Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional crisis looming over Obama's birth location
World Net Daily ^ | 11/14/08 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 11/14/2008 7:05:09 PM PST by solfour

The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural-born citizen," a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn't ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alankeyes; alinsky; antichrist; ayers; bc; birth; birthcertificate; border; certifigate; choomgang; citizenship; colb; communism; crime; crisis; democrats; dohrn; dunham; electiom; election; electoralcollege; foreigner; fraud; giveitup; illegalalien; immigration; kenya; keyes; law; letitgoalready; makeitstop; naturalborn; news; notthisshiitagain; obama; obamabinlyin; obamagate; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; odinga; pipedream; president; socialism; unitedstates; war; worldnetdaily; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,801-1,8201,821-1,8401,841-1,860 ... 2,501-2,502 next last
To: jamese777
The news reports that I have read of the Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health and the Hawaii Registrar of Vital Statistics addressing the issue did not state whether the question was asked and answered as to whether there is any difference between the information on the vault copy of Obama’s COLB and the version that has appeared on various web sites.

For the last time, did you read the statement of Hawaii Department of Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino, 10/31/08?

That's it and that's all -- that's as far as the Hawaii DOH can legally go, no matter how many "news reports" try to spin, interpret and add to it -- and no matter how annoyed Dr. Fukino reportedly is that the DOH is beseiged with irate US citizens wanting to know the details on such an inconsequential matter (apparently to her) as the Constitutional eligibility of the President-elect. All of your comments beyond the point of the official statement are simply opinion, not fact.

You keep trying to deflect from your assertion, posted repeatedly on this thread in one form or another, that "Hawaii state health department officials have verified the legitimacy of Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth."

They haven't.
1,821 posted on 11/17/2008 3:15:01 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1687 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

The press can track down an 80 year old Brazillian that had a brief romance with a young John McCain but can’t find anyone that knew Obama. Simarly, the press had no interest in Obama’s 1981 trip to Pakistan. I believe, at that time, non-Muslims and Americans were prohibited from entry. It was thought that he may have used an Indonesian passport to gain entry. You’d think that someone would have slipped up and referenced dual citizenship as one of the reasons that Obama was so worldly and smart!


1,822 posted on 11/17/2008 3:16:39 PM PST by philled ("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1799 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
The electors don’t have to vote for McCain.

For that matter most of them don't have to vote for anyone, even the ones bound by statute, would never be held accountable, or the penalty is so minute as to not matter.

1,823 posted on 11/17/2008 3:17:50 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1789 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I am not one who really cares about the motivation of a disputant with me. If I cannot address ANY question then that is a failing with me. And it I do and it is ignored or stupidly addressed then others can see that as well as I.

Some of the points made have been useful to me if no one else at this point.


1,824 posted on 11/17/2008 3:18:12 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: wbill; All

Okay so SCOTUS won’t rule to have the country descend into anarchy. Will the State of Hawaii refuse to relase the original long form 1961 birth certificate when it is requested for the formation of the Presidential Library? IMO the Department of Health in Hawaii is simply delaying the inevitable with their refusal to release the document! What will the citizens of the United States say at that time if the long form birth certificate reveals that Jr was in actual fact not born in the United States, especially if he is sworn in as the 44th President and has a disastorous administration? How angry do you think citizens will be then? Just think of the Constitutional Crisis which would occur then!


1,825 posted on 11/17/2008 3:19:15 PM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1797 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
You said it perfectly! I have learned it is best to ignore some comments and just not respond to anyone who does not lend anything to the discussion. Never against questions being posed, but when someone makes statement after statement and refuses facts to enter in, it is just like talking to an Obama supporter prior to Nov.4th. Its the old don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!

Looking forward to hearing the opinions rendered by the SC and also the SC of California. Until then, I guess it is a wait and see period we are in. Thanks for all the info you provide. My letters to all the Justices went out in today's mail. :)

1,826 posted on 11/17/2008 3:19:52 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: pa mom
I admit I do not come to the same conclusion as you, but, unlike some, I do not choose to insult or demonize those that disagree.

I recognize that in you, unfortunately your message is designed to kill opinion, sort of kill them with kindness, I guess.

Not trying to be insulting here, just stating my opinion, with a smile.<(•¿•)>

1,827 posted on 11/17/2008 3:21:19 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1795 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

There is a SCOTUS decision that states a U.S. citizen under the age of majority CANNOT lose citizenship by ANYONE ELSE’S actions - such as his mother giving up her citizenship ...

A citizen above the age of majority CAN ONLY lose citizenship via an act of affirmation.

So, the questions come down to ... was Obama a natural born citizen, is the SCOTUS ruling retroactive to Obama’s birth, and DID he EVER renounce citizenship via affirmation?


1,828 posted on 11/17/2008 3:22:27 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
There was another thread that discussed this in great detail and I believe the majority concurred with your view. According to some they believed that as there were several political parties back then it would be reasonable for the electors to award the presidency to the candidate receiving the second largest number of votes. Today the field is narrowed to two major parties-hence McCain would automatically receive the electoral votes if the electors followed the constitution.
1,829 posted on 11/17/2008 3:22:49 PM PST by upcountry miss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1796 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

If it were about money Hollywood would be producing movies showing the heroic efforts to fulfill a heroic endeavor rather than the formulaic anti-war crap it excretes in bomb after bomb.

