Skip to comments.
BREAKING: SCOTUS Sides With Brunner
Fox News ^
| 10/17/08
| Fox News
Posted on 10/17/2008 8:52:19 AM PDT by careyb
Just breaking now. Waiting on link.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: election; electionpresident; judiciary; scotus; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: careyb
41
posted on
10/17/2008 8:59:18 AM PDT
by
NetSurfer
(BO stinks.)
To: Arkinsaw
The 6th circuit ruling was against Brunner. If they were staying out of it, they wouldn’t have reversed it.
42
posted on
10/17/2008 8:59:31 AM PDT
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(You MUST see this website: http://www.neverfindout.org/)
To: LS; PhiKapMom
Give us the Ohio diagnosis now.
43
posted on
10/17/2008 8:59:38 AM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: ninergold3
"until a vote by one of these people is cast there is nothing illegal.." YEP....they register thousands of dubious people so they can pull them out at the last minute to bring their candidate over the top....happened in Washington State during last Governor race....which the Republican had won, in TWO counts....but on the 3rd...well lookee here....we found some more ballots!
44
posted on
10/17/2008 8:59:38 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
To: careyb
Judge Stevens, a Gerald Ford appointee, came through in the clutch for the socialist left bent on restructuring the USA along the lines of socialist europe, if not worse.
Gerald Ford’s enduring legacy....helping to midwife the end of the Reagan Revolution. In a way, I think wherever he is, he’s happy about that...sticking it to the man (Reagan) and the party he so hated.
45
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:16 AM PDT
by
AdvisorB
(Baraq is the Arabic name of the winged horse that took mohammed to paradise from the DomeoftheRock)
To: Norman Bates
46
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:21 AM PDT
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(You MUST see this website: http://www.neverfindout.org/)
To: surfer
There has to be more to their decision. I can’t believe all 9 would just give a green light to voter fraud.
47
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:29 AM PDT
by
Reagan69
To: NetSurfer
48
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:35 AM PDT
by
muggs
To: careyb
Brunner’s Boy Wonder would have been out 200,000 fake votes if the ‘RATS on the SCOTUS would have sided with the GOP and America.
49
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:42 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Barack HUSSEIN Obama is an effeminate whiner and crybaby. Not presidential material.)
To: careyb
50
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:43 AM PDT
by
careyb
To: careyb
How did this get Fast-Tracked to SCOTUS? Attention Philip J. Berg; are you taking notes?
To: Arkinsaw
I said a few days ago that the Supreme Court would simply not get involved.If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.
They pro-actively made this decision.
52
posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:54 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(Be bold. Be brave. You're an American.)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
But they did reverse it. A 3-judge panel of the 6th circuit overruled the original Reagan appointee saying that Brunner had to comply. Then the full en banc court overturned the panel. Now SCOTUS has set a terrible, terrifying precedent.
53
posted on
10/17/2008 9:01:07 AM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: surfer
Full court just means they were all there, not that it was unanimous. I would bet Kennedy was the deciding vote.
54
posted on
10/17/2008 9:01:09 AM PDT
by
livius
To: muggs
I am too, but will wait for whole report.
55
posted on
10/17/2008 9:01:20 AM PDT
by
MNlurker
To: careyb
So now won’t every state file with the Supreme Court to have all of their applications to count too?
56
posted on
10/17/2008 9:01:45 AM PDT
by
arichtaxpayer
(We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
To: careyb
57
posted on
10/17/2008 9:01:51 AM PDT
by
38special
(I mean come on.)
To: goodnesswins
58
posted on
10/17/2008 9:02:04 AM PDT
by
ninergold3
(By Election Day I'll Be An Anorexic/Alcoholic. . .Stress Sucks!)
To: careyb
Anyone have any ideas when the next civil war begins? This stuff is getting out of hand.
59
posted on
10/17/2008 9:02:15 AM PDT
by
weef
To: Norman Bates
How about we wait for the decision, huh?
Remember, these are SEQUESTERED. I think it's the time constraint that was the issue. Not that Brunner doesn't want to cheat, but the Court has been pretty solid on time constraints on voting issues. Remember Bush v. Gore? It was all about time.
60
posted on
10/17/2008 9:02:20 AM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson