Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Natural-born' requirement called 'stupidest provision'
wnd ^

Posted on 12/03/2008 6:53:51 PM PST by dascallie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: anniegetyourgun
Total disregard for our founding and governing documents. Obama and his supporters are lawless.

Yes they are.

Unfortunately so are the liberal judicial activism supporters on free republic (in the name of libertarianism) who are mostly in lock step with the ACLU, especially when it comes to judicial activism concerning social issues.

61 posted on 12/03/2008 8:04:33 PM PST by OriginalIntent (undo all judicial activism and its results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

Wow! Obama is going to be defrocked?

62 posted on 12/03/2008 8:04:45 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Sounds like someone is setting up a movement to ignore the Constitution.

Ignore it? I think they're bound and determined to tear it up.

63 posted on 12/03/2008 8:11:12 PM PST by pray4liberty (Always vote for life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Excuse me - does the fact that it is a provision of the US Constitution matter? If she doesn’t like it, offer up an amendment.


64 posted on 12/03/2008 8:29:59 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Lots of his contemporaries didn't agree. Either way it worked out.

Hamilton's contemporaries could have agreed that they didn't want him to be President, but how could they have agreed that he wasn't eligible to be President, considering that the Constitution explicitly said that he was?
65 posted on 12/03/2008 8:30:53 PM PST by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

This crunchy bitch isn’t even 28. What the hell does she know about Constitutional law?


66 posted on 12/03/2008 8:31:37 PM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Outsiders who came to rule a nation do not make for a favorable precedent. Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin were all born outside the countries they came to rule. I think our Founders were very wise to include this provision.


67 posted on 12/03/2008 8:35:49 PM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I don’t think it took a decade to get the income tax amendment through.


68 posted on 12/03/2008 8:36:41 PM PST by ichabod1 (You won't know obammunism is here until it puts a boot in your (fat) bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

too bad it is still there...


69 posted on 12/03/2008 8:36:59 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Sarah: E.S.A.D.


70 posted on 12/03/2008 8:39:16 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

After we remove all of the stupid people in politics and the media, we can remove the stupid provisions of the constitution.


71 posted on 12/03/2008 8:39:29 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Lots of his contemporaries didn't agree. Either way it worked out.

I cited the constitution and the dates relevant to Hamilton. If you disagree, say so and explain. That some of Hamilton's contemporaries did not want him him to be president is irrelevant as to his eligibility.

72 posted on 12/03/2008 8:40:02 PM PST by jbarntt (Tagline:optional, printed after your name on post): -30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: seastay

That was more or less what happened under Clinton, though his citizenship wasn’t questioned. But we got hit again, and again, and again, and never struck back against anyone. We gave peace a chance, we got 9-11.

If the Indians give peace a chance, they’ll get more Mumbais.


73 posted on 12/03/2008 8:40:40 PM PST by ichabod1 (You won't know obammunism is here until it puts a boot in your (fat) bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

All you have to do is pass a Constitutional Amendment - but until then, DO WHAT IT SAYS!

And by the way, any member of Congress or state legislator who votes FOR such an amendment will catch HELL for it.


74 posted on 12/03/2008 8:43:11 PM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

“It’s a living document!”

You may know that Biden believes that to his core. He was the Chair of the Judciary Committee when it nailed Judge Bork.


75 posted on 12/03/2008 8:55:42 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

It’s not stupid at all. It keeps Arnold Schwarzenegger out of the White House!


76 posted on 12/03/2008 8:59:49 PM PST by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
I don’t think it took a decade to get the income tax amendment through.

That was a different America. There's no way states like Utah, Wyoming, the Dakotas, Georgia, Alabama, Oklahoma ...you get the idea.

We're two nations, now, whether we want to admit it or not.

77 posted on 12/03/2008 9:08:48 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: proud okie

yes, up to the forth generation


78 posted on 12/03/2008 9:22:08 PM PST by Lily4Jesus ( Jesus Saves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Ummmm, idiotic statement deserves brief response.

No, it isn’t. It’s one of the best things in the constitution.

They are worried the Obama birthplace really isn’t here, so now they are trying to build up hatred for the thing that could disqualify him.


79 posted on 12/03/2008 9:43:30 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
they prefer to make it up as they go along

absolutely, because of their view of the human condition as "unconstrained" by limitations, they believe that they are capable of making the right decisions based only on what they currently know, and dismiss any previous decisions by others as inadequate and invalid.

80 posted on 12/04/2008 5:09:47 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson