Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Thanks for the link. If in fact this is the forger, then there is atleast one more to come — and that one purportedly from Hawaii.
A friend of mine posted it on another blog where we were having this same dicussion.
He nor I did NOT create it...I’m just passing on the link
re: http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg
a friend of mine posted it on another blog
Neither he or I did NOT create this image. I’m just passing on the link
re: http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg
· · Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:04:46 PM · 22 of 38
Cardhu to Red Steel; Born to Conserve; PureSolace; Tempest; Zoe Brain
Because you say the pre printed form has been superimposed over the signature does not make it so. This is simply the process of fading over the years, where the ink would fade at a different rate when written over a non-absorbent commercial printer generated typeface. In fact it would be suspicious if the fading had been uniform over those different surfaces.
It is obvious that the ink has faded on the Australian one after 40 odd years and was written with a fountain pen, but the Obama one looks pristine and written with a ballpoint pen, which was considered déclassé in 1964. No Civil Servant of Britain or the ex Colonies at that time would consider signing an official document with a ballpoint pen. They would not even let you take examinations using a ballpoint pen.
Of course the typewritten font was more genuine on the Australian one for that era too.
Just taking a glance at the original it seems to me that it is printed in 8 1/2" by 11" paper, Standard American stock whereas European standard stock is A4, 210 x 297mm a little longer and a little narrower. So I doubt if this is a copy of the actual printed form from Kenya.
The Australian raised seal is off center, readable and initialed which would be normal for a hand stamped document. The other seal on the Obama document is perfectly centered, unreadable and not initialed which would be more likely on a fake.
‘Punkin’ the Birthers: Priceless’ [pictures supposedly from forger of Kenya BC]
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=2307402%2C2244
Washington Independent ^ | 8/6/09 | Dave Weigel
Posted on Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:53:16 PM by lonewacko_dot_com
It’s looking more and more like the forged “Kenyan birth certificate” released by Orly Taitz on Sunday was a prank by a supporter of President Obama. Politijab points to an anonymous blogger at FearlessBlogging, who has uploaded four photos of the original forgery and a mocking declaration:
Fine cotton business paper: $11
Inkjet printer: $35
1940 Royal Model KMM manual typewriter: $10
2 Shilling coin: $1
Pilot Varsity fountain pen: $3
Punkin’ the Birthers: Priceless
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonindependent.com ...
It’s looking more and more like the forged “Kenyan birth certificate” released by Orly Taitz on Sunday was a prank by a supporter of President Obama. Politijab points to an anonymous blogger at FearlessBlogging, who has uploaded four photos of the original forgery and a mocking declaration:
This just shows you what lying little punks they are, Weigel included.
Please tell me what is wrong with those photos? To my untrained eye, they look like pretty convincing proof of the forgery. Please show me how that is not so.
Submitting it to a court filing making it part of official record is not much better.
Maybe I was unclear. The punk who created the forgery is just that, a lying little punk. If he thinks that creating fakes is the way to discredit the people searching for the Obama’s hidden history — going to backfire on them. Proves that Obama supporters are out and out liars.
Taitz made it clear that it was an 'unauthenticated document' to the court. A BIG difference.
Doesn’t matter how cute it was presented. That is not how evidence is filed. But that is how to sneak in info for public record.
“The punk who created the forgery is just that, a lying little punk.”
Agree. Thanks for the clarification.
Take up your complaint with the judge.
Blue's Clues!
We just figured out Blue's Clues
We just figured out Blue's Clues
We just figured out Blue's Clues
Blue99 knew!
No problem. :)
Would you mind giving the web address of the blog you got the link from? And can you tell us how your friend found it?
I’m sorry for asking such skeptical questions, but the way this thing is going, we’ve got to question everything.
Look at this photo!
http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg
Thanks, Cal, for pointing it out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
