no site-specific scientifc data or research whatsoever
and is produced by a member of an obscure, unrecognized, non-scientific
internet group attempting to pass off his agenda as scholarly.
Buyer Beware!"
Posted on 01/26/2009 9:13:21 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
Failed expectations are not necessarily a problem for a theory. [1] But what if fundamental predictions are consistently falsified? As we shall see this is the case with Darwin’s theory of evolution...
(Excerpt) Read more at darwinspredictions.com ...
Excellent, excellent, excellent!!!
bump
The survival of the fittest is behind the liberal mantra of meritocracy, but their social programs do everything to promote socialism and prop up the least resourceful and least productive in society.
The liberals say that they believe in man made better by men, but they promote the most base vices that undermine the best in men.
Apparently science is now forbidden to modify its theories when new data come to light.
read for later
When just about every facet of a given “theory” fails to predict, it’s time to scrap the theory and come up with another one. And no, it is not necessary to keep the falsified theory in place until a new theory can be formulated.
The rabid darwinists are out today; it won't be long before they're frothing and snarling here!!
LOL!
Still can’t find Cornelius’ references to Darwin’s ideas about DNA. I suppose I’ll have to search some more.
However Cornelius did acknowledge that Darwin lived 150 years ago. A striking admission from a creationist.
Evolution predicts that species don’t get poofed into existence in conflict with the laws of nature already observed. We’ll keep watching, but until the prediction is proved false, evolution still stands as the best theory.
The Psychic Friends Network has a better track record than Evolutionists.
The Theory Of Evolution is a joke. Always has been.
Give up a successful scientific theory in place of religious belief which relies on revelation instead of evidence? Is that what you're preaching?
At least he makes a lot of money selling books.
Piltdown Man
Nebraska Man
Lucy
Archaeoraptor
Etc., etc., etc., etc......
Someone needs to something similar with Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Obviously you didn’t read “Darwin’s Predictions.” Darwood’s theory has been so utterly falsified that to call it successful is an insult to the very meaning of success.
Please Coyteman, educate us. What makes the theory “successful”? Good PR? The high number of Kool-Aid drinkers like you? I also like how you automatically assume those who dispute the validity of evolution as relying on “religious belief” and “revelation instead of evidence”. That disputes none of the facts, but hey it was a really good argument anyway! </sarc> Prove evolution is true, if you can, but you still won’t be able to disprove the existence of God. While we’re at it, can you tell us one thing about evolution that has been proved true?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.