We would not see a media disemboweling itself by ideological bias if it were about money nor ludicrous operations like MSNBC with ratings so low going into the toilet would be a step up.

It is strictly ideological brainwashing. And is why the media cannot be trusted in the slightest. Unless it is destroyed we are in grave danger.


1,830 posted on 11/17/2008 3:23:21 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1817 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; LucyT; arrogantsob; little jeremiah; itsahoot; Flamenco Lady; Lmo56; luvadavi; ...

This lawsuit is said to have eyewitnesses. Is this true? If so, they may need to place them under protective custody.

I took this to mean the those witnesses mentioned in Keye’s case in California with the Independent party referred to the missionairies from Kenya that witnessed a scene at the airport of an upset Ann Obama unable to return to Hawaii.

Several months ago it was reported that witnesses had come forward and stated they recalled boarding a flight that year from Kenya when a very pregnant young white woman was distraught because she was not allowed to board in her advanced condition.

Those with ties to the International missions fields began circulating inquiries.

Then, shortly therafter PC (USA), reported the deaths of our two of our own this summer in the field in Nairobi. They were long retired from field-work, but were returning for a visit to Kenya. Both were brutally murdered upon their arrival in Kenya.

Some of us had speculated that these two deaths were directly related to this BC issue and that is why they were murdered. Those looking have not followed up on the outcome of the murder investigations because of the idea that those leads were gone for good.

It is possible that their statements were documented prior to their deaths.

Or perhaps their statements joggled the memories of others that were also with the missions returning stateside from Kenya.

Christian missionairies are murdered from time to time in Kenya, I just found it odd due to the location of Nairobi and the timing to USA/Kenya issue.

Does anyone have information regarding the current witnesses.

Are they American, British or Kenyan?


1,831 posted on 11/17/2008 3:24:43 PM PST by Gemsbok (Follow the trail,...,.,.,.,..... I know where it leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Absolutely, go for it! As long as posts stick to facts and not personal attacks, I enjoy seeing what everyone thinks. Why in the world would you think I don’t? I just think it’s silly to tell someone they should lock themself in the cellar because they disagree. (I know it was not you.) Do you really think that’s intelligent discourse?


1,832 posted on 11/17/2008 3:26:03 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1827 | View Replies]

To: pa mom
No one is hiding information about his birth, I made that clear.

1800 posts and counting, and you have made nothing clear, it is your job to bring everything negative about Obama into question. If you are being paid, someone is getting their moneys worth.

1,833 posted on 11/17/2008 3:26:12 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1803 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“Qualifications are verified when the EV are received by Congress in joint session as per the Constitution.”

The qualifications of ELECTORS are certified and members of the House and the Senate can raise objections to them.

You are saying that that the Clerk of the Senate verifies age, citizenship, etc. after the electoral votes are counted.

I have searched United States Code Title III, Chapter I: Presidential Elections And Vacancies - there is NO provision for the Senate Clerk (OR ANYONE, FOR THAT MATTER to do ANY such thing.


1,834 posted on 11/17/2008 3:28:05 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1742 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Is there anyone asserting that O renounced his us citizenship? I haven’t found it, but it certainly could be out there.


1,835 posted on 11/17/2008 3:28:23 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1828 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Please view the context. I was referring to my friends. Neither of them are hiding anything about his birth. I’m not referring to anyone else.


1,836 posted on 11/17/2008 3:29:34 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1833 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

There’s an old legal aphorism:

If the facts are on your side, pound the facts.
If the law is on your side, pound the law.
If neither the facts or law are on your side, pound the table.

“Otherwise ... GO POUND SAND !!!” LOL !!!


1,837 posted on 11/17/2008 3:30:02 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1735 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I'm not trying to hide my disgust for this poster nor be subtle. The usual whine will now spew forth 'that she isn't insulting anyone, and is only looking for the reasonable discussion to discover fatcs.' There are in fact NO FACTS which will alter the goal to fulfill the two listed above. But that's just the way it is on an open forum site.

Thanks, butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, she is well organized.

1,838 posted on 11/17/2008 3:30:30 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: philled

The trip to Pakistan is a real avenue to look at.

There is some doubt whether O ever had Indonesian citizenship. I understand it was noted on his school app. but Indonesian law made it difficult more those not born of an Indonesian mother to claim citizenship. They did not recognize dual citizenship. The law has just recently changed, in 06 I think.


1,839 posted on 11/17/2008 3:31:38 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1822 | View Replies]

To: upcountry miss

Our Founders abhorred the idea of political parties (factions was their name for them) and considered them one of the gravest dangers to the Republic. They also realized from close reading of the classics of Greece and Rome that democracy was not reliable and chose a representative republic.

There is nothing in the Constitution which supports political parties or gives them any preferential standing in the political process.

The Founders’ intentions wrt factions and democracy only lasted through the first Washington administration then Hamilton’s successful financial program drove Madison and Jefferson into setting up the forerunner of the Democrat party, the Democrat-Republican. It was established to thwart Hamilton and its adherents eventually drove him from politics and killed him.


1,840 posted on 11/17/2008 3:33:54 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1829 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,801-1,8201,821-1,8401,841-1,860 ... 2,501-2,502 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson