Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
I have a professional photoshopper where I work. I can question him tomorrow and report.
It seems like a lot of trouble to change the folds. But, nerds ARE known to do strange things. They get tingles, ya know?
Apparently, it was pulled off of a genealogy website.
I think she is confused....what is her accent...doesn't sound like a native born to my ears.
No it isn’t..
PowerPro has a quote mark at the end of the link that messes it up.
Just click and and remove the quote at the end and hit enter.
No it’s still there...I just accidentally had a “ at the end of it.
Now try:
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg
True.
But I’m not so sure someone would think that ‘deeply’ over at DU!
:)
Same thing occurred to me.
On the other hand, if the Australian BC was used as a template for a fake Kenyan document, who might have done it? Who might have had access to the Australian one?
Go to the genealogy site. Does the name Bomford ring any bells?
Where did the G.F. Lavender come from...I thought it was K.F. Lavender or E. F. Lavender.
Probably my fault. In quoting Technical Editor's link above, I inadvertently included the trailing period, rendering it invalid.
G.F. Lavender and Miller are on the Australian birth certificate.
But the printed, not typed, numbers are identical.
LOL..just posted to you about the same thing.
O’Reily doesn’t think it is important to know anything about the POTUS! He is such an arrogant jerk. Did you hear him say if he wanted to see the real BC he could do it in an instant or some such nonsense?
Is he that stupid or is it his producers and researchers?
*gasp* Shame on you! ;-)
With the same form number? Same price? Same last name for the Registrar and District Registrar? Same book? Same page?
I’m still thinking Swordmaker’s post from the huge thread got the REAL Kenyan BC:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=52#52
The rest is just a maze of deception from the Obama camp designed to have us run around in circles. Just my opinion...
And.........
The book and page numbers are identical, too. 44B and 5733, or whatever it was. Impossible!!!!!!!!1
I think this one is fake. It looks like someone tried to fix the type where the folds are.
I asked this question a few minutes ago and \had a connection problem, so it may appear twice and if so, I apologize.
Where are these forms generated? In the original country or province?
Or are they drawn up from a master registry in England?
If the latter, then they would be on the same form and if withing Lavendar’s career span, be signed by him.
If they are drawn up in the country of birth, then they must be fake because Lavender is not going to be in both countries.
So where do these docs originate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
