Posted on 07/18/2009 7:39:00 AM PDT by Gordon Greene
Trailer: ‘Creation’ — ‘You’ve Killed God, Sir’
Watching the trailer it looks as if they are trying to give a human face to Darwin that seems a bit hard to imagine. The characters are glorified to the point of sticky-sweet perfection which, of course is Hollywood.
Judging strictly from the trailer, the message seems to be that Darwin's "science" was perfect knowledge and religion is finally unmasked as the true heresy... more of the same but with a pretty bow on top.
The foregone conclusion follows mainstream education in America: that Evolution is science fact and not science theory. All that remains is the nail in God's coffin to make it official.
'Course, you Evo's can start your hollerin' that this is only the trailer and if we misled Christians would just watch it we would understand Chucky D the way you do... We don't already know what the Hollywood spin is??? Strange we would make assumptions about Hollywood based on everything we've seen for the past few decades, but I rekon I will. Umm-Hmmm.
(Excerpt) Read more at bighollywood.breitbart.com ...
See what I’m saying?
The two of you, who appear to have a respectable knowledge of phylogeny, can’t even agree on the concept of species.
It then is difficult for ‘me’ to accept your concepts on evolution, if you can’t be sure of the phyla you are predicating your case on.
I apologize. Seems you already provided your definition.
And it is a good one.
If you were the chihuahua, you would understand why.
: )
As a philosophical version of Winchester Castle.
Now is your chance to show those red herring in the two posts I have made to you on this thread. I'll even make it easy for you, posts 241 and 247.
Except for the 'fact' that they both 'evolved' from a tree.
You’re hired! You get to sharpen the trees.
No argument from me.
God did before time began. Besides that, Moses evidently put it on "paper" a "few" years later.
No, it is obvious that DNA is not exactly the same from cell to cell. Mutations do occur and that is one reason why some cells become cancerous. I asked Dr James Shapiro many years ago how mutations would get into the germ line for a sexual creature.(the implication being that Darwinism cannot be driven solely by accidental mutations to the cells of the sexual organs) I never did get back with him on the answer, but it still seems relevant to me. It seems logical that all cells in a sexual animal are prone to mutation.
Football team or King Arthur's Court?
Do you know what Winchester Castle is?
Yes, individually. But it is group behavior that produces 'evolution'.
Apparently I have no clue. Is it a chess move?
I’ll get started. I got a Swiss Army knife and it has a file.
Oh...can I be Czar of Trees???? I understand the pay is pretty good.
She had a psychic or such tell her to build, build, build and she did without purpose or concern for cost. I think you can visit it in California.
So that's your view of EVOLUTION?
No! Any good stuff I keep for myself. It’s that selfish gene the Darwinists keep talking about so don’t blame me.
Moses lived for a very, very long time.
Which brings up the question, if some men lived hundreds of years, why/how did we lose that in our genetic programming?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.