Beam me to Planet Gore !
Where does this leave Quisling Newt?
Call your DC and demand an investigation NOW.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18192-hacked-archive-provides-fodder-for-climate-sceptics.html
We The People must demand an investigation NOW.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18192-hacked-archive-provides-fodder-for-climate-sceptics.html
Meanwhile, Zero ignores facts:
US President Barack Obama said Tuesday the world has moved “one step closer” to a “strong operational agreement” on climate change at next month’s Copenhagen summit after his talks with Indian and Chinese leaders.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393596/posts
Oh Algore - you have some ‘splainin to do ......
I DO I DO!
why don’t these Malthusians eugenicists just off themselves if they so believe this COMMUNIST lie
Hey, Mikey! How about proving that "warming" is anthropogenic and catastrophic?
"In fact, you have been free to do so for decades and haven't been able to."
Anyone who believed in human caused global warming is a fool.
Human activity will not cause climate change on a global level long term level.
Short term local changes maybe.
These GW liars were suggesting that people who disagree with them be jailed or even executed. Now they try to pretend they were just engaged in some sort of debate. I know evil when I see it. Treat them exactly they way that wanted to treat others, I say.
>> Many scientists contacted by Nature doubt that the leak will have a lasting impact...
They’ve been taking “unnamed sources” lessons from the NYT.
“Many say...” isn’t appropriate for what passes itself off as a scientific journal.
By the way — that’s a nice set of paragraphs you have there, Mr. Badger. ;-)
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Energy and Environment Subcommittee – Hearing
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology: Finding the Path to Commercialization
Witnesses:
Mr. Roger Bedard, Ocean Energy Leader, Electric Power Research Institute
Mr. Craig Collar, Senior Manager, Energy Resource Development, Snohomish County Public Utility District
Mr. Jacques Beaudry-Losique, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Renewable Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
Mr. James Dehlsen, President, Ecomerit Technologies, LLC
Ms. Gia Schneider, Chief Executive Officer, Natel Energy, Inc.
10:00a.m. – 12:00p.m.
2318 Rayburn House Office Building (WEBCAST)
Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee and Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee – Joint Hearing
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Independent Audit of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Witnesses:
Hon. Thomas Howard, Acting Inspector General, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Mr. Daniel Murrin, Partner, Assurance and Advisory Business Services, Ernst & Young LLP
Hon. Elizabeth Robinson, Chief Financial Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
2:00p.m. – 4:00p.m.
2318 Rayburn House Office Building (WEBCAST)
Nature is playing CYA here.
It’s still uncertain whether the emails are genuine. Well, at this point, I’d say the statistical odds against any fake emails being added by the whistleblowers is about a thousand to one. Many of the emails have been confirmed, and NONE has been proved a fake—even though the global warmers would absolutely JUMP at the chance to do so. Not one.
And to say that the word “trick” stands out is kind of like saying that one of Stalin’s murders was worse than the others. No, sorry, there are HUNDREDS of incriminating emails in this bunch. They reveal falsification of evidence, cover up of evidence, conspiracy to commit fraud, ganging up to bully anyone who disagrees with them, abuse of the peer review process, and many other frauds and, yes, crimes.
Nature was not totally on board, I don’t believe. But they were very helpful to the global warmist conspirators and leaned heavily in their direction. So they try to downplay the evidence of this criminal conspiracy.
Come on, Nature. Your reputation is at stake. It’s time for you to side with science, apologize for any involvement on your part, conscious or unconscious, and repudiate fraud.
That is a very “tame” peice for Nature. I wonder who got the despicable assignment of having to print it and what they did to deserve this?
Half the article is the defense while the direct manipulation of the peer review process and the scientific journals themselves don’t get a mention.
Interesting.
Perhaps this is the first of what will ultimately be a flood of small but important stiletto wounds that Jones can expect to suffer in the coming months. They will have to cut this guy loose to try to save themselves.
Oh, they have - in non-peer reviewed journals. That's because the AGW proponents - according to this very email dump - controlled whose work was peer-reviewed.
Look at the LAST line of the article where Nature says this..............’However, von Storch believes that, at least until the affair is resolved, Jones should cease reviewing climate science for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.’
Now look at what von Storch actually SAID ON HIS BLOG.........’Another conclusion could be that scientists like Mike Mann, Phil Jones and others should no longer participate in the peer-review process or in assessment activities like IPCC.’
Once again a supposed credible media source COVERS for the fraudsters, in this case by misrepresenting what von Storch writes in his own blog about what should happen to the likes of Mann and Jones.
I guaranty if I bring this up over the holidays nobody will know what I'm talking about and then tell me to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh.
That isn't the refute, a$$bagger. The refute is that 1) is not caused by CO2 and humans and 2) It has been warmer as recently as the Medieval Warming Period and the cycles are normal.
BTW - Analysis showing the earth warming has been replicated. Unfortunately, it showed that your hockeystick missed the Medieval warming period and some cooling again during the industrial age. When you said they were wrong, they asked for your data so they could prove it with your own data. But, alas, first it was lost, then it was confidential, then it was proprietary.