Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
This cert has a format and language very similar to the language of docs from Australia, (possibly a common british format) particularly New South Wales. Anyone have anyway to view docs from Aust during this time?
Chrisitan name is a big hint.
I saved the image to my computer at 9:58:39 a.m. CDT on 8/02/09. It clearly says E. F. Lavender and 47044.
nice attempt at misdirection, but that boat doesn’t float.
What about vans from “Flowers By Irene?” :D
What I have been asking myself for the last 48 hours is: There is no way Dr. Keyes and Dr. Orly are going to ruin their reputations with something false. Therefore, I trust what they are doing.
With all due respect sir, the E is darker and plainly obvious.....
I also have one saved and it is clearly K. F. Lavender (or Lavonder).
I remember logging on that morning and realizing you guys had been up all night. This is all very strange and until we hear something from WND or Dr. Orly, I am not sure what to make of it other than someone is trying to hide something or confuse everyone yet again.
Not really. Common term (not used so much in this country now due to PC BS) in English speaking nations where the practice of giving a first and middle name in addition to the father's or tribal name was adopted.
Mine was saved at 403 am Pacific time and has the EF on it... It happened VERY soon after the news broke. 2 hours maybe.
Looks like the “original” may be a fake, too.
See
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg.
Someone posted this elsewhere:
I wanted to see if I could find any images of similar documents from Kenya around the same time period that could be compared to the certificate on the web. I spent several hours with Google image search on that before I decided to broaden my search outside of Kenya-specific documents.
It was some time later that I finally spotted a thumbnail on one of the results pages that looked very much like the Kenyan certificate. I pulled up the full size image and found that it was virtually EXACTLY the same type of document.
It was a scanned image of a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth” dated in 1964 for a David Jeffrey Bomford on a genealogy website for the Bomford family. Except that David Jeffrey Bomford wasn’t born in Kenya, he was born in South Australia. But what was even more interesting was certain other features of the document as compared to the Kenya certificate.
The names of the registrar and the district registrar were the SAME NAMES as given in the Kenya certificate save for the first initials, i.e. G.H. Lavender and J.H. Miller in the Bomford document versus E.H. Lavender and M.H. Miller in the Kenya document.
Also, the book number (44B) and page number (5733) were the exactly the same on both documents.
The image of the Bomford certificate seems to prove beyond any doubt that not only is the Kenya certificate a fake, but that whomever faked it used the Bomford certificate as the template.
Your mistake was to zoom the ‘real’ one to the point of illegibility. Try again, ace. Use windows picture and fax viewer. Hit the + zoom icon five or six times. It is as clear as the nose on your face.
Someone should post a warning over at Scribd that viewers are being had.
Gee what an stunning coincidence. The seal and a coin both have a similar coat of arms pattern. And I thought they just picked random patterns. /sarcasm
Correct. Take a look at the original link posted on the other thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2306351/posts
You can clearly see that the link orlytaitzesq.com has a URL of http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/03118509265
Which means the original was without a document title: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/03118509265
Look at the ‘E’ in STATES right above that line in the top copy.
They are definitely different.
Artifacts or not. There is too much difference between the two.
Good grief. I come back after taking a kayak paddle and walking the dogs, and now this.
I wonder if there’s any connection with the google warnings some people have been getting who visit Orly’s site?
In this case the paper copy is the only item that matters. If the judge doesn’t dodge it, then it is open to scrutiny by official experts. I just hope those experts don’t already work for DoJ.
In the inrerview with Savage, she said she was in Tel Aviv and soon departing to Russia for hre parents’ anniversary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
