Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
When did the court rule? Philip Berg just filed a motion for an expedited resolution.

Yesterday. I wonder if that's expedited enough for Berg?

140 posted on 10/25/2008 6:49:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL; LucyT; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; bvw; null and void; SE Mom; ..

Unbelievable. Did you all see post 140?


141 posted on 10/25/2008 7:14:26 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur; Calpernia; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; Polarik; ...

Thanks Calpernia.

Ping.

Excerpted:

A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.

[snip]

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

[snip]

Link to article found at #140:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2114753/posts?page=140#140


161 posted on 10/25/2008 8:30:06 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson