Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
No. I can only tell you rules as apply to Australia. It's a 'numbers' system. From memory, your ID has to add up to something like 120. You get so many points for a passport, so many points for a Medibank Card, etc. You couldn't open an Aussie Bank Account with a US SS number. I don't think our Banks would recognize it.
PS Try the Bahamas!
It could of have been being done for petty crime of some sort even. How can we know without a further investigation. He has been associated with many radicals so far that we do know about (and the list continues to grow) so there may be even a more serious type of corruption or crime involved.
There is alot of strange stuff about Obama and he is fighting to keep ALL of his past records sealed. Not just his birth certificate.
Uh, what Afghan dude?
“so let me get this clear, you want to know why, right?”
Please sir...may I have more?
Here is the post whereas American Expat in Indonesia, Larry Martin, who claims first hand knowledge that Obama has struck a deal through his political lackey Faleomavaega (fellow democrat) to hide or destroy all of Barry Soetoro’s Indonesian records in exchange for Obama ad the democrats turning a blind eye to any atrocities and genocide committed against the people of West Papau.
http://laotze.blogspot.com/2008/09/obama-throwing-papau-under-bus.html
No, that did not come out because t didn’t happen. He was going by Barry Obama. Hope this helps.
thanks, I remember that. Do you recall his Freeper name?
Sorry but I disagree. I do remember reading of the fact that he made the decision to change his name during his time at college and that he was known as Barry when he first came to the states from Indonesia.
The bearded guy with his left hand on Judge Carter.
No. Sorry but I just remembered this post of his that was interesting. I am suprised that we have heard of no follow up investigation at all on what he claims.
I’m trying to understand how having several SS#’s aids soemone trying to remain undert the radar but gaming different systems? Could Stanley Ann have been opening accounts under her son’s name using different SS#’s, then she accessed these funds at different times? I don’t get it yet.
Name one case where the judge granted a motion to dismiss without the plaintiff having a chance to respond first.
**********************
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/15/hamblin-v-obamamccain-dismissed-with-prejudice/
http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-suit-dismissed-as-moot-scotus.html
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=5936
http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=896
In other words, most of the dismissals that you’ve been cheering like a chinslurp.
So I’m not the only one to have that running around in my head. And thanks MHGinTN for expanding on it. There are so many mysteries and inconsistancies that something has to be rotten.
Obama’s attorney’s are just trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat. Their argument regarding quo warranto is so weak as to be laughable.
So’s Jim Webb!
If you don't qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen, you can't possibly be a Natural Born Citizen.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
The phrase, "subject to its jurisdiction" was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.
SLAUGHTERHOUSE CASES, 83 U. S. 36 (1872)
Those cases weren’t dismissed based on a motion to dismiss. They were dismissed before the defendants even entered an appearance (or were served).
Here, defendants entered an appearance and were served, and filed motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs must have a chance to respond. And, today’s Court order gives plaintiffs until Sept. 28 to respond.
Well there is an article just out today which was posted by another FR poster earlier in this thread:
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues
http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=3255
In the article it claims:
.What is interesting to note is that Obamas grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.
It also states that his mother used multiple addresses and S.S.#s as well.
So it is possible that it does have something to do with his upbringing and family.
It seems that trying to hide their identities was a common practise possibly for his mother and family. More has to be researched about them as well as about Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.