Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/14/2009 1:04:02 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Maceman

Mr Kansius was an amazing indivual, May God rest his soul.


2 posted on 10/14/2009 1:07:16 PM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

I was going to hope someone invented the spine for Republican politicians.


3 posted on 10/14/2009 1:07:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Hmmm, very interesting. I wonder what the efficiency is.


4 posted on 10/14/2009 1:09:15 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
The most amazing invention according to my neighbor is the Thermos Bottle!
5 posted on 10/14/2009 1:09:47 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Absolutely..........remarkable.


6 posted on 10/14/2009 1:11:07 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
The inventor passed away last year, a true modern day Edison. But we have to rely on way cool, chin pubbed college kids for all the inventions right? If it doesn’t come out of Cal Tech, MIT or some other moldy university and is found to be of some political as well as practical use it never sees the light of day. It gets in some journal and is spoken about by sweater vest wearing intellectuals at the fall mixer. Find a way to clone polar bears it's on the vening news and gets gobs of funding, anything to fuel the engine of commerce and capitalism...well that is not important. It's never about clean energy its about control. Now windfarms and solar are not good enough for the Nazis, its simply us living in TeePees.
9 posted on 10/14/2009 1:14:54 PM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

It’s easy to separate water into hydrogen and O2.
It’s doing it with less energy than you get out of it that so far can’t be done.
The laws of physics say it is not possible.


10 posted on 10/14/2009 1:15:16 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
That is not new and it takes as much to power it as it produces. Zero sum game.
11 posted on 10/14/2009 1:16:39 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

The radio waves require an electrical current, which requires a generator, which requires a fossil fuel (or nuke).

Can’t get something for nothing. The energy released by the burning hydrogen must be less than the energy stored in the burned fossil fuel that runs the electric plant that runs the radio generator.

Sorry, that’s the physics of it.


15 posted on 10/14/2009 1:18:01 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is fading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Cool, now we can boil off the oceans!


17 posted on 10/14/2009 1:19:31 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Oh, if you do want to achieve a power break through, figure how to produce and control balled lightning.


20 posted on 10/14/2009 1:21:38 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Some additional info here:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/09/070913-burning-water.html

I can’t find much in the way of specifics. Not that I expect it to violate the laws of thermodynamics, but it would be a neat way to generate hydrogen for energy storage - maybe use nukes to generate hydrogen to power pollution-less cars.

One question I have...

If the process breaks up the water into H and O and then “burns” them back into water...what happens to the salt in the saltwater?


23 posted on 10/14/2009 1:23:59 PM PDT by chrisser (Tweet not, lest ye a twit be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
Electrolysis of water with an electric current does the same thing. Only problem is you use more electric energy than the energy stored in the resulting hydrogen gas.

My bet is that RF is far less efficient at breaking the hydrogen-oxygen bond, and the net energy deficit is even worse.

30 posted on 10/14/2009 1:29:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
Just so you all know, I know of this, it was a great hoax and this guy admitted to it. This is not a real thing, so don't pass it on to friends in Email and end up looking stupid OK.

He was having fun at everyone else’s expense.
Is great for a laugh.

42 posted on 10/14/2009 1:45:48 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

BUMP for later read


61 posted on 10/14/2009 5:06:39 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson