a one night stand with Osama Bin Laden and lil Barry was born, should we let him be President cause he was a citizen? Would the Constitution allow for it?

Probably, but not if OBL took her as his 4th wife in some Muslim country.

But of course we really don't know if he was born in Hawaii for certain. We just know that some "birth record" says he was. But those things are easy to file fraudulently, and it was done frequently in the past. Just file as a non-hospital birth, and back then, there were no questions asked.

50 posted on 03/22/2010 8:51:38 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
“Why couldn’t the Clintons dig anything up?”.

Cause Dead Fish dug up something juicy on them?

51 posted on 03/22/2010 8:53:10 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Mutually-Assured Destruction.

Not just for nations anymore.


52 posted on 03/22/2010 8:54:18 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: msg-84
Accept for the fact that Barrack’s mother was a US Citizen and no matter where she was on the planet when her water broke, her child was born a US Citizen.

Even if that were true, if not born in the US, he'd be a naturalized citizen for Constitutional purposes. This is because he would be a citizen under statutes enacted by Congress. Such have been ruled to be "naturalized" by the Supreme Court, since Congress only has power to make people citizens via naturalization. It's in the Constiutition, article I, section 8.

53 posted on 03/22/2010 9:12:48 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

You’re right. I’ve wasted enough time on the idiot. Thanks.


54 posted on 03/22/2010 9:18:38 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

In the morning light, it appears we are a day late and a dollar short.
Nothing but O’s removal can fix things...
Those who opposed the health care bill are despondent,
Those who wanted it, might want to get ready for the bill they are going to have to personally pay..or the Gestapo...ah...IRS will take it...
Life changes today is a very personal way for his supporters, and detractors alike.


55 posted on 03/22/2010 10:01:58 AM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
“Supposedly the first person arrested on any bill Obama signs can demand his BC as part of their defense. I think this is another reason why this does not kick in until later.”

This is utter and complete nonsense. Where do you folks get this kind of stuff?

If you are arrested because of a bill, you would have the right to challenge the constitutionality of that bill. If the court says it's constitutional, that's it. You didn't suffer harm and get standing for your unrelated project—you simply broke the law.

56 posted on 03/22/2010 10:02:14 AM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

A constitutional attorney. You are a miserable old defeatist.


57 posted on 03/22/2010 10:09:55 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Sepllnig is nto sa ipmroatnt sa godo garmamr.


58 posted on 03/22/2010 10:30:47 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
The way to kill it is on Constitutional Grounds. Congress has no authority to control health care. The Commerce Clause doesn't give them such power since Health Insurance cannot be bought across state lines. This Bill imposes a Bill of Attainder(1) on every person, and every newborn person, born in the USA. and that is 1000% unconstitutional by itself.

That is the same Constitution that says that the POTUS must be a "natural born citizen", isn't it???

59 posted on 03/22/2010 11:01:00 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
"... if not born in the US, he'd be a naturalized citizen for Constitutional purposes. This is because he would be a citizen under statutes enacted by Congress. Such have been ruled to be "naturalized" by the Supreme Court, since Congress only has power to make people citizens via naturalization. It's in the Constiutition, article I, section 8."

Bullshit. My wife gave birth to my son while stationed with me in Europe.

www.uscis.gov/naturalization

Just like John McCain, who was born in Panama, my son did not have to go through the naturalization process - he is a citizen by birth.

BTW:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

That's Article II Section 1, dumbass.
60 posted on 03/22/2010 12:17:46 PM PDT by msg-84 (Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson