Skip to comments.
Spin from the BBC about Darwin (devoted to absolving Darwinism from revolutionary evolutionism)
CMI ^
| October 22, 2009
| Russell Grigg
Posted on 10/22/2009 8:31:09 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
The British Broadcasting Corporation in England has deemed it necessary to try and absolve Darwinism from any responsibility for the Holocaust and the many other atrocities committed in the name of evolutionary progress ever since Darwin published his Origin of Species in 1859. To achieve this, BBC2 produced a TV documentary entitled Darwins Dangerous Idea,[1] written and presented by their journalist and political commentator Andrew Marr. This 3-part series...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Germany; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Georgia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; antiscienceevos; biology; catholic; christian; communism; corruption; creation; darwindrones; darwiniacs; dna; euthanasia; evangelical; evofanatics; evolution; evoreligionexposed; holocaust; intelligentdesign; liberalfascism; moralabsolutes; nazi; nazism; prolife; protestant; religion; science; socialism; stupidbeyondbelief; stupidityonsteroids; suicide; templeofdarwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 441-449 next last
To: Gumlegs
Why are there no feral chickens? Because in Texas we call them Guinea Hens.
To: GodGunsGuts
My response has been a bit more brief ,but The Hand works too.
182
posted on
10/22/2009 1:57:27 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Forrest, you continue to make me chuckle!
183
posted on
10/22/2009 2:07:25 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Natural Law
"At the time Abraham was commanded to sacrifice his son and Joshua was commanded to commit war crimes it was not yet scripture. They proved that they were no better than those who sacrificed children to Baal." At the time 2 Tim 3:16-17 was written, Genesis and Joshua were considered Scripture. For you to claim that commands given before they were considered Scripture are not actually Scripture invalidates the entire Bible, including the words of Christ.
"Maybe you and I have different Gods. My God would not command you or me to commit an unconscionable act in His name."
Interesting that you assume that your definition of 'unconscionable act' is the same as God's. I believe that was the problem Job's friends had. Or perhaps you are merely your own god?
Just how much Scripture do you have left after you get finished throwing out the parts you don't like? And if you are so certain as to retain that right for yourself, why do you not give the same right to others who choose to include the parts you don't like? Surely you have some Scriptural basis for that behavior. Are you really just your own god?
184
posted on
10/22/2009 2:14:51 PM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GodGunsGuts; Buck W.
I don't debate or answer questions posed by evo-atheists who pretend to be Christian while denouncing genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. You are a wolf in sheep's clothing. There is no debating you, there is only exposing you as per Matthew 7:15-20. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter. What a contemptible coward you are.
185
posted on
10/22/2009 2:20:52 PM PDT
by
Gumlegs
To: mnehring
Ted Holden? I thought that was like a big internet/usnet joke from the late 90s like John Titor. He was a parody like claiming that Saturn was once in earths orbit (or the other way around) and a bunch of weird stuff to try to fill in the Young Earth evidence gaps? He was/is real?
LOL, that's fantastic. I think Ted's work is done. From an anonymous nut, to an Internet nut with a "voice," to a Free Republic bannee several times over nut, to a FR retread nut, and now the coup de grace - a mythical legend in his own time nut!
If you doubt the "realness" of Wendy1946, you merely have check out his recent posts.
When one is a true nut, one can't help outing himself.
186
posted on
10/22/2009 2:21:42 PM PDT
by
whattajoke
(Let's keep Conservatism real.)
To: Gumlegs
He said while peering into the mirror. It must suck being you.
To: Buck W.
To Chuckles, the self made man: Go speak to The Hand.
I have no time for your nonsense.
188
posted on
10/22/2009 2:25:47 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: GodGunsGuts
No, it was addressed to you.
Feel free to fling a few Bible verses around and avoid answering again, but you really should try coming up with a new act. This one's getting stale.
189
posted on
10/22/2009 2:27:00 PM PDT
by
Gumlegs
To: Gumlegs
Eh, GGG’s had a rough day. Admonished by the mods, the usual cronies too busy today to back him up much... Remember, he specifically asked to have his religious posts remain in “news” and he has said many times he feels that his spamming is the Lord’s spamming.
190
posted on
10/22/2009 2:29:54 PM PDT
by
whattajoke
(Let's keep Conservatism real.)
To: ElectricStrawberry
“Whacky like...Man living in the land of 100+ large meat eating dinosaurs?”
Prior to the Fall, why would God have put T-Rex and other ripping/tearing dinosaurs at such a disadvantage in the vegetarian world? Did cows have to chew their lettuce for them?
On the other hand, why would he have given them such a post-Fall advantage?
191
posted on
10/22/2009 2:32:35 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Natufian
In answer to both questions, nope. I was just giving an illustration,food for thought: If Darwin can’t be blamed for Hitler,then can Marx be blamed for Stalin?
192
posted on
10/22/2009 2:32:44 PM PDT
by
liberalism is suicide
(Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
To: count-your-change
Nice talkin’ to ya! Have a great day, Forrest!
193
posted on
10/22/2009 2:35:47 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: mnehring
Them be ‘”Goofy Chickens” and I has a dozen.
194
posted on
10/22/2009 2:42:44 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: xcamel
They are about the funniest animals I’ve seen, and dumb as dirt.
To: GodGunsGuts
Argumentum ad Hominem :
The fallacy of attacking the character or circumstances of an individual who is advancing a statement or an argument instead of trying to disprove the truth of the statement or the soundness of the argument. Often the argument is characterized simply as a personal attack.
1. The personal attack is also often termed an "ad personem argument": the statement or argument at issue is dropped from consideration or is ignored, and the locutor's character or circumstances are used to influence opinion.
2. The fallacy draws its appeal from the technique of "getting personal." The assumption is that what the locutor is saying is entirely or partially dictated by his character or special circumstances and so should be disregarded.
196
posted on
10/22/2009 2:47:00 PM PDT
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, ThereÂ’s a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: mnehring
True, but they are death on two legs to all the bad bugs that dare to enter my barn and pastures.
(and they are a cheap [pun intended] alarm system for the barn too!)
197
posted on
10/22/2009 2:48:41 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Ira_Louvin
Correction:
Slanderum ad Nauseum
198
posted on
10/22/2009 2:49:49 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: RightWingNilla
Sometimes I’m a developer/programmer as it depends on the contract details.
199
posted on
10/22/2009 2:50:05 PM PDT
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: Buck W.
200
posted on
10/22/2009 2:51:38 PM PDT
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 441-449 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson