Posted on 02/15/2010 7:43:23 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
JUST BREAKING....RED STATE DEMOCRAT RETIRES.
all you need to do is google
http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title3/ar8/
“By disclosing his retirement one day before the filing deadline, the idea was that no Democrat would qualify for the primary ballot and the party’s state central committee could tap their favored candidate. “
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32990.html
Dems see handwriting on wall.
TV nets will be about 6 weeks behind them.
Hilarious....yeah, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE run, John Cougar Idiotcamp. I’m beggin’.
I knew you'd have some inside info and reliable opinions.
For the first time I like Bayh. Shafting Obama is sweet! :)
There's a oustanding tag line by one of our fellow FReepers: "I love liberty more than I hate war".
Deep down, I do believe that it's coming unless God Himself steps in (although I can see his hand in several situations already)and levels everything and I hate it....but I will not hesitate, not one second. Thank you for replying.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100215/pl_afp/uspoliticsbayh
Obama hit hard as Bayh bows out
by Jim Mannion Jim Mannion
1 hr 11 mins ago
WASHINGTON (AFP) – US President Barack Obama suffered another setback Monday as a fifth Democratic senator, centrist heavyweight Evan Bayh, decided not to run for re-election in dismay at the bitter political climate.
Obama, who reportedly tried to talk Bayh out of retiring, faces a looming Republican resurgence and risks watching strong majorities in Congress crumble in November mid-term elections, and with them his ambitious reform agenda.
With his tearful wife and two sons at his side, Bayh, 54, expressed disenchantment with excessive partisanship in the Congress as he announced his decision at a press conference in the state capital Indianapolis.
“For some time, I have had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should. There is too much partisanship and not enough progress — too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem-solving,” he said.
“Even at a time of enormous challenge, the peoples? business is not being done.”
Democrats expressed shock at the development, seeing it both as the loss of a key consensus builder in the Senate and of a candidate strongly favored to win re-election in Republican-leaning Indiana.
A top White House official said Bayh, who called Obama on Monday morning, was “by nature a governor not a senator.”
The New York Times reported that both Obama and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel tried to convince Bayh to run again, but to no avail.
In a statement, Obama praised Bayh for “reaching across the aisle on issues ranging from job creation and economic growth to fiscal responsibility and national security.
“I look forward to continuing to work with him on these critical challenges throughout the rest of the year,” he said.
Republican Dan Coats, a former senator who later served as US ambassador to Germany, recently announced he would challenge Bayh, who has never lost an election in Indiana and once considered running for the presidency.
The son of Indiana senator Birch Bayh, he was best known as a moderate who co-sponsored a 2002 Senate resolution authorizing the Iraq war.
“He is a centrist, and it seems that the center is not holding,” said Diane Ravitch of the Brookings Institution in a posting on Politico.com. “If senators such as Bayh leave or lose, the rancor in Washington will get louder and meaner.”
His decision not to run for a third term was the latest sign of trouble coming at Obama and his Democrats as they head into mid-term elections amid rising public anger over high unemployment and economic uncertainty.
Explaining his disenchantment, Bayh pointed to last week’s collapse of legislation aimed at creating jobs and a Senate vote against a bipartisan commission to deal with the exploding deficit and debt, which he called “one of the greatest threats facing our nation.”
“After all these years, my passion for service to my fellow citizens is undiminished, but my desire to do so in Congress has waned,” Bayh said.
“My decision was not motivated by political concern,” he said. “Even in the current challenging environment, I am confident in my prospects for re-election.”
Polls indicate that Bayh could easily have won re-election, making his decision all the more frustrating for Democrats struggling to hang on to the large majorities they won in 2008.
A poll last week showed Bayh, who is reported to have 13 million dollars in his campaign chest, with a 20-point lead over Coats.
“My decision should not reflect adversely upon the president,” Bayh said, calling Obama’s agenda “the right agenda for America.”
But it follows the loss of the Senate seat in Massachusetts held for decades by the late Senator Edward Kennedy, which stripped Democrats of the 60-seat majority they need to override Republican delaying tactics in the 100-seat chamber.
Bayh is the fifth Democratic senator to opt not to run for re-election in 2010, a list that includes other party heavyweights Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota.
It was unclear who would succeed Bayh as the Democratic candidate from Indiana. Possible contenders include Representatives Baron Hill and Brad Ellsworth. The deadline for filing is Friday.
Coats, 66, faces a challenge for the Republican nomination from former representative John Hostettler.
Democrats had already mounted bruising attacks on Coats, casting him as a carpet-bagger who lives and votes in Virginia, a lobbyist for drug industry interests and a foreign agent for interests as varied as Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Yemen.
Evan Bayh sees that the Obama cabal is bound and determined to take this country where even some Democrats don’t want to go.
______________________________________________________________
You’re right.
_____________________________________________________________
Agree with you both, the most expedient thing for ANY democrat to do who holds future ambitions within the federal government is to get the hell out of there ASAP...either that or gain the name of betrayer of the party by standing up to uhbama and his cabal of marxist thugs.
“My decision should not reflect adversely upon the president,” Bayh said, calling Obama’s agenda “the right agenda for America.”
Yeah, that’s what I call a real “centrist”.
I think this is just the beginning. The money is all gone. The treasury is pilfered. The jig is up. These guys aren’t stupid. They don’t want to be around when the revolution happens.
My pleasure.
What a friggin' liar. Couldn't he just be honest, just once, in his life?
He might challenge Obama.
His speech today was non-partisan; sounded like he had a plan in mind.
Maybe he wants to be governor again, or maybe President, or did he just pull a John Galt?
I love how these Democrats continue to cry about Partisanship and Republican obstruction (water carried by the compliant MSM as usual), when the FACTS are that, for the past year, the Democrats had sufficient majorities in the House and Senate to do whatever they wanted, and the Republicans were unable to stop them. The fact that the Democrats couldn't get anything done had absolutely nothing to do with the Republicans, but rather the fact that they had frightened the hell out of most Americans with their lurch to the radical extreme Left. As Rev Wright liked to say — the turkeys are coming home to roost.
Anyone have an idea why Bayh is really leaving. Could it be he realizes—finally—that Onada is exactly the commie he said he was? And Bayh, down deep, is still an American first?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.