Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Sarah, the jpgs are screen shots of PDFs. The jpgs weren’t the created graphic.
I’ve never started one and wouldn’t know in what section to post it in......If you could start it that would be great. Then the many Freepers who have posted all over this thread and the long thread could share their ‘findings’.
this is the site of the official insignia and emblems of south australia.
http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/
the state badge was chosen in 1904, and is a piping shrike with wings spread, surrounded by the words south australia, found here http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/shrike1.htm.
the office of consumer and business affairs has an emblem found here http://www.ocba.sa.gov.au/bdm/index.html, used for the office of births, deaths, and marriages.
none of these look like the seal used on the south australian birth certificate
the state coat of arms for south australia is also found here http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/coatarm1.htm
I posted this on the epic thread but will toss it in here as well.
I found a font online called P22 Typewriter. It appears to have a 1 that matches the ‘out of place’ 1 on the Aussie BC and a lower case l that matches too.
If you visit that link and go to the ‘About this font’ tab, it will give a quick description. The last sentence says, “Additional characters were sourced from other vintage typewriters and others were designed to complete the full character set”.
Not sure which characters though...
Yes, saw that. Thanks.
Thanks Harvey.
Pinging to #1,986 - interesting.
.
I'm not sure what you mean by "side by side of the elements". The Photoshop Elements routine that was used just tries to break the image apart along what look (to a Photoshop software programmer) as lines in the jpeg. I don't think there is anything meaningful to be learned by that. But I could be wrong.
As to Post 1482 I have looked at that part of the Australian BC in Photoshop. There is no doubt that the printed "Deputy" looks like it is a layer above the a signature layer that was not blended properly nor merged properly. This would be pretty good evidence of a fake if it weren't for the fact that the signature is clearly on top of the printed word "registrar". That's very strange. The "Deputy" looks as fake as it can be. And "registrar" looks good as gold. Go figure. I don't know what to make of it.
What poem?
Gotta wonder what would happen if we did the reverse of fake DU BC forms. Without getting too specific, what if a long form that the DUmmies can only dream of was to suddenly appear like it was hiding in plain site for years and years.
The Y crossing over the D is explained away as the inverted dark black being stronger than the inverted lighter Y. Its similar to a grey pen being written on white paper and crossing a black line. When inverted, the grey will appear below the now white line because the black cant get any blacker. Same principle applies.
Looks like it’s close to the different looking “1” on the Bomford B.C. However the ‘flag’ on top of the “1” doesn’t look long enough or curved enough in that example of the P22 Type.....I’ll take another look.
Take the Deputy Registrar part of the Bomford B.C. and enlarge it up to 600 percent. You can clearly see the entire block outline of that particular layer in contrast to the surrounding pixels.
It’s a slam dunk IMO.
The divorce was uncontested, so there likely wasn't any documentation needed.
The divorce notice or whatever it’s called was sent to Obama Sr’s address in Cambridge, MA, but he didn’t respond. But how were Stanley and her lawyer to know beforehand that Obama Sr wouldnt’ respond, what to speak of contest anything? They still would have had to cross the t’s and dot the i’s just in case.
Did anyone see how Orly has said on her website that she believes the Bomford is a fake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.