Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg
Obamacrimes.com ^ | January 26, 2009 | Philip Berg

Posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:23 PM PST by Calpernia

Advisory from Philip J. Berg, Esquire:

Re: Obama - "not" natural born - "not" qualified to be President

Attached is Press Release detailing:

U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg, case still alive in 3rd Circuit; GLOBE Magazine of 2/2/09 highlights Obama not being "qualified;" and Berg states he has 3 open cases and will continue to prove Obama ineligible.

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________ Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225 Response to Hollister Complaint due 1/26/09 by Soetoro/Obama and Biden

Call (610) 662-3005 to schedule interviews or Fax to (610) 834-7659 or E-mail to philjberg@gmail.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: berg; bho2009; bhoscotus; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; ineligible; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-294 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:24 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; pissant; LucyT; Iowan; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; bvw; ...

Ping


2 posted on 01/26/2009 6:12:31 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
" Case filed under seal, cannot be discussed."

Must be a national security threat to have this seal placed on the case.( sarc. off)

3 posted on 01/26/2009 6:14:00 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Didn’t 0 visit these folks last week?

Gee, I wonder what he said!


4 posted on 01/26/2009 6:14:03 PM PST by siamesecats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks, Calpernia

Ping.


5 posted on 01/26/2009 6:15:37 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: siamesecats; Beckwith; LucyT; Fred Nerks
Gee, I wonder what he said!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

" I already have Acorn Offices in each of your neighborhoods, and believe me, I know where you live!"

6 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:08 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

The sealed case. I’m kinda curious if Berg does have a document in there that has proved Pres_ent is not qualified for his position.


7 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:49 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Is anyone really surprised here? The more they do to refuse to hear this case, the more we know it should be heard. No tinfoil required.


8 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:53 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siamesecats
Gee, I wonder what he said!

Might have been what he did not say.

9 posted on 01/26/2009 6:17:06 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg

Thanks Calpernia.

Ping.

10 posted on 01/26/2009 6:18:56 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Can Berg go to talk radio, show it to Rush, Sean, Mark, Ann and start getting it out that way? There is an end run around the press and we all know it. Why is it not being done?

let him publish his stuff, I am sure all the desperate papers will take a full page ad from him no matter the content anymore. the internet? There has to be a way to go public with this evidence. He has exhausted his legal options, bring it to the court of public opinion.....


11 posted on 01/26/2009 6:19:50 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Actually, I am.


12 posted on 01/26/2009 6:19:53 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Big Ears must still be pissed at what Justice Roberts made him do last week. Don’t forget the picture of Clarence Thomas dozing off while Zero was doing his coronation speech.


13 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:10 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

His cases (accept the sealed one) are published. The MSM has ignored most of this.


14 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:56 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; FreeManN

Thanks for the update on Berg


15 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:58 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Not until he has given the system time to work...If they don’t the Court of Public Opinion WILL decide.


16 posted on 01/26/2009 6:23:34 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Did Thomas really snooze? I missed that.


17 posted on 01/26/2009 6:24:13 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Does he have actual physical irrefutable proof of his ineligibility? Can that be posted? Ads taken in newspapers showing THE proof? Going on talk radio and showing the proof to the hosts to be verified by them? If so, when? This needs to get out if it is true, and if the courts say no, we need to get it out to the people. Only about 20 percent of this country (the far left libs) would not care about a unconstitutional candidate taking office when the proof is right there.


18 posted on 01/26/2009 6:25:55 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

01/26/09: PRESS RELEASE - New Issue of GLOBE Magazine [Feb. 2nd] Highlights
Philip J. Berg, Esq. Efforts to Expose Obama not being “qualified” to be President.
Also, Berg states U.S. Supreme Court denied Injunction request but Berg has three [3] cases still open and Berg states he will prove Obama “ineligible” to be President

(Contact information and PDF at end)

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/26/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama announced today that the new issue of GLOBE Magazine [2/2/09 issue] highlights his efforts to expose Obama not being “constitutionally qualified” and therefore, Obama should be removed from office.

Berg also stated that the U.S. Supreme Court denied his request for an Injunction from the Conference that was held on January 16, 2009. However, the case that was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court, Berg vs. Obama is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals where Berg just filed a Brief on 1/20/09. Berg said I had bypassed the Third Circuit hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear our case on an expedited basis because of the significance of the case.

The two [2] other cases are in Federal Court and I will advise you shortly about the status of each.

Berg said, “This is the 5th time GLOBE Magazine has highlighted the question of Obama’s lack of ‘constitutional qualifications’ to be President. The new story about Obama is the center spread and two [2] other pages. More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the constitutional ‘qualifications’ and that this is the biggest ‘Hoax’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years.”

Berg concluded, “I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the thousands and thousands that have died defending our Constitution with the legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President.”

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254
Response to Hollister Complaint due 1/26/09 by Soetoro/Obama and Biden

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005

philjberg@obamacrimes.com


19 posted on 01/26/2009 6:27:16 PM PST by luv2ndamend (May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. — Samue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

The courts have had their chance. They seem to be in the cover up business as well if they are sealing things like this and they are not up for discussion.


20 posted on 01/26/2009 6:27:34 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson