Gravity highs (red) and lows (blue) on the Moon (Lunar nearside right, farside left)SciencePosted on 02/16/2009 8:29:34 AM PST by neverdem
Gravity highs (red) and lows (blue) on the Moon (Lunar nearside right, farside left)ScienceResults from the Japanese space agency's SELENE mission to the Moon are revealing details about why the lopsided lump of rock orbiting Earth is so unbalanced.
The SELENE (Selenological and Engineering Explorer, or Kaguya) mission was launched in September 2007 to gather detailed geological information about the Moon. The results are published in Science1,2,3,4.
Because the Moon has no atmosphere or weather to speak of, its geology has remained almost unchanged since it formed. So unpicking its structure could offer information about how the early Solar System — including Earth — developed. But the Moon has some unusual traits that have so far proved tricky to study: its gravity and the thickness of its crust vary from the near side that faces Earth to the far side.
The Moon spins on its axis once per Earth orbit, so the same side always faces Earth. To get information from the far side of the Moon relayed to Earth is difficult, because the Moon itself blocks the line of sight back to Earth. To get round this problem, SELENE has one satellite close to the Moon to collect data, and a companion sub-satellite in a much higher orbit to relay that information back to Earth.
A team led by Noriyuki Namiki from Kyushu University in Fukuoka, Japan, measured the Moon's variable gravity, in particular around impact craters on the far side. As the gravity changes, the main satellite is drawn closer or pushed farther away from the Moon. This in turn affects the frequency of the signal sent from the satellite to the sub-satellite.
Impact crater basins on the near side of the Moon, says Namiki, can display characteristic plateau-shaped areas of unusually high gravity ('positive anomalies') and denser rock, called mascons. "On the far side, we don't find mascon-like signatures. Instead, there are concentric rings of positive–negative–positive gravity anomalies over the basins," he says.
As the basins on the far side are not dense mascons, their regions of high gravity demand another explanation. Namiki thinks such areas have denser material just under their crust — suggesting that the mantle underneath has been lifted up and compressed. "We assume the crust-boundary is shallower [than was previously thought]," Namiki says.
This kind of mantle uplift would be seen now only if the far side of the early Moon contained a rigid outer layer (crust and mantle) to support the basin, the authors say. And this layer would only stay rigid if the far side was cooler than the near side, where basins are more deformed.
"That's very exciting," says Maria Zuber, a geophysicist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, adding that the question of why the far side is cooler needs more study.
Mapping the gravity field on the far side of the Moon for the first time is the "most transformative piece of information" that the SELENE mission has provided, Zuber adds. "What they have managed to find is that there are differences between the near and far side. It underscores and quantifies the asymmetry of the Moon."
In another SELENE study, Takayuki Ono and his colleagues from Tohoku University in Sendai probed the Moon's subsurface layers using radar. "As there is no water at the surface of the Moon, radio waves can penetrate into the upper part of the Moon crust, probably up to a few kilometres," says Yasushi Yamaguchi, a member of the team.
On the near side of the Moon, the team looked at a characteristic flat, dark basaltic plain, the Mare Serenitatis, or 'sea of serenity'. Several hundred metres below the surface the group spotted a thin layer of loose debris sitting between thick basaltic lava. The debris suggests that the Moon enjoyed a 'quiet period' in terms of volcanic activity, between 3.55 billion and 2.84 billion years ago, the researchers think.
In the 1970s the Apollo missions used a similar radar instrument and found thin layers down to a depth of kilometres in select regions. But SELENE's data did not reveal this deep layer, which Yamaguchi says may be down to the fuzzier resolution of Apollo's radar sounder.
SELENE has also taken pictures of areas with volcanic activity on the far side, and allowed these volcanoes to be dated by the number of impact craters seen there. The data suggest volcanic activity continued until 2.5 billion years ago.
Ben Bussey, a planetary scientist from the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns Hopkins University in Laurel, Maryland, says that the topography mapping from SELENE, especially at the poles, will "be very useful in planning future lunar missions".
Zuber is principal investigator of NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory mission set to launch in 2011, which will map the Moon's gravity in greater detail. "We'll be able to go after fundamental questions, such as does the Moon have a solid core surrounded by liquid," she says. "This is a golden age of lunar exploration."
Tycho Magnetic Anomaly (TMA)-1 ???
Reminds me of a 70’s rock album cover.
??????? Why not just store the data and stransmit when non-obstructed? And two satellites orbiting the same object would still have that object obstructing their communication, unless they were BOTH in extremely high orbits.
Naw.
Just the ET creator’s anti-grav engine components driving the thing . . .
slight /sar
Since only one side of the Moon has been facing Earth for its entire 4 billion or so year history, of course the crust on that side will be different gravitationally from the far side. Earth’s gravity has been tugging on it all that time.
Keeping it simple was just too complicated.
First thing I though of too. Got this big ol’ ball of gravity tugging on it from one side and nothing on the other side.
So does a gravitational hot spot represent a good place for a moon base (assuming more gravity is more earthlike and therefore somehow better/healthier), or does it represent a geologic risk of some kind:?
ping
So does a gravitational hot spot represent a good place for a moon base (assuming more gravity is more earthlike and therefore somehow better/healthier), or does it represent a geologic risk of some kind:?
They are measuring extremely small variations in gravity. A person would not be able to tell the difference. The Earth also has variances in its gravitational field.
More misinformation from the evilutionist conspiracy. /s
Impossible -- the universe is only 6,000 years old. I know this because I've read it in 57,683 posts on FR over the last week.
You beat me by 91 seconds.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Landscapes from the ancient and eroded lunar far side
European Space Agency | July 14, 2006 | Staff
Posted on 07/14/2006 8:23:23 AM PDT by DaveLoneRanger
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1665706/posts
Source of Moon’s Magnetism Found
Yahoo.com | 01-15-2009 | SPACE.com Staff
Posted on 01/15/2009 8:15:48 PM PST by Gordon Greene
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2165544/posts
Planets Around Planets?
Sky and Telescope | 06/05/06 | Robert Naeye
Posted on 06/05/2006 7:32:33 PM PDT by KevinDavis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1644037/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
