Posted on 07/30/2009 3:34:15 AM PDT by Man50D
The House health-care reform bill proposes to decrease hospital visits by establishing a medical home pilot program for elderly and disabled Americans.
Such a medical home would not require a physician to be on the staff, and therefore could be run solely by nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Medical homes also would practice evidence-based medicine, which advocates only the use of medical treatments that are supported by effectiveness research.
But physicians groups say the legislation could lead to restrictions on which treatments may be used for certain conditions, despite the fact that some patients might require a unique or unconventional approach. It also may lead to dumping Medicare/Medicaid patients in facilities that are not required to have physicians on staff.
The Center for Medicine in the Public Interest (CMPI) expressed its concerns in a report that explains why statistical evidence does not always reflect reality of effective medicine.
One size fits all rarely does, the report said. From clothes to shoes to hats, few people find that items carrying that label work with their individual bodies. So why do we entrust the health of our bodies -- one of the most important assets we have -- to a one-size-fits-all mentality?
According to CMPI and individual physicians, however, this one-size-fits-all mentality is just what congressional health-care reform suggests.
Unfortunately, policies being advanced under the guise of evidence-based medicine (EBM) could do just that, the CMPI report said. The idea behind EBM, empowering physicians with sound evidence to incorporate into their treatment decisions for individual patients, is a good one.
Unfortunately, EBM now is being distorted by government bureaucrats and HMOs in ways that impose top-down, one-size-fits-all restrictions on patients and their healthcare providers.
Rather than enforcing a formulaic approach to medicine based on statistical and clinical research, CMPI says health-care reform should preserve physicians autonomy to use the research in conjunction with their experience and knowledge of the patient.
It is so critically important for the physician to maintain his or her ability to combine study findings with their expertise and knowledge of the individual in order to make the optimal treatment decisions. Evidence-based medicine in its present, distorted form emphasizes just one aspect of the clinical pie over all the others, the report found.
Kathryn Serkes of the American Association for Physicians and Surgeons echoed the observation.
There is no typical patient, Serkes told CNSNews.com. Every patient is different from a medical perspective. If we have evidence-based medicine that basically says well, we start at treatment one, which leads you to treatment two, to treatment three to treatment four. In practice, that doesnt work for the patient. Thats the art part of the art and science of medicine. Thats what we still need doctors to do, is to figure out whats right for the patient.
In the long run, according to CMPI, evidence-based medicine may not even cut costs as Congress suggests it would.
Evidence-based medicine may provide transitory savings in the short term, but the same patient who takes the cheapest available statin today may very well be the patient costing you -- the taxpayer, the policymaker, the thought-leader, the sister, the spouse -- big bucks when that patient ends up in the hospital because of improperly treated cardiovascular disease, .
The repercussions of choosing short-term thinking over long-term results and cost-based medicine over patient-based are pernicious to both the public purse and the public health, the CMPI report said.
Provisions for the medical home pilot program are an amendment to the Social Security Act, which governs the administration of Medicare and Medicaid services.
The medical home is an approach to medical practice that facilitates partnerships between patients and physicians, according to the proposed bill.
The pilot program targets Medicare beneficiaries who have a high medical risk score or who require regular monitoring, advising or treatment. This currently applies to more than 22 million Americans, according to Kaiser Family Foundation statistics.
At least $1.5 billion would be redirected from the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund to fund the medical homes, in addition to funds otherwise available, according to the bill.
The Senate health-care reform bill also includes provisions for medical homes, although to lesser detail than the House bill.
If this portion of the legislation passes through Congress, medical homes will be part of the greater health-care reform experiment known as "the public (health insurance) option."
According to the committee, the provisions for medical homes will make the public option a stronger competitor against private health insurance companies.
The public health insurance option will be empowered to implement innovative delivery reform initiatives so that it is a nimble purchaser of health care and gets more value for each health care dollar, the House Committee on Energy and Commerces summary says about the bill.
Medical homes are tied to comparative effectivness research via something called evidence-based medicine.
It will expand upon the experiments put forth in Medicare and be provided the flexibility to implement value-based purchasing, accountable care organizations, medical homes, and bundled payments. These features will ensure the public option is a leader in efficient delivery of quality care, spurring competition with private plans, the committees summary also said.
A statement by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) said that the effectiveness of the medical home model should be carefully evaluated before applying the model far and wide.
There should be more research to demonstrate the benefits and continuing costs associated with implementation of the full (patient-centered medical home) model, the ACEP statement said.
Demonstration projects being conducted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services must be carefully evaluated. There should be proven value in healthcare outcomes for patients and reduced costs to the healthcare system before there is widespread implementation of this model.
The proposal, meanwhile, specifically allows for facilities to be run by staff who do not possess medical degrees including nurses and nurse practitioners.
Exactly my first thought.
We have a thoroughly corrupt federal government well past its expiration date.
.
Bud is now owned by a Euro group
Blue Moon may be owned by a Brit firm now
There are many great US brews
I still mostly drink Corona now - sometimes Guiness, Beck’s, Heineken
-
LOL! “Small country”
-
“America is not a Christian nation”
“America is oe of the largest Muslim countries in the world”
— Obama
no ,put you’ll be allowed to hum it
Somewhere, somebody has kept track of all his gaffs and mistakes. It should make quite a list by now.
Corona is Mexican isn’t it. That’s all everyone buys down there so I assumed that.
From experience, I would say it’s the latter. Of course, some people are simply too lazy or apathetic (or stupid) to even vote much less study the issues; mostly though, it’s the need for the average person to work hard, pay the bills, look after the family with very little time left over for politics (even though many issues may be almost life threatening).
.
It was originally (I have heard) a lunch beer for field workers in Mexico
Dos Equis is good too
I like Harp - but it is not sold close by
-
The media and lefties give Obama a pass on everything
But “potato” is a huge problemo
[But potato is a huge problemo]
Umm, you lost me on that, lol.
BTTT! Thanks, JeffHead!
.
Dan Qualye knew Austrian was not a lanquage -
You are jumping around like a mexican jumping bean, lol. I thought of Quale when you mentioned “potato” but didn’t connect it with the beer party stuff.
“...who would become a cousin to fool the Gestapho.”
Ideally we take care of the Gestapo before it gets to the point of them taking care of us their way.
NOW is the time to stop the Leftists in their tracks.
Thanks for the ping!
btt
This is all confirmed ??
I’m shaking ..
Involuntary euthanasia is common in the Netherlands and Sweden (my grandfather was a victim.) It is the future of America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.