Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Refuses to Answer Birth Certificate Lawsuit
Newsmax ^ | Friday, October 24, 2008 | Kenneth R. Timmerman

Posted on 10/24/2008 9:26:51 PM PDT by Jim W N

A Pennsylvania lawsuit alleging that Barack Obama is not a “natural-born citizen” of the United States took an unusual twist this week, after a federally mandated deadline requiring Obama’s lawyers to produce a “vault” copy of his birth certificate expired with no response from Obama or his lawyers.

The lawsuit, filed by former Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Philip J. Berg — a self-avowed supporter of Hillary Clinton — alleges that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is thus “ineligible” to run for president of the United States. It demands that Obama’s lawyers produce a copy of his original birth certificate to prove that he is a natural-born U.S. citizen.

Berg's suit and allegations have set off a wave of Internet buzz and rumors, though Obama could easily have put the matter to rest by providing the federal court with the basic documentation proving he is eligible to take the oath of a president. But Obama has apparently decided to deny the court and the public that documentation.

The Constitution provides that any U.S. citizen is eligible to become president if the person is 35 years of age or older and is a natural-born citizen; that is, born in the territorial United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: antichrist; bc; birth; birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; constitution; deceptions; obama; obamagate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last
To: Fred Nerks
"...we will not give in to up on fear, lies, theft, and intimidation.”

That's the liberal way. Hey, it worked in Kenya, didn't it?

121 posted on 10/25/2008 4:32:41 AM PDT by shezza (WWRD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Chairman of the Bard

bttt


122 posted on 10/25/2008 4:37:13 AM PDT by petercooper (I am a bitter clinger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

Comment #124 Removed by Moderator

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack

Re your Post 59:

Wow, that takes the award for Conspiracy Theory of the Day. I mean that as a compliment!


126 posted on 10/25/2008 5:32:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JMack

If Obama wins, Hillary will become his VP in 2012 setting her up for 2016.


127 posted on 10/25/2008 5:35:24 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Photobucket
128 posted on 10/25/2008 5:39:31 AM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JMack
If the court doesn’t rule until after the election, I would suspect this is what was going on.

The court ruled. Berg's suit was dismissed. It's back to the drawing board for you.

129 posted on 10/25/2008 5:41:37 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
“....She said you really can't sue based on something the person might do unless you can show irreparable harm will be done.
...................”

What about the “harm” done to democrap voters who gave money thinking they were supporting a viable candidate?
The Hillary supporter that “lost” to Obama, has been harmed!
It seems that they certainly have “standing”!
Also a “good democrap” is harmed in general by having been sold the idea that “Obama-Con” is a constitutionally viable candidate. Given that, to me Berg has standing.

130 posted on 10/25/2008 5:51:49 AM PDT by Reily ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: All

I now beleive that his mommy met all the residency requirements for Obama to be a natural born citizen. Mr 0 could have been born on Krypton, but he would still be a citizen.

I believe that the 0 is hiding a secret that will ruin his adult facade. He is either an illigitimate child of an unknown father or his name has been changed, or his birth name is Bily Bob Dunham. It is something that he really, really wants hidden and he is not man enough to face it.


131 posted on 10/25/2008 6:05:13 AM PDT by Pelagius of Asturias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: nyc1

“I thought birth certificates were publicly available documents.”

Depends on the state, some are open records. Hawaii is not.

http://www.birthcertificatesusa.com/state/brusa_hawaii.html

Obama would have had to provide primary document evidence of citizenship when he first applied for his passport (and social security number)
http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/first/first_830.html

http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10002.html#how

If he used a birth certificate that means it was assessed as genuine by the SSA and Passport Office, and this story is over.


132 posted on 10/25/2008 6:25:52 AM PDT by Reverend Wright (Zerobama: leave no America-hating B*st*rd behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

The article does show quite a number of lawsuits picking up steam:

“The latest suits have been filed in state and federal courts in Hawaii, Washington, California, Florida, Georgia, New York, and Connecticut to compel Obama to release his birth records. “


133 posted on 10/25/2008 6:27:42 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinutesToLive

“Sick grandma” my FOOT!”

On the news this morning the Sick Grandma was upgraded to Dying Grandma. Oh poor Obama! How can anyone vote against him now unless you’re a heartless, mean-spirited racist pig.


134 posted on 10/25/2008 6:30:34 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate

Newsmax didn’t mention that DNC was part of this suit and they had a list of assertions they didn’t respond to either

So it will be interesting to see how this impacts the DNC as a party.

http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2008/10/21/technical-default—barack-hussein-obama-is-not-qualified-to-hold-office-of-potus.aspx#Comment

DNC - Admitted:

1. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for President.
2. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama.

3. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama.
4.The DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

5. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.
6. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born” United States citizen.

7. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii.
8.The DNC admits they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status.

9. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic Nominee for President.
10.The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted Barrack Hussein Obama.

11. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this lawsuit since August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22, 2008.

12. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States.

13. The DNC admits their Credential Committee’s Report failed to address the issues of Barack Hussein Obama’s ineligibility to serve as President of the United States.
14.The DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as the President of the United States.

15. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee to cast their votes upon.
16. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from.

17. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their vote.
18. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the Presidential or Vice Presidential Candidates.

19. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.
20. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

21. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of the United States.
22. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.

23. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution.
24. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution.

25. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution.
26. The DNC admits the function of the DNC is to secure a Democratic Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen’s interests, fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans.

27. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States.


135 posted on 10/25/2008 6:31:07 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

IMHO, anybody that donated money to him or the DNC has a fraud claim if he isn’t a valid, Constitutional candidate.


136 posted on 10/25/2008 6:33:43 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

When did the court rule? Philip Berg just filed a motion for an expedited resolution.


137 posted on 10/25/2008 6:36:53 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: mo

IMO, I think we ALL have a fraud claim. This affected ALL the candidates, not just the DNC’s.

I have a clip of a non DNC primary candidate on a talk show. The pundits wouldn’t speak to him because they said THEY wanted to talk about Obama.

Ripple effect.


138 posted on 10/25/2008 6:39:20 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Reily

I say all voters. All primary candidates too. The media has been monopolized with Obama.


139 posted on 10/25/2008 6:40:55 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
When did the court rule? Philip Berg just filed a motion for an expedited resolution.

Yesterday. I wonder if that's expedited enough for Berg?

140 posted on 10/25/2008 6:49:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson