[Reily]

“....She said you really can't sue based on something the person might do unless you can show irreparable harm will be done.
...................”

What about the “harm” done to democrap voters who gave money thinking they were supporting a viable candidate?
The Hillary supporter that “lost” to Obama, has been harmed!
It seems that they certainly have “standing”!
Also a “good democrap” is harmed in general by having been sold the idea that “Obama-Con” is a constitutionally viable candidate. Given that, to me Berg has standing.

[Calpernia]

I say all voters. All primary candidates too. The media has been monopolized with Obama.

[SirFishalot]

What about the “harm” done to democrap voters who gave money thinking they were supporting a viable candidate? The Hillary supporter that “lost” to Obama, has been harmed! It seems that they certainly have “standing”! Also a “good democrap” is harmed in general by having been sold the idea that “Obama-Con” is a constitutionally viable candidate. Given that, to me Berg has standing. Again, State court would probably be the place to challenge his eligibility to run in their election.