Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
The folds are in absolutely different places.
that bomford link has gone...
I think that is a rust stain or one of foxing, which happens on old paper.
Page number info (at the bottom) is the same.
ZOT!!
Ok .. I see .. and that was after the
thread had been up for over about 15+ hrs.
Who knows what evil they do ........
Of course, that could also be produced by changing the date on your computer before you save the file.
Ballgame........rats.
I hope she knows what she is doing.
Not so fast.
Australia didn't gain legal independence from Great Britain until 1986 with the passage of the Australia Act.
Both Kenya and Australia were possessions of Great Britain. It's NOT inconceivable that both would use the same form or at least similar forms to make it easier for Great Britain to register and process its citizens. It's also not inconceivable that the same bureaucrats would appear on documents that are less than two years apart. We're assuming that Lavender was in Kenya..but what if he were a British bureaucrat?
Tell me why Australia and Kenya wouldn’t have similar documents since both were protectorates of England?
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! The mystery is solved!
Congratulations, Technical Editor!
I do hope Queen Orly of Birfertania enjoys her plane ride across the pond.
Holy Cow!! It’s gone. We got copies though and I’m going to throw up a new post.
Bill O’Reilly just questioned why in the world Obama would release his birth certificate when those requesting it seem unhinged!
Why. He can’t see the obvious difference.
Take it to ‘em Jim!!!!
Thanks for making it happen!
The URL is:
https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/03118509265
But you have to have an account to get there.
That is my question...In fact this document looks fake (similar background to some other fakes)
I know that’s right .. SO someone changed
it ON THE SCRIBD SITE ... ???
Assuming the Bomford paper is the "template"...how in the world could the Kenyan one wind up with what look like aged or worn fold marks clearly in different positions on the paper, and a different number of folds? Wouldn't the copy carry over those folds as well? Or, are those folds readily "removed?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.