Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warming will 'wipe out billions'(Women and minorities hit hardest)
news.scotsman.com ^ | Nov. 29, 2009 | Jenny Fyall

Posted on 11/30/2009 6:21:24 AM PST by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: PROCON

Is the earth getting hot, or is it just me.

21 posted on 11/30/2009 6:31:59 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It appears as though they are going to continue as if nothing happened...

The UK ‘climate change’ (formerly known as Global Warming) crowd HAS BEEN SHOW TO BE LIARS


22 posted on 11/30/2009 6:32:35 AM PST by Mr. K (Deathly afraid my typos become a freeper catchphrase...I'm series!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Global Warming Blamed on Hot Women
Written by BerlyGirl
A new study has shown that the ozone layer isn’t to blame for global warming trends, and scientists are looking in a new direction - at hot women.

“The human race as a whole is a lot more attractive than it used to be,” states Dr. Kelvin Archburr, a climatologist at the Hollywood Center for Weather Patterns. “With new advances in technology, women especially are able to use clothing, makeup, and surgical techniques to change their appearance and become more visually pleasing. This causes a physiological reaction in men that raises their temperature, and more of that heat is radiated into the air, thus raising the ambient temperature.”

Historical data shows that average global temperatures remained stable until the 1960s. During every decade since then, average highs have risen several degrees. Women’s studies show that it was around that time that women became more liberated in their grooming habits due to sociological struggles and the availability of synthetic materials. Women who were previously thought of as homely gained the ability to dramatically change their appearance and transform themselves into irresistible sex symbols. As men experienced their own sort of sexual revolution and it became more acceptable to openly view women as sex symbols, a noticeable shift in weather patterns started to take place.

In already warm parts of the US, the rise in day-time temperature means more outdoor activities in the sun for young women. As the summers have gotten warmer, shorts have gotten shorter and bikini’s have become smaller. This translates into more time in the sun tanning, playing beach volleyball, and skinny dipping, which in turn has led to further gawking and further warming. “It’s a vicious cycle,” says Dr. Archburr. “It also explains why cities such as Miami, San Diego, and Paris, which have high populations of attractive women, are experiencing a faster rate of warming, and areas such as northern Minnesota are still cold as hell.”

Originally thought to be caused by a breakdown in the ozone layer, global warming is responsible for world-wide climate changes that affect weather patterns, animal habitats, and polar melting. Dr. Archburr is confident that this exciting new discovery will give the science of climatology, and good-looking women, a boost in popularity, and that in the future they will see more college students interested in this field. Says Dr. Archburr, “It’s a hot topic.”


23 posted on 11/30/2009 6:33:42 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DB

‘Phd’ does mean Piled higher and deeper.


24 posted on 11/30/2009 6:35:18 AM PST by mathluv ( Conservative first and foremost, republican second - GO SARAHCUDA!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Now who would survive?
The elitist college prof and political hack types, that couldn’t grow or hunt anything for survival.
Or the fam that knows how to farm and hunt?


25 posted on 11/30/2009 6:35:30 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
With the refusal of the spineless idiots in Washington to do anything to prevent a nuclear Iran, the thought of a nuclear winter worries me a lot more than something that may happen in the next hundred years.

Right now I’m more worried about surviving until 2012. The current "team" in Washington is the biggest natural disaster we face.

26 posted on 11/30/2009 6:36:03 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

The former, if the elitists get their way and decide who lives and who dies.

The latter, if we keep these bastards from attaining that power.


27 posted on 11/30/2009 6:38:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Scientists need to get out in front of this. Geology, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry -- you name it -- the experts in those fields ought to come out and say:

"I'm not a climate scientist, but I do understand the importance of data. I understand that data is not thrown away. I understand that data is not manipulated to hide inconvenient truths. And I understand the importance of an untainted Peer Review process. Because I understand how science is supposed to be done, I call for a worldwide effort to clean house within the Climate Science field so that we can get away from science done for money and politcal ideology and return once again to science being done to advance human knowledge and the discovery of truth."

28 posted on 11/30/2009 6:38:42 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Wait, wait, you mean that these CFLs in my house are doing nothing? The constant carpooling? All this is for naught?

Next you’ll be telling us that they’re hiding the decline, that the sun’s been inactive, and that all this is just a world wide redistribution of wealth to go from the first world to make them peasants and to make the third world dependent on a never ending cycle of aide.

Surely this can’t be... Now where did I put that sarcasm tag?


29 posted on 11/30/2009 6:39:31 AM PST by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

There were how many abortions last year??


30 posted on 11/30/2009 6:39:33 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; All

I’m quite old and produce a lot of methane on my own. Should I expect the FEC (Federal Euthanasia Team) to visit me any time soon?


31 posted on 11/30/2009 6:40:42 AM PST by davisfh ( Islam is a very serious mental and social illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/earth-day-predictions-of-1970-the-reason-you-should-not-believe-earth-day-predictions-of-2009 They were sating the same things about global cooling in 1970.


32 posted on 11/30/2009 6:40:45 AM PST by quincysbuddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Yawn - bored with liberal lies and scare tactics.


33 posted on 11/30/2009 6:40:51 AM PST by GOPJ (Anthropogenic global warming-the most costly and widespread scientific FRAUD in history-James Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Nothing man will do will effect climate trends. Now, women and minorities just might make a difference...LOL!


34 posted on 11/30/2009 6:41:01 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

How much do these guys get paid to make this stuff up?


35 posted on 11/30/2009 6:44:10 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Is there any way to focus “climate change” so it will wipe out politically-compromised “scientists” and liberals? Now THAT would be worth all the money. Maybe flooding copenhagen to a depth of 100 feet this month would be a start?


36 posted on 11/30/2009 6:44:14 AM PST by hal ogen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

37 posted on 11/30/2009 6:44:22 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Socialism is hip until somebody loses a paycheck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
LOL!

It is precisely the underclass that will be “wiped out” financially with this phony “global warming”. Why should they even care? These folks push abortion at any time for any reason. Again, the underclass is hit the hardest with this legalized murder and women suffer the emotional consequences. Women are emotionally damaged.

38 posted on 11/30/2009 6:44:30 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
MOST of the world's population will be wiped out ... nly around 10 per cent of the planet's population – around half a billion people – will survive ...

Oh Nooooooo!!! We're DOOMED!!!

Mommy, mommy hep me, hep me!
Where's my Blanky and Rubber Ducky?!?

39 posted on 11/30/2009 6:45:15 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

We are...THO D00MED!!!


40 posted on 11/30/2009 6:45:50 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Don't eat your dog; eat obnoxious, liberal humans to save the planet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson